{"title":"使用机器学习模型和物联网设备数据进行连续葡萄糖监测:荟萃分析","authors":"Yagyesh Kapoor,Yasha Hasija","doi":"10.3233/thc-241403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nMachine learning offers diverse options for effectively managing blood glucose levels in diabetes patients. Selecting the right ML algorithm is critical given the array of available choices. Integrating data from IoT devices presents promising opportunities to enhance real-time blood glucose management models.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models utilizing IoT device data for predicting blood glucose levels.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe systematically searched electronic databases for studies published between 2019 and 2023. We excluded studies lacking ML model derivation or performance metrics. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool assessed study quality. Our primary outcomes compared ML models for BG level prediction across different prediction horizons (PHs).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe analyzed ten eligible studies across prediction horizons of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes. ML models exhibited mean absolute RMSE values of 15.02 (SD 1.45), 21.488 (SD 2.92), 30.094 (SD 3.245), and 35.89 (SD 6.4) mg/dL, respectively. Random Forest demonstrated superior performance across these PHs.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWe observed significant heterogeneity across all subgroups, indicating diverse sources of variability. As the PH lengthened, the RMSE for blood glucose prediction by the ML model increased, with Random Forest showing the highest relative performance among the ML models.","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous glucose monitoring using machine learning models and IoT device data: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yagyesh Kapoor,Yasha Hasija\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/thc-241403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nMachine learning offers diverse options for effectively managing blood glucose levels in diabetes patients. Selecting the right ML algorithm is critical given the array of available choices. Integrating data from IoT devices presents promising opportunities to enhance real-time blood glucose management models.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nThis meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models utilizing IoT device data for predicting blood glucose levels.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe systematically searched electronic databases for studies published between 2019 and 2023. We excluded studies lacking ML model derivation or performance metrics. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool assessed study quality. Our primary outcomes compared ML models for BG level prediction across different prediction horizons (PHs).\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nWe analyzed ten eligible studies across prediction horizons of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes. ML models exhibited mean absolute RMSE values of 15.02 (SD 1.45), 21.488 (SD 2.92), 30.094 (SD 3.245), and 35.89 (SD 6.4) mg/dL, respectively. Random Forest demonstrated superior performance across these PHs.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nWe observed significant heterogeneity across all subgroups, indicating diverse sources of variability. As the PH lengthened, the RMSE for blood glucose prediction by the ML model increased, with Random Forest showing the highest relative performance among the ML models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-241403\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-241403","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景机器学习为有效管理糖尿病患者的血糖水平提供了多种选择。在众多可用选择中,选择正确的 ML 算法至关重要。整合物联网设备的数据为增强实时血糖管理模型提供了大有可为的机会。目的本荟萃分析旨在评估利用物联网设备数据预测血糖水平的机器学习模型的有效性。方法我们系统地搜索了电子数据库中 2019 年至 2023 年间发表的研究。我们排除了缺乏 ML 模型推导或性能指标的研究。诊断准确性研究质量评估工具对研究质量进行了评估。我们的主要结果比较了不同预测范围(PHs)内预测血糖水平的 ML 模型。结果我们分析了 10 项符合条件的研究,预测范围分别为 15、30、45 和 60 分钟。ML 模型的平均绝对 RMSE 值分别为 15.02 (SD 1.45)、21.488 (SD 2.92)、30.094 (SD 3.245) 和 35.89 (SD 6.4) mg/dL。我们在所有亚组中观察到了显著的异质性,这表明变异性的来源多种多样。随着 PH 的延长,ML 模型预测血糖的均方根误差(RMSE)也在增加,而随机森林在 ML 模型中表现出最高的相对性能。
Continuous glucose monitoring using machine learning models and IoT device data: A meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Machine learning offers diverse options for effectively managing blood glucose levels in diabetes patients. Selecting the right ML algorithm is critical given the array of available choices. Integrating data from IoT devices presents promising opportunities to enhance real-time blood glucose management models.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models utilizing IoT device data for predicting blood glucose levels.
METHODS
We systematically searched electronic databases for studies published between 2019 and 2023. We excluded studies lacking ML model derivation or performance metrics. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool assessed study quality. Our primary outcomes compared ML models for BG level prediction across different prediction horizons (PHs).
RESULTS
We analyzed ten eligible studies across prediction horizons of 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes. ML models exhibited mean absolute RMSE values of 15.02 (SD 1.45), 21.488 (SD 2.92), 30.094 (SD 3.245), and 35.89 (SD 6.4) mg/dL, respectively. Random Forest demonstrated superior performance across these PHs.
CONCLUSION
We observed significant heterogeneity across all subgroups, indicating diverse sources of variability. As the PH lengthened, the RMSE for blood glucose prediction by the ML model increased, with Random Forest showing the highest relative performance among the ML models.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).