改变树脂基水门汀的配制方法对其物理和粘接质量的影响。

Alaa Aljohani,Rafiullah Bashiri,Adalberto B Vasconcellos,Abdulhaq A Suliman,Taiseer A Sulaiman
{"title":"改变树脂基水门汀的配制方法对其物理和粘接质量的影响。","authors":"Alaa Aljohani,Rafiullah Bashiri,Adalberto B Vasconcellos,Abdulhaq A Suliman,Taiseer A Sulaiman","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\r\nDespite the advances in dental cements a significant gap remains in understanding how different dispensing and mixing techniques impact the physical properties of resin-based cements.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate how the physical properties, shear bond strengths (before and after thermocycling), and film thickness of resin-based cements change based on the dispensing and mixing methods.\r\n\r\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\r\nEight different resin-based cements were evaluated, and specimens were prepared for each method (n=14) by following International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards. The specimens were desiccated and immersed according to the ISO standard, and measurements were made to determine water sorption, solubility, mass change, and film thickness. Finally, specimens were thermocycled (5-55˚C for 20 000 cycles), and shear bond strength was evaluated. Statistical analysis was then performed with the 1- and 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFor Variolink Esthetic (automix, 30.03 µg/mm3), the Wsp was 74.8% greater than Variolink II (hand mix, 17.18 µg/mm3) and 682.3% more soluble (P<.05). The least soluble resin-based cements were RelyX Unicem (3.83 µg/mm3), RelyX Unicem 2 (2.22 µg/mm3), and Variolink II (2.43 µg/mm3). PANAVIA SA automix and G-CEM LinkAce automix had twice the film thickness as their hand mixed counterparts (P<.05). Thermocycling reduced the shear bond strength for most resin-based cements. RelyX Unicem (3.94 MPa), Variolink II (8.52 MPa), and G-CEM Capsule (5.02 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strength compared with their automix counterparts (P<.05).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe dispensing methods were found to significantly impact the properties of resin-based cements. Variolink II demonstrated the lowest water sorption and highest shear bond strength among the cements tested. RelyX in both mixing methods exhibited a low solubility rate. Additionally, RelyX showed consistent thickness, regardless of the different dispensing methods.","PeriodicalId":501672,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of altering the dispensing methods of resin-based cements on their physical and bonding qualities.\",\"authors\":\"Alaa Aljohani,Rafiullah Bashiri,Adalberto B Vasconcellos,Abdulhaq A Suliman,Taiseer A Sulaiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM\\r\\nDespite the advances in dental cements a significant gap remains in understanding how different dispensing and mixing techniques impact the physical properties of resin-based cements.\\r\\n\\r\\nPURPOSE\\r\\nThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate how the physical properties, shear bond strengths (before and after thermocycling), and film thickness of resin-based cements change based on the dispensing and mixing methods.\\r\\n\\r\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\r\\nEight different resin-based cements were evaluated, and specimens were prepared for each method (n=14) by following International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards. The specimens were desiccated and immersed according to the ISO standard, and measurements were made to determine water sorption, solubility, mass change, and film thickness. Finally, specimens were thermocycled (5-55˚C for 20 000 cycles), and shear bond strength was evaluated. Statistical analysis was then performed with the 1- and 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nFor Variolink Esthetic (automix, 30.03 µg/mm3), the Wsp was 74.8% greater than Variolink II (hand mix, 17.18 µg/mm3) and 682.3% more soluble (P<.05). The least soluble resin-based cements were RelyX Unicem (3.83 µg/mm3), RelyX Unicem 2 (2.22 µg/mm3), and Variolink II (2.43 µg/mm3). PANAVIA SA automix and G-CEM LinkAce automix had twice the film thickness as their hand mixed counterparts (P<.05). Thermocycling reduced the shear bond strength for most resin-based cements. RelyX Unicem (3.94 MPa), Variolink II (8.52 MPa), and G-CEM Capsule (5.02 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strength compared with their automix counterparts (P<.05).\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nThe dispensing methods were found to significantly impact the properties of resin-based cements. Variolink II demonstrated the lowest water sorption and highest shear bond strength among the cements tested. RelyX in both mixing methods exhibited a low solubility rate. Additionally, RelyX showed consistent thickness, regardless of the different dispensing methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述尽管牙科水门汀技术在不断进步,但在了解不同的分配和混合技术如何影响树脂基水门汀的物理性质方面仍存在很大差距。本体外研究的目的是调查树脂基水门汀的物理性质、剪切粘接强度(热循环前后)和薄膜厚度如何随配点和混合方法的不同而变化。材料和方法评估了八种不同的树脂基水门汀,并按照国际标准化组织 (ISO) 的标准为每种方法制备了试样(n=14)。根据 ISO 标准对试样进行干燥和浸泡,并测量其吸水性、溶解性、质量变化和薄膜厚度。最后,对试样进行热循环(5-55˚C,20,000 个循环),并评估剪切粘接强度。结果对于 Variolink Esthetic(自动混合,30.03 µg/mm3),Wsp 比 Variolink II(手工混合,17.18 µg/mm3)高 74.8%,溶解度高 682.3%(P<.05)。溶解度最低的树脂基水泥是 RelyX Unicem(3.83 微克/立方毫米)、RelyX Unicem 2(2.22 微克/立方毫米)和 Variolink II(2.43 微克/立方毫米)。PANAVIA SA 自动混合物和 G-CEM LinkAce 自动混合物的薄膜厚度是手工混合物的两倍(P<.05)。热循环降低了大多数树脂基水门汀的剪切粘接强度。RelyX Unicem(3.94 兆帕)、Variolink II(8.52 兆帕)和 G-CEM Capsule(5.02 兆帕)的剪切粘结强度明显高于其自动混合的同类产品(P<.05)。在接受测试的水门汀中,Variolink II 的吸水性最低,剪切粘结强度最高。两种混合方法中的 RelyX 都表现出较低的溶解率。此外,无论采用哪种分配方法,RelyX 的厚度都保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of altering the dispensing methods of resin-based cements on their physical and bonding qualities.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Despite the advances in dental cements a significant gap remains in understanding how different dispensing and mixing techniques impact the physical properties of resin-based cements. PURPOSE The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate how the physical properties, shear bond strengths (before and after thermocycling), and film thickness of resin-based cements change based on the dispensing and mixing methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eight different resin-based cements were evaluated, and specimens were prepared for each method (n=14) by following International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards. The specimens were desiccated and immersed according to the ISO standard, and measurements were made to determine water sorption, solubility, mass change, and film thickness. Finally, specimens were thermocycled (5-55˚C for 20 000 cycles), and shear bond strength was evaluated. Statistical analysis was then performed with the 1- and 2-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05). RESULTS For Variolink Esthetic (automix, 30.03 µg/mm3), the Wsp was 74.8% greater than Variolink II (hand mix, 17.18 µg/mm3) and 682.3% more soluble (P<.05). The least soluble resin-based cements were RelyX Unicem (3.83 µg/mm3), RelyX Unicem 2 (2.22 µg/mm3), and Variolink II (2.43 µg/mm3). PANAVIA SA automix and G-CEM LinkAce automix had twice the film thickness as their hand mixed counterparts (P<.05). Thermocycling reduced the shear bond strength for most resin-based cements. RelyX Unicem (3.94 MPa), Variolink II (8.52 MPa), and G-CEM Capsule (5.02 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strength compared with their automix counterparts (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS The dispensing methods were found to significantly impact the properties of resin-based cements. Variolink II demonstrated the lowest water sorption and highest shear bond strength among the cements tested. RelyX in both mixing methods exhibited a low solubility rate. Additionally, RelyX showed consistent thickness, regardless of the different dispensing methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of altering the dispensing methods of resin-based cements on their physical and bonding qualities. Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prostheses: A systematic review. Evaluation of the optical and surface properties of monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics after simulated tooth-brushing. Evaluation of axial displacement and torque loss of Morse-type prosthetic abutments of different angular tapers to their respective implants. Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1