根据支气管肺泡灌洗液结果判断疑似肺炎重症患者的抗生素减量模式和疗效

Mengou Zhu, Chiagozie O Pickens, Nikolay S Markov, Anna E Pawlowski, Mengjia Kang, Luke V Rasmussen, James M Walter, Nandita R Nadig, Benjamin D Singer, Richard G Wunderink, Catherine A Gao, The NU SCRIPT Investigators
{"title":"根据支气管肺泡灌洗液结果判断疑似肺炎重症患者的抗生素减量模式和疗效","authors":"Mengou Zhu, Chiagozie O Pickens, Nikolay S Markov, Anna E Pawlowski, Mengjia Kang, Luke V Rasmussen, James M Walter, Nandita R Nadig, Benjamin D Singer, Richard G Wunderink, Catherine A Gao, The NU SCRIPT Investigators","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotic stewardship in critically ill pneumonia patients is crucial yet challenging, partly due to the limited diagnostic yield of noninvasive infectious tests. In this study, we report an antibiotic prescription pattern informed by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results, where clinicians de-escalate antibiotics based on the combination of quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests. Methods: We analyzed data from SCRIPT, a single-center prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients who underwent a BAL for suspected pneumonia. We used the novel Narrow Antibiotic Therapy (NAT) score to quantify day-by-day antibiotic prescription pattern for each suspected pneumonia episode etiology (bacterial, viral, mixed bacterial/viral, microbiology-negative, and non-pneumonia control). We also analyzed and compared clinical outcomes for each pneumonia etiology, including unfavorable outcomes (a composite of in-hospital mortality, discharge to hospice, or requiring lung transplantation during hospitalization), duration of ICU stay, and duration of intubation. Clinical outcomes were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: We included 686 patients with 927 pneumonia episodes. NAT score analysis indicated that an antibiotic de-escalation pattern was evident in all pneumonia etiologies except resistant bacterial pneumonia. Microbiology-negative pneumonia was treated similarly to susceptible bacterial pneumonia in terms of antibiotic spectrum. Over a quarter of the time in viral pneumonia episodes, antibiotics were completely discontinued. Unfavorable outcomes were comparable across all pneumonia etiologies. Patients with viral and mixed bacterial/viral pneumonia had longer durations of ICU stay and intubation.\nConclusions: BAL quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests resulted in prompt antibiotic de-escalation in critically ill pneumonia patients. There was no evidence of increased incidence of unfavorable outcomes.","PeriodicalId":501509,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic De-escalation Patterns and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Pneumonia as Informed by Bronchoalveolar Lavage Results\",\"authors\":\"Mengou Zhu, Chiagozie O Pickens, Nikolay S Markov, Anna E Pawlowski, Mengjia Kang, Luke V Rasmussen, James M Walter, Nandita R Nadig, Benjamin D Singer, Richard G Wunderink, Catherine A Gao, The NU SCRIPT Investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Antibiotic stewardship in critically ill pneumonia patients is crucial yet challenging, partly due to the limited diagnostic yield of noninvasive infectious tests. In this study, we report an antibiotic prescription pattern informed by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results, where clinicians de-escalate antibiotics based on the combination of quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests. Methods: We analyzed data from SCRIPT, a single-center prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients who underwent a BAL for suspected pneumonia. We used the novel Narrow Antibiotic Therapy (NAT) score to quantify day-by-day antibiotic prescription pattern for each suspected pneumonia episode etiology (bacterial, viral, mixed bacterial/viral, microbiology-negative, and non-pneumonia control). We also analyzed and compared clinical outcomes for each pneumonia etiology, including unfavorable outcomes (a composite of in-hospital mortality, discharge to hospice, or requiring lung transplantation during hospitalization), duration of ICU stay, and duration of intubation. Clinical outcomes were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: We included 686 patients with 927 pneumonia episodes. NAT score analysis indicated that an antibiotic de-escalation pattern was evident in all pneumonia etiologies except resistant bacterial pneumonia. Microbiology-negative pneumonia was treated similarly to susceptible bacterial pneumonia in terms of antibiotic spectrum. Over a quarter of the time in viral pneumonia episodes, antibiotics were completely discontinued. Unfavorable outcomes were comparable across all pneumonia etiologies. Patients with viral and mixed bacterial/viral pneumonia had longer durations of ICU stay and intubation.\\nConclusions: BAL quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests resulted in prompt antibiotic de-escalation in critically ill pneumonia patients. There was no evidence of increased incidence of unfavorable outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺炎重症患者的抗生素管理至关重要,但却极具挑战性,部分原因在于无创感染性检查的诊断率有限。在本研究中,我们报告了一种以支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)结果为依据的抗生素处方模式,临床医生在结合定量培养和多重 PCR 快速诊断检测的基础上降低抗生素用量。方法:我们分析了 SCRIPT 的数据,这是一项针对因疑似肺炎而接受 BAL 检查的机械通气患者的单中心前瞻性队列研究。我们使用新型窄谱抗生素疗法(NAT)评分来量化每种疑似肺炎病因(细菌、病毒、细菌/病毒混合感染、微生物阴性和非肺炎控制)的逐日抗生素处方模式。我们还分析并比较了每种肺炎病因的临床结果,包括不利结果(院内死亡、出院后接受临终关怀或住院期间需要肺移植的综合结果)、重症监护室住院时间和插管时间。临床结果采用曼-惠特尼U检验和费雪精确检验进行比较。结果我们共纳入了 686 名患者,927 次肺炎发作。NAT 评分分析表明,除耐药细菌性肺炎外,所有肺炎病因中抗生素降级模式都很明显。就抗生素谱而言,微生物阴性肺炎的治疗与易感细菌性肺炎相似。在病毒性肺炎病例中,超过四分之一的患者完全停用了抗生素。所有肺炎病因造成的不良后果不相上下。病毒性肺炎和细菌/病毒混合性肺炎患者在重症监护室的住院时间和插管时间较长:结论:肺泡定量培养和多重 PCR 快速诊断检测可使重症肺炎患者及时停用抗生素。没有证据表明不利后果的发生率会增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic De-escalation Patterns and Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Pneumonia as Informed by Bronchoalveolar Lavage Results
Background: Antibiotic stewardship in critically ill pneumonia patients is crucial yet challenging, partly due to the limited diagnostic yield of noninvasive infectious tests. In this study, we report an antibiotic prescription pattern informed by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results, where clinicians de-escalate antibiotics based on the combination of quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests. Methods: We analyzed data from SCRIPT, a single-center prospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients who underwent a BAL for suspected pneumonia. We used the novel Narrow Antibiotic Therapy (NAT) score to quantify day-by-day antibiotic prescription pattern for each suspected pneumonia episode etiology (bacterial, viral, mixed bacterial/viral, microbiology-negative, and non-pneumonia control). We also analyzed and compared clinical outcomes for each pneumonia etiology, including unfavorable outcomes (a composite of in-hospital mortality, discharge to hospice, or requiring lung transplantation during hospitalization), duration of ICU stay, and duration of intubation. Clinical outcomes were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test. Results: We included 686 patients with 927 pneumonia episodes. NAT score analysis indicated that an antibiotic de-escalation pattern was evident in all pneumonia etiologies except resistant bacterial pneumonia. Microbiology-negative pneumonia was treated similarly to susceptible bacterial pneumonia in terms of antibiotic spectrum. Over a quarter of the time in viral pneumonia episodes, antibiotics were completely discontinued. Unfavorable outcomes were comparable across all pneumonia etiologies. Patients with viral and mixed bacterial/viral pneumonia had longer durations of ICU stay and intubation. Conclusions: BAL quantitative cultures and multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic tests resulted in prompt antibiotic de-escalation in critically ill pneumonia patients. There was no evidence of increased incidence of unfavorable outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reactogenicity and immunogenicity against MPXV of the intradermal administration of Modified V Vaccinia Ankara compared to the standard subcutaneous route. A next generation CRISPR diagnostic tool to survey drug resistance in Human African Trypanosomiasis. Hospital-onset bacteraemia and fungaemia as a novel automated surveillance indicator: results from four European university hospitals Integration of Group A Streptococcus Rapid Tests with the Open Fluidic CandyCollect Device Deep Learning Models for Predicting the Nugent Score to Diagnose Bacterial Vaginosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1