Comparison of strength and adulteration between illicit drugs obtained from cryptomarkets versus off‐line

Background and aimsDrugs sold on cryptomarkets are thought to have lower levels of adulteration and higher strength compared with those sourced off‐line. The present study aimed to determine whether cryptomarket and off‐line‐sourced 3,4‐methylenedioxy‐N‐methamphetamine (MDMA), cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) differed in adulteration and strength.Design and settingA between‐groups design was used to compare cryptomarket versus off‐line‐sourced drugs. Regression analyses controlling for year and service were conducted. Drug‐checking services were conducted in Spain (Energy Control) and the Netherlands (Drugs Information and Monitoring System).CasesThe cases comprised drug samples that underwent drug checking between 2016 and 2021 and were expected to contain MDMA (tablets; n = 36 065; powder: n = 6179), cocaine (n = 11 419), amphetamine (n = 6823), methamphetamine (n = 293) and LSD (n = 1817).MeasurementsDrugs were measured for (1) matching the advertised substance (i.e. containing any amount of the expected substance); (2) strength; (3) presence of adulteration; and (4) number of adulterants.FindingsThe expected drug was more likely to be identified when sourced from cryptomarkets versus off‐line for MDMA tablets [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.28–3.43], MDMA powder (AOR = 2.64, CI = 1.55–4.51), cocaine (AOR = 3.65, CI = 1.98–6.71) and LSD (AOR = 1.75, CI = 1.13–2.72). Cryptomarket‐sourced MDMA powder (β = 0.03, P = 0.012), cocaine (β = 0.08, P < 0.001) and methamphetamine (β = 0.15, P = 0.028) were statistically significantly higher in strength than substances from off‐line sources. Conversely, MDMA tablets (β = −0.01, P = 0.043) and amphetamine (β = −0.07, P < 0.001) from cryptomarkets were statistically significantly lower in strength than from off‐line sources. MDMA powder (AOR = 0.53, CI = 0.33–0.86) and cocaine (AOR = 0.66, CI = 0.55–0.79) were statistically significantly less likely to be adulterated if sourced from cryptomarkets. However, amphetamine (AOR = 1.54, CI = 1.25–1.90) and LSD (AOR = 1.31, CI = 1.00–1.71) were found to be more likely to be adulterated when purchased from cryptomarkets. Cocaine from cryptomarkets exhibited fewer adulterants (incidence rate ratio = 0.71, CI = 0.60–0.85).ConclusionThe relationship between on‐line drug market‐places and substance quality varies depending on both the specific substance and the dynamics of the cryptomarket.