Che‐Yuan Wu, Baiju R. Shah, Abhinav Sharma, Yiru Sheng, Peter P. Liu, Alexander Kopp, Refik Saskin, Jodi D. Edwards, Walter Swardfager
{"title":"糖尿病急性心力衰竭患者开始使用钠-葡萄糖共转运体 2 抑制剂的时间与出院后的预后:基于人群的队列研究","authors":"Che‐Yuan Wu, Baiju R. Shah, Abhinav Sharma, Yiru Sheng, Peter P. Liu, Alexander Kopp, Refik Saskin, Jodi D. Edwards, Walter Swardfager","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsResults from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real‐world effectiveness of early versus delayed post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.Methods and resultsUsing linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population‐based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow‐up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4–90 days, or 91–180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The ‘clone‐censor‐weight’ approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time‐related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person‐years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post‐discharge was associated with a lower 1‐year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), while initiation 4–90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) or 91–180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.ConclusionReal‐world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor initiation and post‐discharge outcomes in acute heart failure with diabetes: A population‐based cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Che‐Yuan Wu, Baiju R. Shah, Abhinav Sharma, Yiru Sheng, Peter P. Liu, Alexander Kopp, Refik Saskin, Jodi D. Edwards, Walter Swardfager\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejhf.3464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimsResults from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real‐world effectiveness of early versus delayed post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.Methods and resultsUsing linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population‐based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow‐up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4–90 days, or 91–180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The ‘clone‐censor‐weight’ approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time‐related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person‐years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post‐discharge was associated with a lower 1‐year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), while initiation 4–90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) or 91–180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.ConclusionReal‐world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3464\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3464","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Timing of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor initiation and post‐discharge outcomes in acute heart failure with diabetes: A population‐based cohort study
AimsResults from randomized trials suggest benefit of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor initiation in clinically stable acute heart failure. We aim to examine the real‐world effectiveness of early versus delayed post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation in people with acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.Methods and resultsUsing linkable administrative databases in Ontario, Canada, individuals aged 66 years or older with type 2 diabetes who were discharged to the community from acute care hospitals for heart failure between 1 July 2016 and 31 March 2020 were included in this retrospective, population‐based cohort study. The primary outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) or cardiovascular mortality as a composite. Follow‐up started from discharge for maximum 1 year. We compared outcomes between post‐discharge SGLT2 inhibitor initiation within 3 days, 4–90 days, or 91–180 days, versus delayed initiation for at least 180 days. The ‘clone‐censor‐weight’ approach with a target trial emulation framework was used to address time‐related biases. There were 9641 eligible individuals. After cloning and artificial censoring, there were 38 564 clones, 12 439 person‐years, and 7584 events. Compared to delayed initiation for at least 180 days, initiation within 3 days post‐discharge was associated with a lower 1‐year risk of HHF or cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), while initiation 4–90 days (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72–0.93) or 91–180 days (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79–0.97) showed smaller risk reduction.ConclusionReal‐world evidence supports early SGLT2 inhibitor initiation to reduce HHF or cardiovascular mortality in acute heart failure and type 2 diabetes.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.