中小企业供应链在混乱时期的复原力:供应链稳健性、获得政府援助的机会和混乱强度的影响

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Process Management Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0073
Dilupa Nakandala, Jiahe Chen, Tendai Chikweche
{"title":"中小企业供应链在混乱时期的复原力:供应链稳健性、获得政府援助的机会和混乱强度的影响","authors":"Dilupa Nakandala, Jiahe Chen, Tendai Chikweche","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study investigates the antecedents of supply chain resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the effects of government assistance and disruption intensity in long-term disruptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study collected data from 626 SMEs in Australia in 2022 and analysed data using partial least squares structural equation modelling.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The study empirically confirms that digital capabilities, prior experience in disruptions, supplier proximity and relationships are antecedents of supply chain resilience of SMEs, with supply chain robustness as a mediator. It further confirms that SMEs' access to government assistance positively moderates the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness. The disruption intensity moderates the relationships between supplier proximity and supply chain robustness with supply chain resilience. Severe disruptions weaken the effects of prior disruption experiences and supplier relationships on supply chain resilience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings inform SME practitioners of the importance of building supply chain robustness, leveraging their prior experience, supplier proximity and relationships and capabilities and flexibility for dynamic supply chain structures when disruptions are intense.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The novelty of our study is the use of the Contingent Resource-Based View to understand the effects of firm and supply chain-level antecedents on supply chain robustness and resilience, considering the contextual contingencies of disruption intensity and government assistance. The focus on long-term disruptions extends the conventional supply chain resilience studies on supply and demand disruptions of small scale. We also explore the firm-level effects of government assistance, which extends the commonly tested economic-level effects. Furthermore, we investigate supply chain robustness and resilience as different but connected constructs, deviating from common approaches. The finding that the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness, not the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain resilience, becomes stronger with higher access to government support shows the importance of this approach to investigating specific effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity\",\"authors\":\"Dilupa Nakandala, Jiahe Chen, Tendai Chikweche\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study investigates the antecedents of supply chain resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the effects of government assistance and disruption intensity in long-term disruptions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This study collected data from 626 SMEs in Australia in 2022 and analysed data using partial least squares structural equation modelling.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The study empirically confirms that digital capabilities, prior experience in disruptions, supplier proximity and relationships are antecedents of supply chain resilience of SMEs, with supply chain robustness as a mediator. It further confirms that SMEs' access to government assistance positively moderates the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness. The disruption intensity moderates the relationships between supplier proximity and supply chain robustness with supply chain resilience. Severe disruptions weaken the effects of prior disruption experiences and supplier relationships on supply chain resilience.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings inform SME practitioners of the importance of building supply chain robustness, leveraging their prior experience, supplier proximity and relationships and capabilities and flexibility for dynamic supply chain structures when disruptions are intense.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The novelty of our study is the use of the Contingent Resource-Based View to understand the effects of firm and supply chain-level antecedents on supply chain robustness and resilience, considering the contextual contingencies of disruption intensity and government assistance. The focus on long-term disruptions extends the conventional supply chain resilience studies on supply and demand disruptions of small scale. We also explore the firm-level effects of government assistance, which extends the commonly tested economic-level effects. Furthermore, we investigate supply chain robustness and resilience as different but connected constructs, deviating from common approaches. The finding that the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness, not the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain resilience, becomes stronger with higher access to government support shows the importance of this approach to investigating specific effects.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-02-2024-0073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了中小型企业(SMEs)供应链复原力的前因,以及政府援助和中断强度在长期中断中的影响。研究结果本研究通过实证证实,数字能力、先前的中断经验、供应商接近度和关系是中小型企业供应链复原力的前因,而供应链稳健性则是中介。研究进一步证实,中小企业获得政府援助的机会对数字化能力和供应链稳健性之间的关系起到积极的调节作用。干扰强度调节了供应商接近度和供应链稳健性与供应链恢复力之间的关系。研究结果让中小企业从业者认识到,当中断强度较大时,建立供应链稳健性、利用其先前经验、供应商接近度和关系以及动态供应链结构的能力和灵活性非常重要。 原创性/价值我们的研究的新颖之处在于,考虑到中断强度和政府援助的背景突发事件,使用基于资源的权变观点来理解企业和供应链层面的先决条件对供应链稳健性和恢复力的影响。对长期中断的关注扩展了对小规模供需中断的传统供应链复原力研究。我们还探讨了政府援助在企业层面的影响,这扩展了通常测试的经济层面影响。此外,我们将供应链的稳健性和恢复力作为不同但相互关联的概念进行研究,这偏离了常见的研究方法。我们发现,数字能力与供应链稳健性之间的关系,而不是数字能力与供应链恢复力之间的关系,会随着获得政府支持的机会增加而变得更强,这表明这种方法对研究特定效应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity

Purpose

This study investigates the antecedents of supply chain resilience of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the effects of government assistance and disruption intensity in long-term disruptions.

Design/methodology/approach

This study collected data from 626 SMEs in Australia in 2022 and analysed data using partial least squares structural equation modelling.

Findings

The study empirically confirms that digital capabilities, prior experience in disruptions, supplier proximity and relationships are antecedents of supply chain resilience of SMEs, with supply chain robustness as a mediator. It further confirms that SMEs' access to government assistance positively moderates the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness. The disruption intensity moderates the relationships between supplier proximity and supply chain robustness with supply chain resilience. Severe disruptions weaken the effects of prior disruption experiences and supplier relationships on supply chain resilience.

Practical implications

The findings inform SME practitioners of the importance of building supply chain robustness, leveraging their prior experience, supplier proximity and relationships and capabilities and flexibility for dynamic supply chain structures when disruptions are intense.

Originality/value

The novelty of our study is the use of the Contingent Resource-Based View to understand the effects of firm and supply chain-level antecedents on supply chain robustness and resilience, considering the contextual contingencies of disruption intensity and government assistance. The focus on long-term disruptions extends the conventional supply chain resilience studies on supply and demand disruptions of small scale. We also explore the firm-level effects of government assistance, which extends the commonly tested economic-level effects. Furthermore, we investigate supply chain robustness and resilience as different but connected constructs, deviating from common approaches. The finding that the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain robustness, not the relationship between digital capabilities and supply chain resilience, becomes stronger with higher access to government support shows the importance of this approach to investigating specific effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
期刊最新文献
Research on the evaluation and enhancement strategies of manufacturing clustered supply chain synergies Big data analytics adoption success: value chain process-level perspective A holistic empirical approach to marketing activities and performance interaction in banking industry: the mediating role of customer-based brand equity Managing supply chain disruptions in pharmaceutical distribution: the roles of disruption orientation and mitigation strategies SME supply chain resilience in disruptive times: the effects of supply chain robustness, access to government assistance and disruption intensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1