MLB 内野转移的因果效应

Sonia Markes, Linbo Wang, Jessica Gronsbell, Katherine Evans
{"title":"MLB 内野转移的因果效应","authors":"Sonia Markes, Linbo Wang, Jessica Gronsbell, Katherine Evans","doi":"arxiv-2409.03940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The infield shift has been increasingly used as a defensive strategy in\nbaseball in recent years. Along with the upward trend in its usage, the\nnotoriety of the shift has grown, as it is believed to be responsible for the\nrecent decline in offence. In the 2023 season, Major League Baseball (MLB)\nimplemented a rule change prohibiting the infield shift. However, there has\nbeen no systematic analysis of the effectiveness of infield shift to determine\nif it is a cause of the cooling in offence. We used publicly available data on\nMLB from 2015-2022 to evaluate the causal effect of the infield shift on the\nexpected runs scored. We employed three methods for drawing causal conclusions\nfrom observational data -- nearest neighbour matching, inverse probability of\ntreatment weighting, and instrumental variable analysis -- and evaluated the\ncausal effect in subgroups defined by batter-handedness. The results of all\nmethods showed the shift is effective at preventing runs, but primarily for\nleft-handed batters.","PeriodicalId":501172,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal effect of the infield shift in the MLB\",\"authors\":\"Sonia Markes, Linbo Wang, Jessica Gronsbell, Katherine Evans\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.03940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The infield shift has been increasingly used as a defensive strategy in\\nbaseball in recent years. Along with the upward trend in its usage, the\\nnotoriety of the shift has grown, as it is believed to be responsible for the\\nrecent decline in offence. In the 2023 season, Major League Baseball (MLB)\\nimplemented a rule change prohibiting the infield shift. However, there has\\nbeen no systematic analysis of the effectiveness of infield shift to determine\\nif it is a cause of the cooling in offence. We used publicly available data on\\nMLB from 2015-2022 to evaluate the causal effect of the infield shift on the\\nexpected runs scored. We employed three methods for drawing causal conclusions\\nfrom observational data -- nearest neighbour matching, inverse probability of\\ntreatment weighting, and instrumental variable analysis -- and evaluated the\\ncausal effect in subgroups defined by batter-handedness. The results of all\\nmethods showed the shift is effective at preventing runs, but primarily for\\nleft-handed batters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.03940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,内野移位作为一种防守策略在棒球比赛中被越来越多地使用。随着其使用率呈上升趋势,内野转移的名声也越来越大,因为人们认为它是近期进攻下降的罪魁祸首。2023 赛季,美国职业棒球大联盟(MLB)对规则进行了修改,禁止内野转移。然而,目前还没有对内野转移的有效性进行系统分析,以确定它是否是导致进攻下降的原因。我们利用美国职业棒球联盟 2015-2022 年的公开数据,评估了内野转移对预期得分的因果效应。我们采用了三种从观察数据中得出因果结论的方法--近邻匹配法、逆概率处理加权法和工具变量分析法--并评估了根据打者手感定义的亚组的因果效应。所有方法的结果都表明,变速能有效防止跑垒,但主要针对左撇子击球手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal effect of the infield shift in the MLB
The infield shift has been increasingly used as a defensive strategy in baseball in recent years. Along with the upward trend in its usage, the notoriety of the shift has grown, as it is believed to be responsible for the recent decline in offence. In the 2023 season, Major League Baseball (MLB) implemented a rule change prohibiting the infield shift. However, there has been no systematic analysis of the effectiveness of infield shift to determine if it is a cause of the cooling in offence. We used publicly available data on MLB from 2015-2022 to evaluate the causal effect of the infield shift on the expected runs scored. We employed three methods for drawing causal conclusions from observational data -- nearest neighbour matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting, and instrumental variable analysis -- and evaluated the causal effect in subgroups defined by batter-handedness. The results of all methods showed the shift is effective at preventing runs, but primarily for left-handed batters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Bayesian framework to evaluate evidence in cases of alleged cheating with secret codes in sports Unsupervised anomaly detection in spatio-temporal stream network sensor data A Cost-Aware Approach to Adversarial Robustness in Neural Networks Teacher-student relationship and teaching styles in primary education. A model of analysis Monitoring road infrastructures from satellite images in Greater Maputo: an object-oriented classification approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1