无监督配准揭示了不同个体和脑区在自然场景神经表征结构上的共性和差异

Ken Takeda, Kota Abe, Jun Kitazono, Masafumi Oizumi
{"title":"无监督配准揭示了不同个体和脑区在自然场景神经表征结构上的共性和差异","authors":"Ken Takeda, Kota Abe, Jun Kitazono, Masafumi Oizumi","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.18.613792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neuroscience research has extensively explored the commonality of neural representations of sensory stimuli across individuals to uncover universal neural mechanisms in the encoding of sensory information. To compare neural representations across different brains, Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) has been used, which focuses on the similarity structures of neural representations for different stimuli. Despite the broad applicability and utility of RSA, one limitation is that its conventional framework assumes that neural representations of particular stimuli correspond directly to those of the same stimuli in different brains. This assumption excludes the possibility that neural representations correspond differently and limits the exploration of finer structural similarities. To overcome this limitation, we propose to use an unsupervised alignment framework based on Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (GWOT) to compare similarity structures without presupposing stimulus correspondences. This method allows for the identification of optimal correspondence between neural representations of stimuli based solely on internal neural representation relationships, and thereby provides a more detailed comparison of neural similarity structures across individuals. We applied this unsupervised alignment to investigate the commonality of representational similarity structures of natural scenes, using large datasets of Neuropixels recordings in mice and fMRI recordings in humans. We found that the similarity structure of neural representations in the same visual cortical areas can be well aligned across individuals in an unsupervised manner in both mice and humans. In contrast, we found that the degree of alignment across different brain areas cannot be fully explained by proximity in the visual processing hierarchy alone, but also found some reasonable alignment results, such that the similarity structures of higher-order visual areas can be well aligned with each other but not with lower-order visual areas. We expect that our unsupervised approach will be useful for revealing more detailed structural commonalities or differences that may not be captured by the conventional supervised approach.","PeriodicalId":501581,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unsupervised alignment reveals structural commonalities and differences in neural representations of natural scenes across individuals and brain areas\",\"authors\":\"Ken Takeda, Kota Abe, Jun Kitazono, Masafumi Oizumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.18.613792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neuroscience research has extensively explored the commonality of neural representations of sensory stimuli across individuals to uncover universal neural mechanisms in the encoding of sensory information. To compare neural representations across different brains, Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) has been used, which focuses on the similarity structures of neural representations for different stimuli. Despite the broad applicability and utility of RSA, one limitation is that its conventional framework assumes that neural representations of particular stimuli correspond directly to those of the same stimuli in different brains. This assumption excludes the possibility that neural representations correspond differently and limits the exploration of finer structural similarities. To overcome this limitation, we propose to use an unsupervised alignment framework based on Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (GWOT) to compare similarity structures without presupposing stimulus correspondences. This method allows for the identification of optimal correspondence between neural representations of stimuli based solely on internal neural representation relationships, and thereby provides a more detailed comparison of neural similarity structures across individuals. We applied this unsupervised alignment to investigate the commonality of representational similarity structures of natural scenes, using large datasets of Neuropixels recordings in mice and fMRI recordings in humans. We found that the similarity structure of neural representations in the same visual cortical areas can be well aligned across individuals in an unsupervised manner in both mice and humans. In contrast, we found that the degree of alignment across different brain areas cannot be fully explained by proximity in the visual processing hierarchy alone, but also found some reasonable alignment results, such that the similarity structures of higher-order visual areas can be well aligned with each other but not with lower-order visual areas. We expect that our unsupervised approach will be useful for revealing more detailed structural commonalities or differences that may not be captured by the conventional supervised approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv - Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv - Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.18.613792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.18.613792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经科学研究广泛探讨了不同个体感官刺激神经表征的共性,以揭示感官信息编码的普遍神经机制。为了比较不同大脑的神经表征,人们采用了表征相似性分析法(RSA),其重点是不同刺激的神经表征的相似性结构。尽管 RSA 具有广泛的适用性和实用性,但其局限性在于其传统框架假定特定刺激的神经表征与不同大脑中相同刺激的神经表征直接对应。这一假设排除了神经表征以不同方式对应的可能性,并限制了对更精细结构相似性的探索。为了克服这一局限性,我们建议使用基于格罗莫夫-瓦瑟斯坦最优传输(GWOT)的无监督配准框架,在不预设刺激对应关系的情况下比较相似性结构。这种方法可以仅根据内部神经表征关系识别刺激物神经表征之间的最佳对应关系,从而对不同个体的神经相似性结构进行更详细的比较。我们利用小鼠神经像素记录和人类 fMRI 记录的大型数据集,将这种无监督配准方法用于研究自然场景表征相似性结构的共性。我们发现,无论是小鼠还是人类,同一视觉皮层区域的神经表征相似性结构都能以无监督的方式在不同个体间进行很好的排列。与此相反,我们发现不同脑区之间的一致性程度不能仅由视觉处理层次结构中的邻近性来完全解释,但也发现了一些合理的一致性结果,例如高阶视觉区域的相似性结构可以很好地相互一致,但低阶视觉区域的相似性结构却不能。我们预计,我们的无监督方法将有助于揭示传统监督方法可能无法捕捉到的更详细的结构共性或差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unsupervised alignment reveals structural commonalities and differences in neural representations of natural scenes across individuals and brain areas
Neuroscience research has extensively explored the commonality of neural representations of sensory stimuli across individuals to uncover universal neural mechanisms in the encoding of sensory information. To compare neural representations across different brains, Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA) has been used, which focuses on the similarity structures of neural representations for different stimuli. Despite the broad applicability and utility of RSA, one limitation is that its conventional framework assumes that neural representations of particular stimuli correspond directly to those of the same stimuli in different brains. This assumption excludes the possibility that neural representations correspond differently and limits the exploration of finer structural similarities. To overcome this limitation, we propose to use an unsupervised alignment framework based on Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (GWOT) to compare similarity structures without presupposing stimulus correspondences. This method allows for the identification of optimal correspondence between neural representations of stimuli based solely on internal neural representation relationships, and thereby provides a more detailed comparison of neural similarity structures across individuals. We applied this unsupervised alignment to investigate the commonality of representational similarity structures of natural scenes, using large datasets of Neuropixels recordings in mice and fMRI recordings in humans. We found that the similarity structure of neural representations in the same visual cortical areas can be well aligned across individuals in an unsupervised manner in both mice and humans. In contrast, we found that the degree of alignment across different brain areas cannot be fully explained by proximity in the visual processing hierarchy alone, but also found some reasonable alignment results, such that the similarity structures of higher-order visual areas can be well aligned with each other but not with lower-order visual areas. We expect that our unsupervised approach will be useful for revealing more detailed structural commonalities or differences that may not be captured by the conventional supervised approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FUS controls muscle differentiation and structure through LLPS mediated recruitment of MEF2 and ETV5 Neural basis of collective social behavior during environmental challenge Contrasting Cognitive, Behavioral, and Physiological Responses to Breathwork vs. Naturalistic Stimuli in Reflective Chamber and VR Headset Environments Alpha-synuclein preformed fibril-induced aggregation and dopaminergic cell death in cathepsin D overexpression and ZKSCAN3 knockout mice Histamine interferes with the early visual processing in mice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1