门静脉解剖结构会影响结直肠癌转移灶的肝内分布吗?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiology and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.2478/raon-2024-0039
Anaïs Tribolet,Maxime Barat,David Fuks,Mathilde Aissaoui,Philippe Soyer,Ugo Marchese,Martin Gaillard,Alexandra Nassar,Jean Hardwigsen,Stylianos Tzedakis
{"title":"门静脉解剖结构会影响结直肠癌转移灶的肝内分布吗?","authors":"Anaïs Tribolet,Maxime Barat,David Fuks,Mathilde Aissaoui,Philippe Soyer,Ugo Marchese,Martin Gaillard,Alexandra Nassar,Jean Hardwigsen,Stylianos Tzedakis","doi":"10.2478/raon-2024-0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nOther than location of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC), a few factors are known to influence the intrahepatic distribution of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We aimed to assess whether the anatomy of the portal vein (PV) could influence the intrahepatic distribution of CRLM.\r\n\r\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\r\nPatients with CRLM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022 at two tertiary centers were included and imaging was reviewed by two radiologists independently. Intra-operator concordance was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The influence of the diameter, angulation of the PV branches and their variations on the number and distribution of CRLM were compared using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-square and Spearman's correlation tests.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwo hundred patients were included. ICC was high (> 0.90, P < 0.001). Intrahepatic CRLM distribution was right-liver, left-liver unilateral and bilateral in 66 (33%), 24 (12%) and 110 patients (55%), respectively. Median number of CRLM was 3 (1-7). Type 1, 2 and 3 portal vein variations were observed in 156 (78%), 19 (9.5%) and 25 (12%) patients, respectively. CRLM unilateral or bilateral distribution was not influenced by PV anatomical variations (P = 0.13), diameter of the right (P = 0.90) or left (P = 0.50) PV branches, angulation of the right (P = 0.20) or left (P = 0.80) PV branches and was independent from primary tumor localisation (P = 0.60). No correlations were found between CRLM number and diameter (R: 0.093, P = 0.10) or angulation of the PV branches (R: 0.012, P = 0.83).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPV anatomy does not seem to influence the distribution and number of CRLM.","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":"8 1","pages":"376-385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does portal vein anatomy influence intrahepatic distribution of metastases from colorectal cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Anaïs Tribolet,Maxime Barat,David Fuks,Mathilde Aissaoui,Philippe Soyer,Ugo Marchese,Martin Gaillard,Alexandra Nassar,Jean Hardwigsen,Stylianos Tzedakis\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/raon-2024-0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nOther than location of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC), a few factors are known to influence the intrahepatic distribution of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We aimed to assess whether the anatomy of the portal vein (PV) could influence the intrahepatic distribution of CRLM.\\r\\n\\r\\nPATIENTS AND METHODS\\r\\nPatients with CRLM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022 at two tertiary centers were included and imaging was reviewed by two radiologists independently. Intra-operator concordance was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The influence of the diameter, angulation of the PV branches and their variations on the number and distribution of CRLM were compared using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-square and Spearman's correlation tests.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwo hundred patients were included. ICC was high (> 0.90, P < 0.001). Intrahepatic CRLM distribution was right-liver, left-liver unilateral and bilateral in 66 (33%), 24 (12%) and 110 patients (55%), respectively. Median number of CRLM was 3 (1-7). Type 1, 2 and 3 portal vein variations were observed in 156 (78%), 19 (9.5%) and 25 (12%) patients, respectively. CRLM unilateral or bilateral distribution was not influenced by PV anatomical variations (P = 0.13), diameter of the right (P = 0.90) or left (P = 0.50) PV branches, angulation of the right (P = 0.20) or left (P = 0.80) PV branches and was independent from primary tumor localisation (P = 0.60). No correlations were found between CRLM number and diameter (R: 0.093, P = 0.10) or angulation of the PV branches (R: 0.012, P = 0.83).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nPV anatomy does not seem to influence the distribution and number of CRLM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"376-385\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景除了原发性结直肠癌(CRC)的位置外,已知还有一些因素会影响结直肠癌肝转移瘤(CRLM)的肝内分布。我们旨在评估门静脉(PV)的解剖结构是否会影响CRLM的肝内分布。患者和方法纳入2018年1月至2022年12月期间在两个三级中心确诊的CRLM患者,由两名放射科医生独立进行影像学审查。根据类内相关系数(ICC)评估操作者内部的一致性。使用 Mann-Whitney、Kruskal-Wallis、Pearson 的 Chi-square 和 Spearman 的相关性检验比较了 PV 分支的直径、角度及其变化对 CRLM 数量和分布的影响。ICC较高(> 0.90,P < 0.001)。66例(33%)、24例(12%)和110例(55%)患者的肝内CRLM分布为右肝、左肝单侧和双侧。CRLM 的中位数为 3(1-7)。观察到 1、2 和 3 型门静脉变异的患者分别有 156 人(78%)、19 人(9.5%)和 25 人(12%)。CRLM 单侧或双侧分布不受门静脉解剖变异(P = 0.13)、右侧(P = 0.90)或左侧(P = 0.50)门静脉分支直径、右侧(P = 0.20)或左侧(P = 0.80)门静脉分支成角的影响,也与原发肿瘤定位无关(P = 0.60)。未发现 CRLM 数量与 PV 分支直径(R:0.093,P = 0.10)或角度(R:0.012,P = 0.83)之间存在相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does portal vein anatomy influence intrahepatic distribution of metastases from colorectal cancer?
BACKGROUND Other than location of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC), a few factors are known to influence the intrahepatic distribution of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). We aimed to assess whether the anatomy of the portal vein (PV) could influence the intrahepatic distribution of CRLM. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with CRLM diagnosed between January 2018 and December 2022 at two tertiary centers were included and imaging was reviewed by two radiologists independently. Intra-operator concordance was assessed according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The influence of the diameter, angulation of the PV branches and their variations on the number and distribution of CRLM were compared using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's Chi-square and Spearman's correlation tests. RESULTS Two hundred patients were included. ICC was high (> 0.90, P < 0.001). Intrahepatic CRLM distribution was right-liver, left-liver unilateral and bilateral in 66 (33%), 24 (12%) and 110 patients (55%), respectively. Median number of CRLM was 3 (1-7). Type 1, 2 and 3 portal vein variations were observed in 156 (78%), 19 (9.5%) and 25 (12%) patients, respectively. CRLM unilateral or bilateral distribution was not influenced by PV anatomical variations (P = 0.13), diameter of the right (P = 0.90) or left (P = 0.50) PV branches, angulation of the right (P = 0.20) or left (P = 0.80) PV branches and was independent from primary tumor localisation (P = 0.60). No correlations were found between CRLM number and diameter (R: 0.093, P = 0.10) or angulation of the PV branches (R: 0.012, P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS PV anatomy does not seem to influence the distribution and number of CRLM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of early diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer in Slovenia. Assessment of chemical-shift and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant and benign vertebral lesions in oncologic patients. A single institution experience. Characteristics of exposure to radioactive iodine during a nuclear incident. Inter-observer variation in gross tumour volume delineation of oesophageal cancer on MR, CT and PET/CT. Posterior interosseous nerve lesion due to lipoma. Review of the literature and rare case presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1