氮沉降条件下,氮吸收和利用效率下调导致碳固存减少

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110220
Song Wang , Ruiyang Zhang , Yuanyuan Huang , Yiqi Luo , Weinan Chen , Yahai Zhang , Jinsong Wang , Shuli Niu
{"title":"氮沉降条件下,氮吸收和利用效率下调导致碳固存减少","authors":"Song Wang ,&nbsp;Ruiyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Yiqi Luo ,&nbsp;Weinan Chen ,&nbsp;Yahai Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinsong Wang ,&nbsp;Shuli Niu","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Global nitrogen (N) deposition substantially enhances ecosystem carbon cycling but usually results in minor carbon sequestration. The mechanisms underlying the minor stimulation of N deposition on carbon sequestration are not fully understood. Here, we used 22 sets of observations from a gradient N addition experiment with rates at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, to 32 g N<strong>·</strong>m<sup>-2</sup><strong>·</strong>year<sup>-1</sup> in an alpine meadow ecosystem to constrain parameterization of the process-oriented Grassland ECOsystem (GECO) model. Our results indicate that the parameters related to plant N uptake and photosynthetic N use efficiency are proportionally downregulated with the rate of N addition. This is, the higher the rate of N addition, the larger the downward adjustment is in plant N uptake and use efficiency. GECO with parameter values not being adjusted to N treatments simulated higher annual GPP by 16.7 ± 7.1 %, 20.7 ± 6.7 %, 25.2 ± 8.2 %, 23.1 ± 7.0 %, and 49.5 ± 9.1 % under addition rates of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 g N<strong>·</strong>m<sup>-2</sup><strong>·</strong>year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, in comparison to these with parameter adjustment. Similarly, the ecosystem C storage simulated by GECO model without parameter adjustment was higher by 4.4 ± 2.5 % to 12.0 ± 3.0 % under these with parameter adjustment. Without adjustment of ecosystem physiological processes, such as the plant N uptake rate and use efficiency, Earth system models (ESMs) generally overestimate C uptake and storage under N deposition. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate these adjustments into ESMs to realistically predict global C dynamics under future N enrichment and its feedback to climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"358 ","pages":"Article 110220"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minor carbon sequestration under nitrogen deposition due to downregulated nitrogen uptake and use efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Song Wang ,&nbsp;Ruiyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Huang ,&nbsp;Yiqi Luo ,&nbsp;Weinan Chen ,&nbsp;Yahai Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinsong Wang ,&nbsp;Shuli Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Global nitrogen (N) deposition substantially enhances ecosystem carbon cycling but usually results in minor carbon sequestration. The mechanisms underlying the minor stimulation of N deposition on carbon sequestration are not fully understood. Here, we used 22 sets of observations from a gradient N addition experiment with rates at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, to 32 g N<strong>·</strong>m<sup>-2</sup><strong>·</strong>year<sup>-1</sup> in an alpine meadow ecosystem to constrain parameterization of the process-oriented Grassland ECOsystem (GECO) model. Our results indicate that the parameters related to plant N uptake and photosynthetic N use efficiency are proportionally downregulated with the rate of N addition. This is, the higher the rate of N addition, the larger the downward adjustment is in plant N uptake and use efficiency. GECO with parameter values not being adjusted to N treatments simulated higher annual GPP by 16.7 ± 7.1 %, 20.7 ± 6.7 %, 25.2 ± 8.2 %, 23.1 ± 7.0 %, and 49.5 ± 9.1 % under addition rates of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 g N<strong>·</strong>m<sup>-2</sup><strong>·</strong>year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively, in comparison to these with parameter adjustment. Similarly, the ecosystem C storage simulated by GECO model without parameter adjustment was higher by 4.4 ± 2.5 % to 12.0 ± 3.0 % under these with parameter adjustment. Without adjustment of ecosystem physiological processes, such as the plant N uptake rate and use efficiency, Earth system models (ESMs) generally overestimate C uptake and storage under N deposition. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate these adjustments into ESMs to realistically predict global C dynamics under future N enrichment and its feedback to climate change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"358 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003332\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003332","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球氮(N)沉积大大加强了生态系统的碳循环,但通常只产生少量固碳作用。氮沉降对固碳的微弱刺激机制尚未完全明了。在此,我们利用在高山草甸生态系统中进行的氮添加率为 0、2、4、8、16 至 32 g N-m-2-year-1 的梯度实验的 22 组观测数据,来限制面向过程的草地生态系统(GECO)模型的参数设置。我们的研究结果表明,与植物氮吸收和光合作用氮利用效率相关的参数随氮添加速率的增加而呈比例下调。也就是说,氮添加率越高,植物对氮的吸收和利用效率的下调幅度越大。在添加率为 2、4、8、16 和 32 g N-m-2-year-1 时,参数值未根据氮处理进行调整的 GECO 模拟的年 GPP 分别比参数调整后的高 16.7 ± 7.1 %、20.7 ± 6.7 %、25.2 ± 8.2 %、23.1 ± 7.0 % 和 49.5 ± 9.1 %。同样,GECO 模型模拟的生态系统碳储量在未进行参数调整的情况下,在进行参数调整的情况下分别增加了 4.4 ± 2.5 % 和 12.0 ± 3.0 %。如果不调整生态系统的生理过程,如植物对氮的吸收率和利用效率,地球系统模式(ESM)通常会高估氮沉积下的碳吸收和储存量。因此,必须将这些调整纳入 ESM,以真实地预测未来氮富集下的全球碳动态及其对气候变化的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minor carbon sequestration under nitrogen deposition due to downregulated nitrogen uptake and use efficiency

Global nitrogen (N) deposition substantially enhances ecosystem carbon cycling but usually results in minor carbon sequestration. The mechanisms underlying the minor stimulation of N deposition on carbon sequestration are not fully understood. Here, we used 22 sets of observations from a gradient N addition experiment with rates at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, to 32 g N·m-2·year-1 in an alpine meadow ecosystem to constrain parameterization of the process-oriented Grassland ECOsystem (GECO) model. Our results indicate that the parameters related to plant N uptake and photosynthetic N use efficiency are proportionally downregulated with the rate of N addition. This is, the higher the rate of N addition, the larger the downward adjustment is in plant N uptake and use efficiency. GECO with parameter values not being adjusted to N treatments simulated higher annual GPP by 16.7 ± 7.1 %, 20.7 ± 6.7 %, 25.2 ± 8.2 %, 23.1 ± 7.0 %, and 49.5 ± 9.1 % under addition rates of 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 g N·m-2·year-1, respectively, in comparison to these with parameter adjustment. Similarly, the ecosystem C storage simulated by GECO model without parameter adjustment was higher by 4.4 ± 2.5 % to 12.0 ± 3.0 % under these with parameter adjustment. Without adjustment of ecosystem physiological processes, such as the plant N uptake rate and use efficiency, Earth system models (ESMs) generally overestimate C uptake and storage under N deposition. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate these adjustments into ESMs to realistically predict global C dynamics under future N enrichment and its feedback to climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Forest fertilization transiently increases soil CO2 efflux in young Norway spruce stands in Sweden High-frequency attenuation in eddy covariance measurements from the LI-7200 IRGA with various heating and filter configurations – a spectral correction approach The joint assimilation of satellite observed LAI and soil moisture for the global root zone soil moisture production and its impact on land surface and ecosystem variables Editorial Board Drought dimensions impact birch resistance and resilience and their determining factors across semiarid forests of northern China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1