小儿霰粒肿的保守治疗。

Seung Ahn Yang,Christopher B Chambers,Min Seung Kang,Jung Hyo Ahn
{"title":"小儿霰粒肿的保守治疗。","authors":"Seung Ahn Yang,Christopher B Chambers,Min Seung Kang,Jung Hyo Ahn","doi":"10.1097/scs.0000000000010644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed 101 chalazions in 91 children aged younger than 15 years at the authors' clinic. Patients were divided into 3 groups by their ages at the time of conservative or surgical treatment: 30 patients aged 2 and under (group A), 38 patients aged 3 to 6 (group B), and 23 patients aged 7 to 15 (group C). Initially, conservative treatment was administered, then incision and curettage were performed if it proved ineffective. Data included sex, age, number of lesions, position of lesions, size of lesions, time to resolution after treatment, and presence of complications for each group; comparative analysis was conducted. The success rate of conservative treatment was 85.7% (78/91): 96.7% (29/30) in group A, 86.8% (33/38) in group B, and 69.7% (16/23) in group C (P = 0.022). The mean age of the patients and the mean lesion size showed a significant difference between the conservative group and the surgery group (P = 0.047 and 0.009, respectively). Conservative treatment of chalazion is an effective first-line treatment option for uncomplicated and small chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors should consider starting patients on a trial of conservative therapy versus invasive therapy based on the size of the lesion, the duration of conservative treatment, and age.","PeriodicalId":501649,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative Treatment of Chalazion in Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Ahn Yang,Christopher B Chambers,Min Seung Kang,Jung Hyo Ahn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/scs.0000000000010644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed 101 chalazions in 91 children aged younger than 15 years at the authors' clinic. Patients were divided into 3 groups by their ages at the time of conservative or surgical treatment: 30 patients aged 2 and under (group A), 38 patients aged 3 to 6 (group B), and 23 patients aged 7 to 15 (group C). Initially, conservative treatment was administered, then incision and curettage were performed if it proved ineffective. Data included sex, age, number of lesions, position of lesions, size of lesions, time to resolution after treatment, and presence of complications for each group; comparative analysis was conducted. The success rate of conservative treatment was 85.7% (78/91): 96.7% (29/30) in group A, 86.8% (33/38) in group B, and 69.7% (16/23) in group C (P = 0.022). The mean age of the patients and the mean lesion size showed a significant difference between the conservative group and the surgery group (P = 0.047 and 0.009, respectively). Conservative treatment of chalazion is an effective first-line treatment option for uncomplicated and small chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors should consider starting patients on a trial of conservative therapy versus invasive therapy based on the size of the lesion, the duration of conservative treatment, and age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估儿科霰粒肿保守治疗的有效性。作者回顾性研究了作者诊所中 91 名 15 岁以下儿童的 101 例霰粒肿。根据患者接受保守或手术治疗时的年龄将其分为三组:2岁及以下的患者有30人(A组),3至6岁的患者有38人(B组),7至15岁的患者有23人(C组)。最初采用保守治疗,如果效果不佳,则进行切开和刮除术。数据包括各组患者的性别、年龄、病灶数量、病灶位置、病灶大小、治疗后消退时间以及是否出现并发症;并进行了比较分析。保守治疗的成功率为 85.7%(78/91):A组为96.7%(29/30),B组为86.8%(33/38),C组为69.7%(16/23)(P=0.022)。保守治疗组和手术治疗组患者的平均年龄和平均病灶大小有显著差异(P = 0.047 和 0.009)。对于无并发症的小儿霰粒肿,保守治疗是有效的一线治疗方案。作者应根据病变的大小、保守治疗的持续时间和年龄,考虑让患者开始接受保守治疗与侵入性治疗的对比试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservative Treatment of Chalazion in Pediatric Patients.
This study aims to assess the effectiveness of conservative treatment for chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors retrospectively reviewed 101 chalazions in 91 children aged younger than 15 years at the authors' clinic. Patients were divided into 3 groups by their ages at the time of conservative or surgical treatment: 30 patients aged 2 and under (group A), 38 patients aged 3 to 6 (group B), and 23 patients aged 7 to 15 (group C). Initially, conservative treatment was administered, then incision and curettage were performed if it proved ineffective. Data included sex, age, number of lesions, position of lesions, size of lesions, time to resolution after treatment, and presence of complications for each group; comparative analysis was conducted. The success rate of conservative treatment was 85.7% (78/91): 96.7% (29/30) in group A, 86.8% (33/38) in group B, and 69.7% (16/23) in group C (P = 0.022). The mean age of the patients and the mean lesion size showed a significant difference between the conservative group and the surgery group (P = 0.047 and 0.009, respectively). Conservative treatment of chalazion is an effective first-line treatment option for uncomplicated and small chalazion in pediatric patients. The authors should consider starting patients on a trial of conservative therapy versus invasive therapy based on the size of the lesion, the duration of conservative treatment, and age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Correlation Between Types of Orbital Fractures and Ocular Symptoms, and the Effect of Manual Preformed and Patient-Specific Mesh Implants: A Retrospective Study. Qualitative Research on the Causes of Kinesiophobia in Postoperative Cerebellar Tumor Patients. Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Prevention and Treatment of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Big Data Analysis of Facial Fracture Epidemiology in South Korea From 2015 to 2020: Impacts of Aging and Personal Mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1