用量子近似优化算法解决布尔可满足性问题

Sami Boulebnane, Ashley Montanaro
{"title":"用量子近似优化算法解决布尔可满足性问题","authors":"Sami Boulebnane, Ashley Montanaro","doi":"10.1103/prxquantum.5.030348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random <math display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mi>k</mi></math>-SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables <math display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mi>n</mi></math> goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small <math display=\"inline\" overflow=\"scroll\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mi>n</mi></math>, which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts.","PeriodicalId":501296,"journal":{"name":"PRX Quantum","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solving Boolean Satisfiability Problems With The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Sami Boulebnane, Ashley Montanaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/prxquantum.5.030348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random <math display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mi>k</mi></math>-SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables <math display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mi>n</mi></math> goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small <math display=\\\"inline\\\" overflow=\\\"scroll\\\" xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"><mi>n</mi></math>, which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRX Quantum\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRX Quantum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.5.030348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRX Quantum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/prxquantum.5.030348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

量子计算机最突出的应用领域之一是解决困难的约束满足和优化问题。然而,对标准量子算法复杂性的详细分析表明,要在这些问题上超越经典方法,需要极其庞大和强大的量子计算机。量子近似优化算法(QAOA)是专为近期量子计算机设计的,但之前的工作表明,QAOA 在优化问题上超越经典算法的能力受到很大限制。在这里,我们将 QAOA 应用于硬约束条件满足问题,预计经典算法和量子算法都需要指数级的时间。我们分析了 QAOA 在通常使用统计物理方法研究的约束条件满足问题上的平均成功概率:当变量数 n 变为无穷大时,随机 k-SAT 在可满足性阈值处的平均成功概率。我们对 QAOA 在小 n 条件下的性能进行了数值实验,结果与极限理论界限非常吻合,从而对这些理论结果进行了补充。然后,我们将 QAOA 与领先的经典求解器进行了比较。对于随机 8-SAT,我们发现对于超过 14 个量子电路层,QAOA 比我们测试过的最高性能经典求解器 WalkSATlm 实现了更高效的扩展。我们的研究结果表明,近期用于解决约束满足问题的量子算法可能会优于经典算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Solving Boolean Satisfiability Problems With The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
One of the most prominent application areas for quantum computers is solving hard constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. However, detailed analyses of the complexity of standard quantum algorithms have suggested that outperforming classical methods for these problems would require extremely large and powerful quantum computers. The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is designed for near-term quantum computers, yet previous work has shown strong limitations on the ability of QAOA to outperform classical algorithms for optimization problems. Here we instead apply QAOA to hard constraint satisfaction problems, where both classical and quantum algorithms are expected to require exponential time. We analytically characterize the average success probability of QAOA on a constraint satisfaction problem commonly studied using statistical physics methods: random k-SAT at the threshold for satisfiability, as the number of variables n goes to infinity. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on the performance of QAOA for small n, which match the limiting theoretical bounds closely. We then compare QAOA with leading classical solvers. For random 8-SAT, we find that for more than 14 quantum circuit layers, QAOA achieves more efficient scaling than the highest-performance classical solver we tested, WalkSATlm. Our results suggest that near-term quantum algorithms for solving constraint satisfaction problems may outperform their classical counterparts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing Leakage of Single-Qubit Gates for Superconducting Quantum Processors Using Analytical Control Pulse Envelopes Quasiprobabilities in Quantum Thermodynamics and Many-Body Systems Improving Threshold for Fault-Tolerant Color-Code Quantum Computing by Flagged Weight Optimization Progress in Superconductor-Semiconductor Topological Josephson Junctions Mitigating Scattering in a Quantum System Using Only an Integrating Sphere
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1