抗生素和热疗对消除柑橘芽材中的抗菌杆菌效果有限

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY European Journal of Plant Pathology Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s10658-024-02939-5
Leandra Oliveira Magalhães, Uiara Souza, Laudecir Lemos Raiol-Júnior, Everton Vieira de Carvalho, Alécio Souza Moreira, Juliana de Freitas-Astúa, Eduardo Augusto Girardi, Abelmon da Silva Gesteira
{"title":"抗生素和热疗对消除柑橘芽材中的抗菌杆菌效果有限","authors":"Leandra Oliveira Magalhães, Uiara Souza, Laudecir Lemos Raiol-Júnior, Everton Vieira de Carvalho, Alécio Souza Moreira, Juliana de Freitas-Astúa, Eduardo Augusto Girardi, Abelmon da Silva Gesteira","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02939-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Epigenetic markers related to resistance require regenerating healthy trees from previously infected plant tissues. Thus, sanitizing and regenerating healthy citrus plants from previously <i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)-infected tissues constitute a valuable need for breeding programs. Immersion in ampicillin + streptomycin solution and thermotherapy were evaluated separately for eliminating CLas from infected citrus propagules. Valencia sweet orange (<i>Citrus</i> × <i>sinensis</i>) and trifoliate orange (<i>Citrus trifoliata</i>) were chosen as genotypes that were highly and moderately susceptible to CLas, respectively. Infected budwood was used to graft nucellar material with or without CLas. Thirty-two months after inoculation, 2.5-cm grafts were collected and treated by 12 h immersion in an antibiotic solution (1 g/L ampicillin + 0.1 g/L streptomycin) or in autoclaved Milli-Q water, and subsequently grafted onto Rangpur lime (<i>C.</i> × <i>limonia</i>) rootstocks. In a second experiment, thermotherapy was evaluated for treating stem cuttings kept for 0, 1.5 and 10 min at 55 °C in a water bath. The antibiotics did not influence plant regeneration, but CLas was effectively eliminated from only 22.2% of the infected propagules of trifoliate orange up to 15 months after treatment. Thermotherapy at 55 °C for 1.5 min was ineffective in completely suppressing CLas from trifoliate orange plants eight months after treatment, and was harmful to citrus propagation, notably sweet orange. Antibiotic treatment did not eliminate CLas in sweet orange propagules, but a decrease in titer was recorded for both genotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotics and thermotherapy have limited effectiveness in eliminating Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from citrus budwood\",\"authors\":\"Leandra Oliveira Magalhães, Uiara Souza, Laudecir Lemos Raiol-Júnior, Everton Vieira de Carvalho, Alécio Souza Moreira, Juliana de Freitas-Astúa, Eduardo Augusto Girardi, Abelmon da Silva Gesteira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10658-024-02939-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Epigenetic markers related to resistance require regenerating healthy trees from previously infected plant tissues. Thus, sanitizing and regenerating healthy citrus plants from previously <i>Candidatus</i> Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)-infected tissues constitute a valuable need for breeding programs. Immersion in ampicillin + streptomycin solution and thermotherapy were evaluated separately for eliminating CLas from infected citrus propagules. Valencia sweet orange (<i>Citrus</i> × <i>sinensis</i>) and trifoliate orange (<i>Citrus trifoliata</i>) were chosen as genotypes that were highly and moderately susceptible to CLas, respectively. Infected budwood was used to graft nucellar material with or without CLas. Thirty-two months after inoculation, 2.5-cm grafts were collected and treated by 12 h immersion in an antibiotic solution (1 g/L ampicillin + 0.1 g/L streptomycin) or in autoclaved Milli-Q water, and subsequently grafted onto Rangpur lime (<i>C.</i> × <i>limonia</i>) rootstocks. In a second experiment, thermotherapy was evaluated for treating stem cuttings kept for 0, 1.5 and 10 min at 55 °C in a water bath. The antibiotics did not influence plant regeneration, but CLas was effectively eliminated from only 22.2% of the infected propagules of trifoliate orange up to 15 months after treatment. Thermotherapy at 55 °C for 1.5 min was ineffective in completely suppressing CLas from trifoliate orange plants eight months after treatment, and was harmful to citrus propagation, notably sweet orange. Antibiotic treatment did not eliminate CLas in sweet orange propagules, but a decrease in titer was recorded for both genotypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02939-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02939-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与抗性相关的表观遗传标记需要从先前感染的植物组织中再生出健康的树木。因此,从以前感染过的带菌柑橘(CLas)组织中消毒并再生出健康的柑橘植株是育种计划的一个重要需求。在氨苄西林+链霉素溶液中浸泡和热疗分别对消除受感染柑橘繁殖体中的 CLas 进行了评估。巴伦西亚甜橙(Citrus × sinensis)和三叶橙(Citrus trifoliata)分别被选为对 CLas 高度和中度易感的基因型。受感染的芽木被用来嫁接带有或不带有 CLas 的核果材料。接种 32 个月后,收集 2.5 厘米的接穗,在抗生素溶液(1 克/升氨苄青霉素 + 0.1 克/升链霉素)或高压灭菌的 Milli-Q 水中浸泡 12 小时,然后嫁接到兰普尔石灰(C. × limonia)砧木上。在第二项实验中,评估了在 55 °C 水浴中分别保持 0、1.5 和 10 分钟的热疗法处理茎插条的效果。抗生素对植物再生没有影响,但在处理后 15 个月内,只有 22.2%的三叶橙感染繁殖体能有效清除 CLas。55 °C、1.5 分钟的热疗法无法在处理 8 个月后完全抑制三叶橙植株上的 CLas,而且对柑橘(尤其是甜橙)的繁殖有害。抗生素处理并未消除甜橙繁殖体中的 CLas,但两种基因型的滴度都有所下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotics and thermotherapy have limited effectiveness in eliminating Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from citrus budwood

Epigenetic markers related to resistance require regenerating healthy trees from previously infected plant tissues. Thus, sanitizing and regenerating healthy citrus plants from previously Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas)-infected tissues constitute a valuable need for breeding programs. Immersion in ampicillin + streptomycin solution and thermotherapy were evaluated separately for eliminating CLas from infected citrus propagules. Valencia sweet orange (Citrus × sinensis) and trifoliate orange (Citrus trifoliata) were chosen as genotypes that were highly and moderately susceptible to CLas, respectively. Infected budwood was used to graft nucellar material with or without CLas. Thirty-two months after inoculation, 2.5-cm grafts were collected and treated by 12 h immersion in an antibiotic solution (1 g/L ampicillin + 0.1 g/L streptomycin) or in autoclaved Milli-Q water, and subsequently grafted onto Rangpur lime (C. × limonia) rootstocks. In a second experiment, thermotherapy was evaluated for treating stem cuttings kept for 0, 1.5 and 10 min at 55 °C in a water bath. The antibiotics did not influence plant regeneration, but CLas was effectively eliminated from only 22.2% of the infected propagules of trifoliate orange up to 15 months after treatment. Thermotherapy at 55 °C for 1.5 min was ineffective in completely suppressing CLas from trifoliate orange plants eight months after treatment, and was harmful to citrus propagation, notably sweet orange. Antibiotic treatment did not eliminate CLas in sweet orange propagules, but a decrease in titer was recorded for both genotypes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Plant Pathology
European Journal of Plant Pathology 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Plant Pathology is an international journal publishing original articles in English dealing with fundamental and applied aspects of plant pathology; considering disease in agricultural and horticultural crops, forestry, and in natural plant populations. The types of articles published are :Original Research at the molecular, physiological, whole-plant and population levels; Mini-reviews on topics which are timely and of global rather than national or regional significance; Short Communications for important research findings that can be presented in an abbreviated format; and Letters-to-the-Editor, where these raise issues related to articles previously published in the journal. Submissions relating to disease vector biology and integrated crop protection are welcome. However, routine screenings of plant protection products, varietal trials for disease resistance, and biological control agents are not published in the journal unless framed in the context of strategic approaches to disease management.
期刊最新文献
Bioprospecting of wild botanicals against alternaria leaf blight of radish and their phytochemical profiling by GC–MS Aerial dispersal of Venturia inaequalis ascospores with under-canopy sprinkler irrigation for apple scab management Aerial dispersion of Xanthomonas fragariae during trimming leaves of angular leaf spot diseased strawberry propagation plants Characterization of the mycobiome of Pinus sylvestris L. seedlings damaged by forest animals, with an emphasis on pathogenic species Cryptic speciation in the nematode family Longidoridae from South America: description of Xiphinema cryptocostaricense sp. nov. from Colombia and notes on X. seinhorsti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1