Early treatment response assessment with [177Lu]PSMA whole-body-scintigraphy compared to interim PSMA-PET

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is an essential tool for patient selection before radioligand therapy (RLT). Interim-staging with PSMA-PET during RLT allows for therapy monitoring. However, its added value over post-treatment imaging is poorly elucidated. The aim of this study was to compare early treatment response assessed by post-therapeutic whole-body scans (WBS) with interim-staging by PSMA-PET after 2 cycles in order to prognosticate OS. Men with metastasized castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) who had received at least two cycles of RLT, and interim PSMA-PET were evaluated retrospectively. PROMISE V2 framework was used to categorize PSMA expression and assess response to treatment. Response was defined as either disease control rate (DCR) for responders or progression for non-responders. A total of 188 men with mCRPC who underwent RLT between February 2015 and December 2021 were included. The comparison of different imaging modalities revealed a strong and significant correlation with Cramer V test: e.g. response on WBS during second cycle compared to interim PET after two cycles of RLT (cφ = 0.888, P < 0.001, n = 188). The median follow-up time was 14.7 months (range: 3–63 months; 125 deaths occurred). Median overall survival (OS) time was 14.5 months (95% CI: 11.9–15.9). In terms of OS analysis, early progression during therapy revealed a significantly higher likelihood of death: e.g. second cycle WBS (15 vs. 25 months, P < 0.001) with a HR of 2.81 (P < 0.001) or at PET timepoint after 2 cycles of RLT (11 vs. 24 months, P < 0.001) with a HR of 3.5 (P < 0.001). For early biochemical response, a PSA decline of at least 50% after two cycles of RLT indicates a significantly lower likelihood of death (26 vs. 17 months, P < 0.001) with a HR of 0.5 (P < 0.001). Response assessment of RLT by WBS and interim PET after two cycles of RLT have high congruence and can identify patients at risk of poor outcome. This indicates that interim PET might be omitted for response assessment, but future trials corroborating these findings are warranted.