植被恢复期对土壤侵蚀性和山坡侵蚀过程的影响

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil & Tillage Research Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.still.2024.106305
{"title":"植被恢复期对土壤侵蚀性和山坡侵蚀过程的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Restoring vegetation is an effective way to control regional erosion as well as reduce soil erodibility. However, it is not clear how the vegetation restoration duration affects soil erodibility and how it further influences soil erosion processes. Therefore, the soil physicochemical properties and comprehensive soil erodibility index (<em>CSEI</em>) at five sampling sites with 3, 20, 55, 80 and 100 years of vegetation restoration were investigated in this study. A simulated rainfall with intensities of 60, 90, and 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup> was conducted on three slopes with gradients of 10°, 20°, and 30° by using rare earth element oxides (Ho<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) as tracers to quantify interrill and rill erosion. The results revealed a decreasing trend in both the <em>CSEI</em> and sediment concentration with increasing vegetation restoration duration. Compared to that at the site with 3 years of vegetation restoration, the <em>CSEI</em> at the sites with 20, 55, 80, and 100 years of restoration was reduced by 35.2 %, 39.7 %, 92.8 %, and 67.1 %, respectively. Interrill erosion dominated the hillslope erosion processes and contributed more than 76.9 % to the total erosion amount. By comparing the measured and estimated erosion rates using the equations provided by the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP), significant prediction errors were found. Therefore, relationships among the <em>CSEI</em>, slope gradient and rainfall intensity were established for interrill and rill erosion rate estimation in vegetation restoration areas. This study provides a theoretical basis for evaluating the soil and water conservation benefits of vegetation restoration and for improving soil erosion prediction models within the context of vegetation restoration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003064/pdfft?md5=995c59647b4a0a7dfdffb2a9e0c8e7b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724003064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil erodibility and hillslope erosion processes affected by vegetation restoration duration\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Restoring vegetation is an effective way to control regional erosion as well as reduce soil erodibility. However, it is not clear how the vegetation restoration duration affects soil erodibility and how it further influences soil erosion processes. Therefore, the soil physicochemical properties and comprehensive soil erodibility index (<em>CSEI</em>) at five sampling sites with 3, 20, 55, 80 and 100 years of vegetation restoration were investigated in this study. A simulated rainfall with intensities of 60, 90, and 120 mm h<sup>−1</sup> was conducted on three slopes with gradients of 10°, 20°, and 30° by using rare earth element oxides (Ho<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and Sm<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) as tracers to quantify interrill and rill erosion. The results revealed a decreasing trend in both the <em>CSEI</em> and sediment concentration with increasing vegetation restoration duration. Compared to that at the site with 3 years of vegetation restoration, the <em>CSEI</em> at the sites with 20, 55, 80, and 100 years of restoration was reduced by 35.2 %, 39.7 %, 92.8 %, and 67.1 %, respectively. Interrill erosion dominated the hillslope erosion processes and contributed more than 76.9 % to the total erosion amount. By comparing the measured and estimated erosion rates using the equations provided by the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP), significant prediction errors were found. Therefore, relationships among the <em>CSEI</em>, slope gradient and rainfall intensity were established for interrill and rill erosion rate estimation in vegetation restoration areas. This study provides a theoretical basis for evaluating the soil and water conservation benefits of vegetation restoration and for improving soil erosion prediction models within the context of vegetation restoration.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003064/pdfft?md5=995c59647b4a0a7dfdffb2a9e0c8e7b5&pid=1-s2.0-S0167198724003064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003064\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恢复植被是控制区域侵蚀和减少土壤侵蚀的有效方法。然而,植被恢复的持续时间如何影响土壤可侵蚀性以及如何进一步影响土壤侵蚀过程尚不清楚。因此,本研究调查了植被恢复 3 年、20 年、55 年、80 年和 100 年的五个采样点的土壤理化性质和土壤侵蚀综合指数(CSEI)。以稀土元素氧化物(Ho2O3 和 Sm2O3)为示踪剂,在坡度分别为 10°、20°和 30°的三个斜坡上进行了强度分别为 60、90 和 120 mm h-1 的模拟降雨,以量化沟间侵蚀和沟谷侵蚀。结果表明,随着植被恢复时间的延长,CSEI 和沉积物浓度均呈下降趋势。与植被恢复 3 年的地点相比,植被恢复 20 年、55 年、80 年和 100 年的地点的 CSEI 分别降低了 35.2%、39.7%、92.8% 和 67.1%。在山坡侵蚀过程中,山体间侵蚀占主导地位,占侵蚀总量的 76.9%以上。通过使用水侵蚀预测项目(WEPP)提供的公式对测量的侵蚀率和估算的侵蚀率进行比较,发现存在明显的预测误差。因此,建立了 CSEI、坡度和降雨强度之间的关系,用于植被恢复区域的沟间和沟谷侵蚀率估算。这项研究为评估植被恢复的水土保持效益和改进植被恢复背景下的土壤侵蚀预测模型提供了理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil erodibility and hillslope erosion processes affected by vegetation restoration duration

Restoring vegetation is an effective way to control regional erosion as well as reduce soil erodibility. However, it is not clear how the vegetation restoration duration affects soil erodibility and how it further influences soil erosion processes. Therefore, the soil physicochemical properties and comprehensive soil erodibility index (CSEI) at five sampling sites with 3, 20, 55, 80 and 100 years of vegetation restoration were investigated in this study. A simulated rainfall with intensities of 60, 90, and 120 mm h−1 was conducted on three slopes with gradients of 10°, 20°, and 30° by using rare earth element oxides (Ho2O3 and Sm2O3) as tracers to quantify interrill and rill erosion. The results revealed a decreasing trend in both the CSEI and sediment concentration with increasing vegetation restoration duration. Compared to that at the site with 3 years of vegetation restoration, the CSEI at the sites with 20, 55, 80, and 100 years of restoration was reduced by 35.2 %, 39.7 %, 92.8 %, and 67.1 %, respectively. Interrill erosion dominated the hillslope erosion processes and contributed more than 76.9 % to the total erosion amount. By comparing the measured and estimated erosion rates using the equations provided by the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP), significant prediction errors were found. Therefore, relationships among the CSEI, slope gradient and rainfall intensity were established for interrill and rill erosion rate estimation in vegetation restoration areas. This study provides a theoretical basis for evaluating the soil and water conservation benefits of vegetation restoration and for improving soil erosion prediction models within the context of vegetation restoration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
期刊最新文献
Modeling compaction effects on hydraulic properties of soils using limited information Soil surface roughness impacts erosion behavior through selective regulation of flow properties in rainfall-seepage scenarios Network analysis was effective in establishing the soil quality index and differentiated among changes in land-use type Changes in soil mechanical and hydraulic properties through regenerative cultivation measures in long-term and farm experiments in Germany Depth-driven responses of soil organic carbon fractions to orchard cover crops across China: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1