Christian A.E. Westrip, Stephen J. Smerdon, Mathew L. Coleman
{"title":"重构同类 DRG/DFRP 复合物中的蛋白质结合特异性","authors":"Christian A.E. Westrip, Stephen J. Smerdon, Mathew L. Coleman","doi":"10.1016/j.str.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eukaryotes have two paralogous developmentally regulated GTP-binding (DRG) proteins: DRG1 and DRG2, both of which have a conserved binding partner called DRG family regulatory protein 1 and 2 (DFRP1 and DFRP2), respectively. DFRPs are important for the function of DRGs and interact with their respective DRG via a conserved region called the DFRP domain. Despite being highly similar, DRG1 and DRG2 have strict binding specificity for their respective DFRP. Using AlphaFold generated structure models of the human DRG/DFRP complexes, we have biochemically characterized their interactions and identified interface residues involved in determining specificity. This analysis revealed that as few as five mutations in DRG1 can switch binding from DFRP1 to DFRP2. Moreover, while DFRP1 binding confers increased stability and GTPase activity to DRG1, DFRP2 binding only supports increased stability. Overall, this work provides new insight into the structural determinants responsible for the binding specificities of the DRG/DFRP complexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22168,"journal":{"name":"Structure","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rewiring protein binding specificity in paralogous DRG/DFRP complexes\",\"authors\":\"Christian A.E. Westrip, Stephen J. Smerdon, Mathew L. Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.str.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Eukaryotes have two paralogous developmentally regulated GTP-binding (DRG) proteins: DRG1 and DRG2, both of which have a conserved binding partner called DRG family regulatory protein 1 and 2 (DFRP1 and DFRP2), respectively. DFRPs are important for the function of DRGs and interact with their respective DRG via a conserved region called the DFRP domain. Despite being highly similar, DRG1 and DRG2 have strict binding specificity for their respective DFRP. Using AlphaFold generated structure models of the human DRG/DFRP complexes, we have biochemically characterized their interactions and identified interface residues involved in determining specificity. This analysis revealed that as few as five mutations in DRG1 can switch binding from DFRP1 to DFRP2. Moreover, while DFRP1 binding confers increased stability and GTPase activity to DRG1, DFRP2 binding only supports increased stability. Overall, this work provides new insight into the structural determinants responsible for the binding specificities of the DRG/DFRP complexes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structure\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rewiring protein binding specificity in paralogous DRG/DFRP complexes
Eukaryotes have two paralogous developmentally regulated GTP-binding (DRG) proteins: DRG1 and DRG2, both of which have a conserved binding partner called DRG family regulatory protein 1 and 2 (DFRP1 and DFRP2), respectively. DFRPs are important for the function of DRGs and interact with their respective DRG via a conserved region called the DFRP domain. Despite being highly similar, DRG1 and DRG2 have strict binding specificity for their respective DFRP. Using AlphaFold generated structure models of the human DRG/DFRP complexes, we have biochemically characterized their interactions and identified interface residues involved in determining specificity. This analysis revealed that as few as five mutations in DRG1 can switch binding from DFRP1 to DFRP2. Moreover, while DFRP1 binding confers increased stability and GTPase activity to DRG1, DFRP2 binding only supports increased stability. Overall, this work provides new insight into the structural determinants responsible for the binding specificities of the DRG/DFRP complexes.
期刊介绍:
Structure aims to publish papers of exceptional interest in the field of structural biology. The journal strives to be essential reading for structural biologists, as well as biologists and biochemists that are interested in macromolecular structure and function. Structure strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that present structural and molecular insights into biological function and mechanism. Other reports that address fundamental questions in structural biology, such as structure-based examinations of protein evolution, folding, and/or design, will also be considered. We will consider the application of any method, experimental or computational, at high or low resolution, to conduct structural investigations, as long as the method is appropriate for the biological, functional, and mechanistic question(s) being addressed. Likewise, reports describing single-molecule analysis of biological mechanisms are welcome.
In general, the editors encourage submission of experimental structural studies that are enriched by an analysis of structure-activity relationships and will not consider studies that solely report structural information unless the structure or analysis is of exceptional and broad interest. Studies reporting only homology models, de novo models, or molecular dynamics simulations are also discouraged unless the models are informed by or validated by novel experimental data; rationalization of a large body of existing experimental evidence and making testable predictions based on a model or simulation is often not considered sufficient.