Vidisha Singh Rathaur, Nachiket Aashish Gokhale, Siddhartha Panda
{"title":"pH 对无柄液滴免疫测定中捕获效率和沉积模式的影响XDLVO 分析","authors":"Vidisha Singh Rathaur, Nachiket Aashish Gokhale, Siddhartha Panda","doi":"10.1063/5.0219301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immunosensors are crucial for various applications, with capture efficiency and detection time as key performance parameters. Sessile droplets on functionalized substrates have demonstrated potential as micro-reactors for antibody–antigen binding, reducing detection time and analyte volume due to the presence of convective currents. Tuning the surface charges by adjusting buffer pH can modulate antigen capture efficiency. While the impact of pH has been studied on antibody–antigen binding in flow and non-flow systems, the use of sessile droplets and the specific impact of buffer pH on the capture efficiency of surface-functionalized antibodies remains understudied. Understanding how pH affects capture and deposition patterns is vital for optimizing immunosensor design. Additionally, the mechanisms governing internal flow within the droplet and dominant driving forces require further investigation. We investigated the effect of varying buffer pH on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) capture by anti-PSA functionalized polydimethylsiloxane substrates. Capture efficiency was measured using the Brown–Anson model applied to cyclic voltammetry, validated with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. pH significantly influenced PSA capture by surface-immobilized anti-PSA IgG. The extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek theory explained the interplay between pH and internal flow. Micro-particle image velocimetry (PIV) confirmed internal flow, primarily driven by Marangoni flow from solute concentration gradients. Controlling buffer pH in biosensors offers higher capture efficiency and desired deposition patterns. These insights advance immunosensor design and hold potential for biomedical and diagnostic applications.","PeriodicalId":8855,"journal":{"name":"Biomicrofluidics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"pH effects on capture efficiency and deposition patterns in sessile droplet immunoassays: An XDLVO analysis\",\"authors\":\"Vidisha Singh Rathaur, Nachiket Aashish Gokhale, Siddhartha Panda\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0219301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Immunosensors are crucial for various applications, with capture efficiency and detection time as key performance parameters. Sessile droplets on functionalized substrates have demonstrated potential as micro-reactors for antibody–antigen binding, reducing detection time and analyte volume due to the presence of convective currents. Tuning the surface charges by adjusting buffer pH can modulate antigen capture efficiency. While the impact of pH has been studied on antibody–antigen binding in flow and non-flow systems, the use of sessile droplets and the specific impact of buffer pH on the capture efficiency of surface-functionalized antibodies remains understudied. Understanding how pH affects capture and deposition patterns is vital for optimizing immunosensor design. Additionally, the mechanisms governing internal flow within the droplet and dominant driving forces require further investigation. We investigated the effect of varying buffer pH on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) capture by anti-PSA functionalized polydimethylsiloxane substrates. Capture efficiency was measured using the Brown–Anson model applied to cyclic voltammetry, validated with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. pH significantly influenced PSA capture by surface-immobilized anti-PSA IgG. The extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek theory explained the interplay between pH and internal flow. Micro-particle image velocimetry (PIV) confirmed internal flow, primarily driven by Marangoni flow from solute concentration gradients. Controlling buffer pH in biosensors offers higher capture efficiency and desired deposition patterns. These insights advance immunosensor design and hold potential for biomedical and diagnostic applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomicrofluidics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomicrofluidics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219301\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomicrofluidics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
pH effects on capture efficiency and deposition patterns in sessile droplet immunoassays: An XDLVO analysis
Immunosensors are crucial for various applications, with capture efficiency and detection time as key performance parameters. Sessile droplets on functionalized substrates have demonstrated potential as micro-reactors for antibody–antigen binding, reducing detection time and analyte volume due to the presence of convective currents. Tuning the surface charges by adjusting buffer pH can modulate antigen capture efficiency. While the impact of pH has been studied on antibody–antigen binding in flow and non-flow systems, the use of sessile droplets and the specific impact of buffer pH on the capture efficiency of surface-functionalized antibodies remains understudied. Understanding how pH affects capture and deposition patterns is vital for optimizing immunosensor design. Additionally, the mechanisms governing internal flow within the droplet and dominant driving forces require further investigation. We investigated the effect of varying buffer pH on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) capture by anti-PSA functionalized polydimethylsiloxane substrates. Capture efficiency was measured using the Brown–Anson model applied to cyclic voltammetry, validated with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. pH significantly influenced PSA capture by surface-immobilized anti-PSA IgG. The extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek theory explained the interplay between pH and internal flow. Micro-particle image velocimetry (PIV) confirmed internal flow, primarily driven by Marangoni flow from solute concentration gradients. Controlling buffer pH in biosensors offers higher capture efficiency and desired deposition patterns. These insights advance immunosensor design and hold potential for biomedical and diagnostic applications.
期刊介绍:
Biomicrofluidics (BMF) is an online-only journal published by AIP Publishing to rapidly disseminate research in fundamental physicochemical mechanisms associated with microfluidic and nanofluidic phenomena. BMF also publishes research in unique microfluidic and nanofluidic techniques for diagnostic, medical, biological, pharmaceutical, environmental, and chemical applications.
BMF offers quick publication, multimedia capability, and worldwide circulation among academic, national, and industrial laboratories. With a primary focus on high-quality original research articles, BMF also organizes special sections that help explain and define specific challenges unique to the interdisciplinary field of biomicrofluidics.
Microfluidic and nanofluidic actuation (electrokinetics, acoustofluidics, optofluidics, capillary)
Liquid Biopsy (microRNA profiling, circulating tumor cell isolation, exosome isolation, circulating tumor DNA quantification)
Cell sorting, manipulation, and transfection (di/electrophoresis, magnetic beads, optical traps, electroporation)
Molecular Separation and Concentration (isotachophoresis, concentration polarization, di/electrophoresis, magnetic beads, nanoparticles)
Cell culture and analysis(single cell assays, stimuli response, stem cell transfection)
Genomic and proteomic analysis (rapid gene sequencing, DNA/protein/carbohydrate arrays)
Biosensors (immuno-assay, nucleic acid fluorescent assay, colorimetric assay, enzyme amplification, plasmonic and Raman nano-reporter, molecular beacon, FRET, aptamer, nanopore, optical fibers)
Biophysical transport and characterization (DNA, single protein, ion channel and membrane dynamics, cell motility and communication mechanisms, electrophysiology, patch clamping). Etc...