疼痛强度的变化与慢性非特异性腰背痛患者平衡控制能力的变化有关吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Journal of Sport and Health Science Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989
Daniel K Y Zheng,Jae Q J Liu,Jeremy R Chang,Jeffrey C Y Ng,Zhixing Zhou,Jinlong Wu,Chelsia K C Cheung,Frank F Huang,Sabina M Pinto,Dino Samartzis,Manuela L Ferreira,Kanchana Ekanayake,Stephen Lord,Xueqiang Wang,Arnold Y L Wong
{"title":"疼痛强度的变化与慢性非特异性腰背痛患者平衡控制能力的变化有关吗?系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Daniel K Y Zheng,Jae Q J Liu,Jeremy R Chang,Jeffrey C Y Ng,Zhixing Zhou,Jinlong Wu,Chelsia K C Cheung,Frank F Huang,Sabina M Pinto,Dino Samartzis,Manuela L Ferreira,Kanchana Ekanayake,Stephen Lord,Xueqiang Wang,Arnold Y L Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nThe aim of this study is to summarize the evidence regarding whether pain reduction in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) following conservative interventions is related to corresponding improvements in balance control.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nRandomized controlled trials were identified from 5 databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened and identified relevant studies that investigated the effects of nonsurgical or nonpharmacological CNSLBP treatments on both pain intensity and balance control. Meta-regression analyses were performed to establish the associations between post-treatment changes in these 2 variables.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\n31 studies involving 1280 participants with CNSLBP were included. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pain reduction was associated with and explained 34%-45% of decreases in body sway, as measured by center-of-pressure (CoP) area and CoP velocity with eyes open. However, no significant association was observed between pain reduction and CoP area or velocity in anteroposterior/mediolateral directions. Similarly, there was no significant association between pain reduction and CoP distance or radius. Low-quality evidence indicated that pain relief explained a 15% improvement in one-leg stance with eyes open but not in the eyes-closed condition. Additionally, very low-quality evidence suggested that pain relief explained a 44% decrease in the static anteroposterior stability index with eyes closed but not in the eyes-open, mediolateral, or overall conditions. Furthermore, low-quality evidence indicated that reduced pain was associated with and accounted for 25%-43% of the improved composite and posteromedial scores of the star-excursion balance test, rather than the anterior and posterolateral scores.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nDepending on the type of balance assessment, pain relief following conservative interventions may slightly to moderately enhance balance control in individuals with CNSLBP. Clinicians should pay close attention to the balance control in patients with CNSLBP, particularly among older adults.","PeriodicalId":48897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"100989"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are changes in pain intensity related to changes in balance control in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel K Y Zheng,Jae Q J Liu,Jeremy R Chang,Jeffrey C Y Ng,Zhixing Zhou,Jinlong Wu,Chelsia K C Cheung,Frank F Huang,Sabina M Pinto,Dino Samartzis,Manuela L Ferreira,Kanchana Ekanayake,Stephen Lord,Xueqiang Wang,Arnold Y L Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE\\r\\nThe aim of this study is to summarize the evidence regarding whether pain reduction in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) following conservative interventions is related to corresponding improvements in balance control.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nRandomized controlled trials were identified from 5 databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened and identified relevant studies that investigated the effects of nonsurgical or nonpharmacological CNSLBP treatments on both pain intensity and balance control. Meta-regression analyses were performed to establish the associations between post-treatment changes in these 2 variables.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\n31 studies involving 1280 participants with CNSLBP were included. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pain reduction was associated with and explained 34%-45% of decreases in body sway, as measured by center-of-pressure (CoP) area and CoP velocity with eyes open. However, no significant association was observed between pain reduction and CoP area or velocity in anteroposterior/mediolateral directions. Similarly, there was no significant association between pain reduction and CoP distance or radius. Low-quality evidence indicated that pain relief explained a 15% improvement in one-leg stance with eyes open but not in the eyes-closed condition. Additionally, very low-quality evidence suggested that pain relief explained a 44% decrease in the static anteroposterior stability index with eyes closed but not in the eyes-open, mediolateral, or overall conditions. Furthermore, low-quality evidence indicated that reduced pain was associated with and accounted for 25%-43% of the improved composite and posteromedial scores of the star-excursion balance test, rather than the anterior and posterolateral scores.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nDepending on the type of balance assessment, pain relief following conservative interventions may slightly to moderately enhance balance control in individuals with CNSLBP. Clinicians should pay close attention to the balance control in patients with CNSLBP, particularly among older adults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"100989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100989","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在总结有关慢性非特异性腰背痛(CNSLBP)患者在接受保守干预后疼痛减轻是否与平衡控制能力的相应改善有关的证据。方法从 5 个数据库(MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science 和 PsycINFO)中确定了随机对照试验。两名审稿人独立筛选并确定了相关研究,这些研究调查了非手术或非药物 CNSLBP 治疗对疼痛强度和平衡控制的影响。结果共纳入 31 项研究,涉及 1280 名 CNSLBP 患者。中等质量的证据表明,疼痛的减轻与身体摇摆的减少有关,并解释了身体摇摆减少的 34%-45% 的原因,身体摇摆是通过压力中心 (CoP) 面积和睁眼时的 CoP 速度测量的。然而,在疼痛减轻与前胸/中外侧方向的 CoP 面积或速度之间没有观察到明显的关联。同样,疼痛减轻与CoP距离或半径之间也无明显关联。低质量的证据表明,疼痛缓解可以解释睁眼时单腿站立15%的改善,而闭眼时则无法解释。此外,极低质量的证据表明,疼痛缓解可以解释闭眼状态下静态前后稳定性指数下降 44% 的原因,但在睁眼、内外侧或整体状态下则无法解释。此外,低质量证据表明,疼痛减轻与星形外展平衡测试的综合评分和后内侧评分的提高有关,占 25%-43% 的比例,而不是前侧和后外侧评分的提高。结论根据平衡评估的类型,保守干预后疼痛减轻可能会轻微至适度增强 CNSLBP 患者的平衡控制能力。临床医生应密切关注 CNSLBP 患者的平衡控制能力,尤其是老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are changes in pain intensity related to changes in balance control in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to summarize the evidence regarding whether pain reduction in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) following conservative interventions is related to corresponding improvements in balance control. METHODS Randomized controlled trials were identified from 5 databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Two reviewers independently screened and identified relevant studies that investigated the effects of nonsurgical or nonpharmacological CNSLBP treatments on both pain intensity and balance control. Meta-regression analyses were performed to establish the associations between post-treatment changes in these 2 variables. RESULTS 31 studies involving 1280 participants with CNSLBP were included. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pain reduction was associated with and explained 34%-45% of decreases in body sway, as measured by center-of-pressure (CoP) area and CoP velocity with eyes open. However, no significant association was observed between pain reduction and CoP area or velocity in anteroposterior/mediolateral directions. Similarly, there was no significant association between pain reduction and CoP distance or radius. Low-quality evidence indicated that pain relief explained a 15% improvement in one-leg stance with eyes open but not in the eyes-closed condition. Additionally, very low-quality evidence suggested that pain relief explained a 44% decrease in the static anteroposterior stability index with eyes closed but not in the eyes-open, mediolateral, or overall conditions. Furthermore, low-quality evidence indicated that reduced pain was associated with and accounted for 25%-43% of the improved composite and posteromedial scores of the star-excursion balance test, rather than the anterior and posterolateral scores. CONCLUSION Depending on the type of balance assessment, pain relief following conservative interventions may slightly to moderately enhance balance control in individuals with CNSLBP. Clinicians should pay close attention to the balance control in patients with CNSLBP, particularly among older adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
101
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport and Health Science (JSHS) is an international, multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance the fields of sport, exercise, physical activity, and health sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport, JSHS is dedicated to promoting original and impactful research, as well as topical reviews, editorials, opinions, and commentary papers. With a focus on physical and mental health, injury and disease prevention, traditional Chinese exercise, and human performance, JSHS offers a platform for scholars and researchers to share their findings and contribute to the advancement of these fields. Our journal is peer-reviewed, ensuring that all published works meet the highest academic standards. Supported by a carefully selected international editorial board, JSHS upholds impeccable integrity and provides an efficient publication platform. We invite submissions from scholars and researchers worldwide, and we are committed to disseminating insightful and influential research in the field of sport and health science.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Can changes in midsole bending stiffness of shoes affect the onset of joint work redistribution during a prolonged run?" [J Sport Health Sci 11 (2022) 293-302]. Does ischemic preconditioning enhance sports performance more than placebo or no intervention? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Iron deficiency, supplementation, and sports performance in female athletes: A systematic review. The Youth Fitness International Test (YFIT) battery for monitoring and surveillance among children and adolescents: A modified Delphi consensus project with 169 experts from 50 countries and territories. Comment on "Accelerometer-measured physical activity, sedentary behavior, and incidence of macrovascular and microvascular events in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetes".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1