不同系统边界下三种橡胶屑改性沥青的生命周期比较评估

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Resources Conservation and Recycling Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107922
{"title":"不同系统边界下三种橡胶屑改性沥青的生命周期比较评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of three crumb rubber recycling technologies in asphalt rubber (AR) mixtures: wet, dry, and terminal blend. The analysis identifies key factors affecting their environmental performance across the life cycle. Results were characterized into climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, fine particulate matter, terrestrial acidification, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and Land use. Dynamic rankings of the three AR technologies along their life cycle stages in each impact category would enable identification of the influencing factors and provide reference for the further improvement. This study reveals that dry technology is likely to have the most significant environmental impacts across all categories (51.85 %-100 %), whereas terminal blended technology generally presents the lowest impact (51.85 %-88.89 %), with the exception of freshwater ecotoxicity (33.33 %) and human toxicity (22.22 %), where wet technology shows the least impact. The analysis underscores the importance of asphalt mixture designs, with appropriate binder content, potential reduction in surface course thickness, and reduced maintenance frequency, as strategies to enhance the environmental performance of AR technologies. The study concludes that the environmental performance of AR pavement is highly dependent on their in-service durability, with scenario-based analysis indicating that adequate durability ensures environmental effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative life cycle assessment of three types of crumb rubber modified asphalt under different system boundaries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of three crumb rubber recycling technologies in asphalt rubber (AR) mixtures: wet, dry, and terminal blend. The analysis identifies key factors affecting their environmental performance across the life cycle. Results were characterized into climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, fine particulate matter, terrestrial acidification, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and Land use. Dynamic rankings of the three AR technologies along their life cycle stages in each impact category would enable identification of the influencing factors and provide reference for the further improvement. This study reveals that dry technology is likely to have the most significant environmental impacts across all categories (51.85 %-100 %), whereas terminal blended technology generally presents the lowest impact (51.85 %-88.89 %), with the exception of freshwater ecotoxicity (33.33 %) and human toxicity (22.22 %), where wet technology shows the least impact. The analysis underscores the importance of asphalt mixture designs, with appropriate binder content, potential reduction in surface course thickness, and reduced maintenance frequency, as strategies to enhance the environmental performance of AR technologies. The study concludes that the environmental performance of AR pavement is highly dependent on their in-service durability, with scenario-based analysis indicating that adequate durability ensures environmental effectiveness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005159\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344924005159","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)方法,量化了沥青橡胶(AR)混合料(湿法、干法和终端混合料)中三种橡胶屑回收技术对环境的影响。分析确定了影响其整个生命周期环境表现的关键因素。分析结果分为气候变化、平流层臭氧损耗、细颗粒物、陆地酸化、海洋富营养化、淡水生态毒性、人类毒性和土地利用。对这三种 AR 技术在每个影响类别中的生命周期阶段进行动态排名,可以确定影响因素,并为进一步改进提供参考。这项研究表明,干法技术在所有类别中对环境的影响可能最大(51.85%-100%),而终端混合技术的影响一般最低(51.85%-88.89%),但淡水生态毒性(33.33%)和人类毒性(22.22%)除外,湿法技术的影响最小。该分析强调了沥青混合料设计的重要性,即采用适当的粘结剂含量、减少面层厚度和降低维护频率,以此作为提高 AR 技术环境性能的策略。研究得出结论,AR 路面的环保性能在很大程度上取决于其使用中的耐久性,基于情景的分析表明,足够的耐久性可确保环保效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative life cycle assessment of three types of crumb rubber modified asphalt under different system boundaries

This study employs a life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify the environmental impacts of three crumb rubber recycling technologies in asphalt rubber (AR) mixtures: wet, dry, and terminal blend. The analysis identifies key factors affecting their environmental performance across the life cycle. Results were characterized into climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, fine particulate matter, terrestrial acidification, marine eutrophication, freshwater ecotoxicity, human toxicity, and Land use. Dynamic rankings of the three AR technologies along their life cycle stages in each impact category would enable identification of the influencing factors and provide reference for the further improvement. This study reveals that dry technology is likely to have the most significant environmental impacts across all categories (51.85 %-100 %), whereas terminal blended technology generally presents the lowest impact (51.85 %-88.89 %), with the exception of freshwater ecotoxicity (33.33 %) and human toxicity (22.22 %), where wet technology shows the least impact. The analysis underscores the importance of asphalt mixture designs, with appropriate binder content, potential reduction in surface course thickness, and reduced maintenance frequency, as strategies to enhance the environmental performance of AR technologies. The study concludes that the environmental performance of AR pavement is highly dependent on their in-service durability, with scenario-based analysis indicating that adequate durability ensures environmental effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking sustainable lithium: A comparative life cycle assessment of innovative extraction methods from brine Packaging the future: Determinants of use intentions and incentive structures of reusable packaging systems Sustainable electroless nutrient recovery from natural agro-industrial and livestock farm wastewater effluents with a flow cell reactor Evaluation of sustainable waste management: An analysis of techno-economic and life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste sorting and decontamination Mining the atmosphere: A concrete solution to global warming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1