{"title":"对棉花种植地土壤细菌的筛选显示,放线菌是体外分离出的对卵菌超微病菌具有拮抗活性的主要细菌群","authors":"Muriel Beltramino, Sofía Landoni, Mariana Grbich, Ezequiel Vuletic, Marina Bressano, Andrea Albarracín Orio","doi":"10.1007/s10658-024-02932-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The genus <i>Pythium</i> comprises approximately 120 species of oomycetes that inhabit diverse niches, ranging from terrestrial ecosystems to saltwater estuaries. While many species are strict soil saprophytes, others, such as <i>P. ultimum</i>, act as plant pathogens, causing diseases in a wide range of economically important crops. Current control measures for <i>P. ultimum</i> primarily rely on chemical applications to seeds and crops, as well as the use of resistant cultivars. However, the increasing emphasis on environmental conservation has led to the exploration of more sustainable agricultural alternatives, including biological control practices. In this study, we screened soil bacteria from cotton fields to identify isolates with controlling activity against this oomycete. Out of 100 bacterial isolates recovered, no effective antagonistic activity was observed among strains belonging to the genera <i>Bacillus</i> or <i>Pseudomonas</i>. The majority of controlling isolates were identified as various strains of actinobacteria, exhibiting distinct macroscopic characteristics and strong inhibition of <i>P. ultimum</i> growth. These actinobacterial strains caused significant macroscopic alterations in the oomycete mycelium, resulting in reduced density of its aerial structures. These promising findings highlight the potential of actinobacterial strains as biocontrol agents against one of the most problematic soil-borne plant pathogens, offering a viable alternative to chemical interventions in agriculture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12052,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening of soil bacteria from cotton cultivated fields reveals actinobacteria as the main group of isolates with antagonistic activity against the oomycete Pythium ultimum in vitro\",\"authors\":\"Muriel Beltramino, Sofía Landoni, Mariana Grbich, Ezequiel Vuletic, Marina Bressano, Andrea Albarracín Orio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10658-024-02932-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The genus <i>Pythium</i> comprises approximately 120 species of oomycetes that inhabit diverse niches, ranging from terrestrial ecosystems to saltwater estuaries. While many species are strict soil saprophytes, others, such as <i>P. ultimum</i>, act as plant pathogens, causing diseases in a wide range of economically important crops. Current control measures for <i>P. ultimum</i> primarily rely on chemical applications to seeds and crops, as well as the use of resistant cultivars. However, the increasing emphasis on environmental conservation has led to the exploration of more sustainable agricultural alternatives, including biological control practices. In this study, we screened soil bacteria from cotton fields to identify isolates with controlling activity against this oomycete. Out of 100 bacterial isolates recovered, no effective antagonistic activity was observed among strains belonging to the genera <i>Bacillus</i> or <i>Pseudomonas</i>. The majority of controlling isolates were identified as various strains of actinobacteria, exhibiting distinct macroscopic characteristics and strong inhibition of <i>P. ultimum</i> growth. These actinobacterial strains caused significant macroscopic alterations in the oomycete mycelium, resulting in reduced density of its aerial structures. These promising findings highlight the potential of actinobacterial strains as biocontrol agents against one of the most problematic soil-borne plant pathogens, offering a viable alternative to chemical interventions in agriculture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Plant Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02932-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Plant Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-024-02932-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
腐霉菌属由大约 120 种卵菌组成,栖息在从陆地生态系统到咸水河口的各种生境中。虽然许多菌种是严格的土壤营养体,但其他菌种,如最上端腐霉菌,则是植物病原体,可导致多种具有重要经济价值的作物发病。目前对 P. ultimum 的控制措施主要依赖于对种子和作物施用化学药剂,以及使用抗性栽培品种。然而,随着对环境保护的日益重视,人们开始探索更可持续的农业替代品,包括生物防治方法。在这项研究中,我们对棉田的土壤细菌进行了筛选,以确定对这种卵菌具有控制活性的分离物。在回收的 100 株细菌分离物中,没有观察到属于芽孢杆菌属或假单胞菌属的菌株具有有效的拮抗活性。大多数具有控制作用的分离菌株被鉴定为放线菌的各种菌株,它们表现出明显的宏观特征,并对超杀木霉菌的生长有很强的抑制作用。这些放线菌菌株对真菌菌丝造成了显著的宏观改变,导致其气生结构密度降低。这些充满希望的研究结果凸显了放线菌菌株作为生物控制剂对付最棘手的土传植物病原体之一的潜力,为农业中的化学干预提供了一种可行的替代方法。
Screening of soil bacteria from cotton cultivated fields reveals actinobacteria as the main group of isolates with antagonistic activity against the oomycete Pythium ultimum in vitro
The genus Pythium comprises approximately 120 species of oomycetes that inhabit diverse niches, ranging from terrestrial ecosystems to saltwater estuaries. While many species are strict soil saprophytes, others, such as P. ultimum, act as plant pathogens, causing diseases in a wide range of economically important crops. Current control measures for P. ultimum primarily rely on chemical applications to seeds and crops, as well as the use of resistant cultivars. However, the increasing emphasis on environmental conservation has led to the exploration of more sustainable agricultural alternatives, including biological control practices. In this study, we screened soil bacteria from cotton fields to identify isolates with controlling activity against this oomycete. Out of 100 bacterial isolates recovered, no effective antagonistic activity was observed among strains belonging to the genera Bacillus or Pseudomonas. The majority of controlling isolates were identified as various strains of actinobacteria, exhibiting distinct macroscopic characteristics and strong inhibition of P. ultimum growth. These actinobacterial strains caused significant macroscopic alterations in the oomycete mycelium, resulting in reduced density of its aerial structures. These promising findings highlight the potential of actinobacterial strains as biocontrol agents against one of the most problematic soil-borne plant pathogens, offering a viable alternative to chemical interventions in agriculture.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Plant Pathology is an international journal publishing original articles in English dealing with fundamental and applied aspects of plant pathology; considering disease in agricultural and horticultural crops, forestry, and in natural plant populations. The types of articles published are :Original Research at the molecular, physiological, whole-plant and population levels; Mini-reviews on topics which are timely and of global rather than national or regional significance; Short Communications for important research findings that can be presented in an abbreviated format; and Letters-to-the-Editor, where these raise issues related to articles previously published in the journal. Submissions relating to disease vector biology and integrated crop protection are welcome. However, routine screenings of plant protection products, varietal trials for disease resistance, and biological control agents are not published in the journal unless framed in the context of strategic approaches to disease management.