关于经颅磁刺激疗法和经颅磁刺激疗法治疗精神分裂症患者幻听的疗效比较研究。

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Postgraduate Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1093/postmj/qgae119
Xiaofeng Gao,Yanfei Ni,Weiming Hu,Guomin Wang,Xianyan He
{"title":"关于经颅磁刺激疗法和经颅磁刺激疗法治疗精神分裂症患者幻听的疗效比较研究。","authors":"Xiaofeng Gao,Yanfei Ni,Weiming Hu,Guomin Wang,Xianyan He","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgae119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) treatment in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs).\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe enrolled 64 schizophrenia patients with AVHs who were treated with either rTMS (n = 32) or cTBS (n = 32), and we compared the clinical outcomes by evaluating parameters from motor evoked potentials, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS), and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), as well as the changes of serum neurotrophic factors before and after the treatment.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAfter the treatment, both treatments resulted in reduced PANSS scores, with the cTBS group showing more substantial symptom improvement across positive, negative, and general symptoms, highlighting the enhanced efficacy of cTBS. Cognitive functions assessed by MCCB also improved in both groups, with cTBS showing a generally higher therapeutic effect. Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) increased following treatment in both groups, with a more notable increase after cTBS, while GABA and glutamate levels remained unchanged. Cardiovascular indices were unaffected by either treatment, suggesting no significant impact on cardiovascular health.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur study found that both rTMS and cTBS treatment can exhibit therapeutic effects in the management of AVHs in patients with schizophrenia. However, cTBS treatment generally shows a higher therapeutic effect than rTMS treatment.","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study about the therapeutic effect of cTBS and rTMS in the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Gao,Yanfei Ni,Weiming Hu,Guomin Wang,Xianyan He\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgae119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) treatment in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs).\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe enrolled 64 schizophrenia patients with AVHs who were treated with either rTMS (n = 32) or cTBS (n = 32), and we compared the clinical outcomes by evaluating parameters from motor evoked potentials, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS), and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), as well as the changes of serum neurotrophic factors before and after the treatment.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nAfter the treatment, both treatments resulted in reduced PANSS scores, with the cTBS group showing more substantial symptom improvement across positive, negative, and general symptoms, highlighting the enhanced efficacy of cTBS. Cognitive functions assessed by MCCB also improved in both groups, with cTBS showing a generally higher therapeutic effect. Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) increased following treatment in both groups, with a more notable increase after cTBS, while GABA and glutamate levels remained unchanged. Cardiovascular indices were unaffected by either treatment, suggesting no significant impact on cardiovascular health.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nOur study found that both rTMS and cTBS treatment can exhibit therapeutic effects in the management of AVHs in patients with schizophrenia. However, cTBS treatment generally shows a higher therapeutic effect than rTMS treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgae119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和连续θ-脉冲刺激(cTBS)对患有听觉言语幻觉(AVHs)的精神分裂症患者的治疗效果。通过评估运动诱发电位、阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)、听幻觉评定量表(AHRS)、MATRICS共识认知测验(MCCB)的参数以及治疗前后血清神经营养因子的变化,比较临床疗效。结果治疗后,两种治疗方法的PANSS评分均有所下降,而cTBS组在阳性、阴性和一般症状方面的症状改善更为显著,凸显了cTBS的疗效。两组患者通过 MCCB 评估的认知功能也都有所改善,而 cTBS 的疗效普遍更高。两组患者治疗后血清中脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和胶质细胞系源性神经营养因子(GDNF)的水平均有所提高,其中 cTBS 的提高更为显著,而 GABA 和谷氨酸的水平则保持不变。我们的研究发现,经颅磁刺激和 cTBS 治疗对精神分裂症患者的 AVHs 均有疗效。然而,经颅磁刺激治疗的疗效通常高于经颅磁刺激治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study about the therapeutic effect of cTBS and rTMS in the treatment of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare the therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) treatment in schizophrenia patients with auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs). METHODS We enrolled 64 schizophrenia patients with AVHs who were treated with either rTMS (n = 32) or cTBS (n = 32), and we compared the clinical outcomes by evaluating parameters from motor evoked potentials, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS), and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), as well as the changes of serum neurotrophic factors before and after the treatment. RESULTS After the treatment, both treatments resulted in reduced PANSS scores, with the cTBS group showing more substantial symptom improvement across positive, negative, and general symptoms, highlighting the enhanced efficacy of cTBS. Cognitive functions assessed by MCCB also improved in both groups, with cTBS showing a generally higher therapeutic effect. Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) increased following treatment in both groups, with a more notable increase after cTBS, while GABA and glutamate levels remained unchanged. Cardiovascular indices were unaffected by either treatment, suggesting no significant impact on cardiovascular health. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that both rTMS and cTBS treatment can exhibit therapeutic effects in the management of AVHs in patients with schizophrenia. However, cTBS treatment generally shows a higher therapeutic effect than rTMS treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
期刊最新文献
Policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training among residents of various subspecialties. Bridging the gap: advancing gender equality in medical research. Evaluating safety and efficacy of plastic versus metal stenting in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Screening doctors in training for dyslexia: the benefits of an inclusive screening approach. Improving senior medical workforce retention at a large teaching hospital trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1