Aidan Li, Liyan Wang, Tianye Dou, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal
{"title":"探索随机漫步 Metropolis 算法和并行调节算法中 0.234 最佳接受率的通用性","authors":"Aidan Li, Liyan Wang, Tianye Dou, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal","doi":"arxiv-2408.06894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For random-walk Metropolis (RWM) and parallel tempering (PT) algorithms, an\nasymptotic acceptance rate of around 0.234 is known to be optimal in the\nhigh-dimensional limit. Yet, the practical relevance of this value is uncertain\ndue to the restrictive conditions underlying its derivation. We synthesise\nprevious theoretical advances in extending the 0.234 acceptance rate to more\ngeneral settings, and demonstrate the applicability and generalizability of the\n0.234 theory for practitioners with a comprehensive empirical simulation study\non a variety of examples examining how acceptance rates affect Expected Squared\nJumping Distance (ESJD). Our experiments show the optimality of the 0.234\nacceptance rate for RWM is surprisingly robust even in lower dimensions across\nvarious proposal and multimodal target distributions which may or may not have\nan i.i.d. product density. Experiments on parallel tempering also show that the\nidealized 0.234 spacing of inverse temperatures may be approximately optimal\nfor low dimensions and non i.i.d. product target densities, and that\nconstructing an inverse temperature ladder with spacings given by a swap\nacceptance of 0.234 is a viable strategy. However, we observe the applicability\nof the 0.234 acceptance rate heuristic diminishes for both RWM and PT\nalgorithms below a certain dimension which differs based on the target density,\nand that inhomogeneously scaled components in the target density further\nreduces its applicability in lower dimensions.","PeriodicalId":501215,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Computation","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the generalizability of the optimal 0.234 acceptance rate in random-walk Metropolis and parallel tempering algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Aidan Li, Liyan Wang, Tianye Dou, Jeffrey S. Rosenthal\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.06894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For random-walk Metropolis (RWM) and parallel tempering (PT) algorithms, an\\nasymptotic acceptance rate of around 0.234 is known to be optimal in the\\nhigh-dimensional limit. Yet, the practical relevance of this value is uncertain\\ndue to the restrictive conditions underlying its derivation. We synthesise\\nprevious theoretical advances in extending the 0.234 acceptance rate to more\\ngeneral settings, and demonstrate the applicability and generalizability of the\\n0.234 theory for practitioners with a comprehensive empirical simulation study\\non a variety of examples examining how acceptance rates affect Expected Squared\\nJumping Distance (ESJD). Our experiments show the optimality of the 0.234\\nacceptance rate for RWM is surprisingly robust even in lower dimensions across\\nvarious proposal and multimodal target distributions which may or may not have\\nan i.i.d. product density. Experiments on parallel tempering also show that the\\nidealized 0.234 spacing of inverse temperatures may be approximately optimal\\nfor low dimensions and non i.i.d. product target densities, and that\\nconstructing an inverse temperature ladder with spacings given by a swap\\nacceptance of 0.234 is a viable strategy. However, we observe the applicability\\nof the 0.234 acceptance rate heuristic diminishes for both RWM and PT\\nalgorithms below a certain dimension which differs based on the target density,\\nand that inhomogeneously scaled components in the target density further\\nreduces its applicability in lower dimensions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Computation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.06894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the generalizability of the optimal 0.234 acceptance rate in random-walk Metropolis and parallel tempering algorithms
For random-walk Metropolis (RWM) and parallel tempering (PT) algorithms, an
asymptotic acceptance rate of around 0.234 is known to be optimal in the
high-dimensional limit. Yet, the practical relevance of this value is uncertain
due to the restrictive conditions underlying its derivation. We synthesise
previous theoretical advances in extending the 0.234 acceptance rate to more
general settings, and demonstrate the applicability and generalizability of the
0.234 theory for practitioners with a comprehensive empirical simulation study
on a variety of examples examining how acceptance rates affect Expected Squared
Jumping Distance (ESJD). Our experiments show the optimality of the 0.234
acceptance rate for RWM is surprisingly robust even in lower dimensions across
various proposal and multimodal target distributions which may or may not have
an i.i.d. product density. Experiments on parallel tempering also show that the
idealized 0.234 spacing of inverse temperatures may be approximately optimal
for low dimensions and non i.i.d. product target densities, and that
constructing an inverse temperature ladder with spacings given by a swap
acceptance of 0.234 is a viable strategy. However, we observe the applicability
of the 0.234 acceptance rate heuristic diminishes for both RWM and PT
algorithms below a certain dimension which differs based on the target density,
and that inhomogeneously scaled components in the target density further
reduces its applicability in lower dimensions.