大型学术医疗中心实施最新羊膜腔内感染指南

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae475
Casey Smiley, Jessica Rizzuto, Nicola White, Christina Fiske, Jennifer Thompson, Minhua Zhang, Ben Ereshefsky, Milner Staub
{"title":"大型学术医疗中心实施最新羊膜腔内感染指南","authors":"Casey Smiley, Jessica Rizzuto, Nicola White, Christina Fiske, Jennifer Thompson, Minhua Zhang, Ben Ereshefsky, Milner Staub","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Intraamniotic infection (IAI) affects 2%–5% of pregnancies, causing significant neonatal and maternal morbidity. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology suggests ampicillin and gentamicin as first-line IAI treatment. Due to potential drug toxicity, changes in gentamicin susceptibility cutoff points, and rising Enterobacterales gentamicin and ampicillin resistance, changes in IAI antibiotic treatment were implemented at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Methods Combination ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin were replaced by piperacillin-tazobactam in institutional IAI treatment. Implementation strategies included repeated education sessions to gain stakeholder trust and buy-in and changing preexisting electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDSTs) to a default selection of piperacillin-tazobactam, capitalizing on highly reliable intervention strategies of forcing function and automatization/computerization. Change in antibiotic use, measured in days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days present (1000PDP) by week initiated, before and after eCDST changes, was analyzed with interrupted time series analysis. Effects on hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30 day readmission were evaluated using multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results After updated eCDST go-live, piperacillin-tazobactam use increased by 1.9 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.1) by week initiated, and ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin use decreased by −2.5 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2) by week initiated. Hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30-day readmission rate did not significantly change. Conclusions Forced function changes to existing eCDSTs, supported by stakeholder education, successfully changed IAI empiric antibiotic use without unintended patient safety consequences.","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Updated Intraamniotic Infection Guidelines at a Large Academic Medical Center\",\"authors\":\"Casey Smiley, Jessica Rizzuto, Nicola White, Christina Fiske, Jennifer Thompson, Minhua Zhang, Ben Ereshefsky, Milner Staub\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Intraamniotic infection (IAI) affects 2%–5% of pregnancies, causing significant neonatal and maternal morbidity. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology suggests ampicillin and gentamicin as first-line IAI treatment. Due to potential drug toxicity, changes in gentamicin susceptibility cutoff points, and rising Enterobacterales gentamicin and ampicillin resistance, changes in IAI antibiotic treatment were implemented at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Methods Combination ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin were replaced by piperacillin-tazobactam in institutional IAI treatment. Implementation strategies included repeated education sessions to gain stakeholder trust and buy-in and changing preexisting electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDSTs) to a default selection of piperacillin-tazobactam, capitalizing on highly reliable intervention strategies of forcing function and automatization/computerization. Change in antibiotic use, measured in days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days present (1000PDP) by week initiated, before and after eCDST changes, was analyzed with interrupted time series analysis. Effects on hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30 day readmission were evaluated using multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results After updated eCDST go-live, piperacillin-tazobactam use increased by 1.9 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.1) by week initiated, and ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin use decreased by −2.5 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2) by week initiated. Hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30-day readmission rate did not significantly change. Conclusions Forced function changes to existing eCDSTs, supported by stakeholder education, successfully changed IAI empiric antibiotic use without unintended patient safety consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae475\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 羊膜腔内感染(IAI)影响 2%-5%的妊娠,导致严重的新生儿和孕产妇发病率。美国妇产科学会建议将氨苄西林和庆大霉素作为羊膜腔内感染的一线治疗药物。由于潜在的药物毒性、庆大霉素敏感性临界点的变化以及肠杆菌对庆大霉素和氨苄西林耐药性的上升,范德比尔特大学医学中心对 IAI 抗生素治疗进行了调整。方法 在医院的肠道感染治疗中,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦取代了氨苄西林、庆大霉素和林可霉素的复方制剂。实施策略包括反复开展教育活动以获得利益相关者的信任和支持,以及利用强制功能和自动化/计算机化等高度可靠的干预策略,将原有的电子临床决策支持工具(eCDST)改为默认选择哌拉西林-他唑巴坦。采用间断时间序列分析法分析了 eCDST 更改前后抗生素使用量的变化(以治疗天数 (DOT)/1000 病人住院日 (1000PDP) 计算)。使用多变量线性回归和逻辑回归评估了对住院时间、14 天内重复使用抗生素和 30 天再入院的影响。结果 eCDST 更新上线后,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦的使用量在开始使用的一周内增加了 1.9 DOT/1000PDP(95% CI,0.7 至 3.1),而氨苄西林、庆大霉素和克林霉素的使用量在开始使用的一周内减少了-2.5 DOT/1000PDP(95% CI,-3.8 至-1.2)。住院时间、14 天内重复使用抗生素以及 30 天再入院率均无明显变化。结论 在利益相关者教育的支持下,对现有 eCDST 的强制功能更改成功地改变了 IAI 经验性抗生素的使用,而不会对患者安全造成意外影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing Updated Intraamniotic Infection Guidelines at a Large Academic Medical Center
Background Intraamniotic infection (IAI) affects 2%–5% of pregnancies, causing significant neonatal and maternal morbidity. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology suggests ampicillin and gentamicin as first-line IAI treatment. Due to potential drug toxicity, changes in gentamicin susceptibility cutoff points, and rising Enterobacterales gentamicin and ampicillin resistance, changes in IAI antibiotic treatment were implemented at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Methods Combination ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin were replaced by piperacillin-tazobactam in institutional IAI treatment. Implementation strategies included repeated education sessions to gain stakeholder trust and buy-in and changing preexisting electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDSTs) to a default selection of piperacillin-tazobactam, capitalizing on highly reliable intervention strategies of forcing function and automatization/computerization. Change in antibiotic use, measured in days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days present (1000PDP) by week initiated, before and after eCDST changes, was analyzed with interrupted time series analysis. Effects on hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30 day readmission were evaluated using multivariable linear and logistic regression. Results After updated eCDST go-live, piperacillin-tazobactam use increased by 1.9 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.1) by week initiated, and ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin use decreased by −2.5 DOT/1000PDP (95% CI, −3.8 to −1.2) by week initiated. Hospital length of stay, repeat antibiotics within 14 days, and 30-day readmission rate did not significantly change. Conclusions Forced function changes to existing eCDSTs, supported by stakeholder education, successfully changed IAI empiric antibiotic use without unintended patient safety consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Low Prevalence of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Resistance-Associated Mutations in SARS-CoV-2 Lineages From Botswana. A Retrospective Assessment of Guideline Adherence and Treatment Outcomes From Clostridioides difficile Infection Following the IDSA 2021 Clinical Guideline Update: Clostridioides difficile Infection. Has Ghana's Rotavirus Vaccine Switch Met Programmatic Expectations? An Analysis of National Surveillance Data; 2018-2022. Impact of COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions on Bordetella pertussis, Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Influenza Virus, and Seasonal Coronavirus Antibody Levels: A Systematic Review. Severe Optic Neuropathy Induced by Very Prolonged Tedizolid as Suppressive Therapy: Description of a Case Report and Implication for Better Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1