选择不参加急诊科筛查的干预措施大大提高了梅毒诊断率

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae490
Kimberly A Stanford, Joseph Mason, Eleanor Friedman, Aniruddha Hazra, Erin Augustine, John Schneider
{"title":"选择不参加急诊科筛查的干预措施大大提高了梅毒诊断率","authors":"Kimberly A Stanford, Joseph Mason, Eleanor Friedman, Aniruddha Hazra, Erin Augustine, John Schneider","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background With rising rates of syphilis in the U.S., novel strategies are needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly among priority populations such as pregnant people. As the primary source of healthcare for many communities with limited access to care, the emergency department (ED) visit represents a crucial opportunity for syphilis detection and congenital syphilis prevention. Methods This pre-post design study examined all ED encounters for two-year periods before and after implementation of an opt-out ED syphilis screening intervention in May 2019 at a large, urban, academic ED. Data on laboratory testing, syphilis status, and demographics were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine trends in syphilis screening and diagnosis. Results Syphilis screening increased from 5209 (3.6%) to 37,289 (24.4%) encounters. Presumed active syphilis infection (PAI) increased 288%, from 161 patients (3.1% of those screened) to 624 (1.7%). The proportion of female PAI increased from 25.6% to 42.5%, despite no change in proportion of females screened. Post-intervention, 23.6% of PAI were tested for a urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the ED and 9.0% presented with symptoms of an STI by diagnosis code. Among pregnant people, screening increased from 5.9% to 49.9% of encounters, and syphilis diagnosis increased 750%, from 2 cases to 15. Conclusions Opt-out ED syphilis screening led to a dramatic increase in screening and diagnosis, especially among pregnant individuals, a priority population for congenital syphilis prevention. Most individuals with syphilis did not have STI symptoms. Opt-out screening will be an important strategy in the effort to address the syphilis epidemic.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Opt-out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly A Stanford, Joseph Mason, Eleanor Friedman, Aniruddha Hazra, Erin Augustine, John Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae490\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background With rising rates of syphilis in the U.S., novel strategies are needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly among priority populations such as pregnant people. As the primary source of healthcare for many communities with limited access to care, the emergency department (ED) visit represents a crucial opportunity for syphilis detection and congenital syphilis prevention. Methods This pre-post design study examined all ED encounters for two-year periods before and after implementation of an opt-out ED syphilis screening intervention in May 2019 at a large, urban, academic ED. Data on laboratory testing, syphilis status, and demographics were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine trends in syphilis screening and diagnosis. Results Syphilis screening increased from 5209 (3.6%) to 37,289 (24.4%) encounters. Presumed active syphilis infection (PAI) increased 288%, from 161 patients (3.1% of those screened) to 624 (1.7%). The proportion of female PAI increased from 25.6% to 42.5%, despite no change in proportion of females screened. Post-intervention, 23.6% of PAI were tested for a urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the ED and 9.0% presented with symptoms of an STI by diagnosis code. Among pregnant people, screening increased from 5.9% to 49.9% of encounters, and syphilis diagnosis increased 750%, from 2 cases to 15. Conclusions Opt-out ED syphilis screening led to a dramatic increase in screening and diagnosis, especially among pregnant individuals, a priority population for congenital syphilis prevention. Most individuals with syphilis did not have STI symptoms. Opt-out screening will be an important strategy in the effort to address the syphilis epidemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae490\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景随着美国梅毒发病率的不断上升,需要采取新的策略来提高早期诊断率,尤其是在孕妇等重点人群中。急诊科(ED)是许多医疗条件有限的社区的主要医疗渠道,是梅毒检测和先天性梅毒预防的重要机会。方法 本研究采用前后对比的设计方法,对一家大型城市学术性急诊科在2019年5月实施选择不接受急诊科梅毒筛查干预措施前后两年内的所有急诊科就诊情况进行了调查。从病历中提取了有关实验室检测、梅毒状态和人口统计学的数据。使用描述性统计和逻辑回归来研究梅毒筛查和诊断的趋势。结果 梅毒筛查从 5209 例(3.6%)增加到 37289 例(24.4%)。推定梅毒感染(PAI)增加了288%,从161人(占筛查人数的3.1%)增加到624人(占1.7%)。尽管女性接受筛查的比例没有变化,但女性 PAI 的比例从 25.6% 上升到 42.5%。干预后,23.6% 的 PAI 在急诊室接受了泌尿生殖系统性传播感染 (STI) 检测,9.0% 的 PAI 出现了 STI 诊断代码症状。在孕妇中,筛查比例从 5.9% 增加到 49.9%,梅毒诊断从 2 例增加到 15 例,增幅达 750%。结论 选择性退出 ED 梅毒筛查使筛查和诊断率大幅提高,尤其是在先天性梅毒预防的重点人群--孕妇中。大多数梅毒患者没有性传播感染症状。退出式筛查将成为应对梅毒流行的重要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Opt-out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis
Background With rising rates of syphilis in the U.S., novel strategies are needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly among priority populations such as pregnant people. As the primary source of healthcare for many communities with limited access to care, the emergency department (ED) visit represents a crucial opportunity for syphilis detection and congenital syphilis prevention. Methods This pre-post design study examined all ED encounters for two-year periods before and after implementation of an opt-out ED syphilis screening intervention in May 2019 at a large, urban, academic ED. Data on laboratory testing, syphilis status, and demographics were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine trends in syphilis screening and diagnosis. Results Syphilis screening increased from 5209 (3.6%) to 37,289 (24.4%) encounters. Presumed active syphilis infection (PAI) increased 288%, from 161 patients (3.1% of those screened) to 624 (1.7%). The proportion of female PAI increased from 25.6% to 42.5%, despite no change in proportion of females screened. Post-intervention, 23.6% of PAI were tested for a urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the ED and 9.0% presented with symptoms of an STI by diagnosis code. Among pregnant people, screening increased from 5.9% to 49.9% of encounters, and syphilis diagnosis increased 750%, from 2 cases to 15. Conclusions Opt-out ED syphilis screening led to a dramatic increase in screening and diagnosis, especially among pregnant individuals, a priority population for congenital syphilis prevention. Most individuals with syphilis did not have STI symptoms. Opt-out screening will be an important strategy in the effort to address the syphilis epidemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Low Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Resistance-Associated Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Lineages From Botswana. A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection. Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022. Impact of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Bordetella pertussis, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza Virus, and Seasonal Coronavirus Antibody Levels: A Systematic Review. Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1