使用二元各向同性混合物的新型两级喷射器制冷循环的能量和放能分析

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.08.016
{"title":"使用二元各向同性混合物的新型两级喷射器制冷循环的能量和放能分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To improve the ejector refrigeration cycle performance, this paper presents a theoretical thermodynamic analysis of a novel two-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (TSERC) with a gas-liquid separator using R134a/R32 and R600a/R290 as refrigerant. By separating the relatively low-boiling-point and high-boiling-point refrigerants, the cycle compression ratio decreases, the cycle performance increases, and the energy utilization efficiency can be improved. Energy and exergy analysis were conducted for the traditional single-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (SSERC) and TSERC. The effect of the mixture mass fraction on cycle performance under a fixed external heat source operating condition was studied, and the cycle performance comparisons between TSERC and SSERC at different evaporation temperature, condensation temperature and generation temperature were conducted. Results show that for TSERC, the maximum COP values 0.126 and 0.11, the maximum exergy efficiency 4.51 % and 4 % are obtained as the low-boiling-point mass fraction equals 0.6 and 0.4 respectively for R134a/R32 and R600a/R290. It is found that exergy destruction mainly occurs in the low-pressure sub-cycle of TSERC, the top three largest exergy destruction components are ejector 1, condenser 1 and generator 1, while the smallest exergy destruction occurs in pump 2. In addition, cycle performance comparison between SSERC and TSERC shows that the maximum COP improvement increased by 41.6 % and 89.6 % for 134a/R32 and R600a/R290 for TSERC, while the maximum entrainment ratio improvement increased by 32.4 % and 87.6 %. Moreover, it is concluded that the cycle performance improvement of TSERC is more significant at lower evaporation temperature, higher condensation temperature, and lower generation temperature compared to SSERC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14274,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy and exergy analysis of a novel two-stage ejector refrigeration cycle using binary zeotropic mixturesres\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2024.08.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To improve the ejector refrigeration cycle performance, this paper presents a theoretical thermodynamic analysis of a novel two-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (TSERC) with a gas-liquid separator using R134a/R32 and R600a/R290 as refrigerant. By separating the relatively low-boiling-point and high-boiling-point refrigerants, the cycle compression ratio decreases, the cycle performance increases, and the energy utilization efficiency can be improved. Energy and exergy analysis were conducted for the traditional single-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (SSERC) and TSERC. The effect of the mixture mass fraction on cycle performance under a fixed external heat source operating condition was studied, and the cycle performance comparisons between TSERC and SSERC at different evaporation temperature, condensation temperature and generation temperature were conducted. Results show that for TSERC, the maximum COP values 0.126 and 0.11, the maximum exergy efficiency 4.51 % and 4 % are obtained as the low-boiling-point mass fraction equals 0.6 and 0.4 respectively for R134a/R32 and R600a/R290. It is found that exergy destruction mainly occurs in the low-pressure sub-cycle of TSERC, the top three largest exergy destruction components are ejector 1, condenser 1 and generator 1, while the smallest exergy destruction occurs in pump 2. In addition, cycle performance comparison between SSERC and TSERC shows that the maximum COP improvement increased by 41.6 % and 89.6 % for 134a/R32 and R600a/R290 for TSERC, while the maximum entrainment ratio improvement increased by 32.4 % and 87.6 %. Moreover, it is concluded that the cycle performance improvement of TSERC is more significant at lower evaporation temperature, higher condensation temperature, and lower generation temperature compared to SSERC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700724002901\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Refrigeration-revue Internationale Du Froid","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140700724002901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高喷射器制冷循环的性能,本文对使用 R134a/R32 和 R600a/R290 作为制冷剂、带有气液分离器的新型两级喷射器制冷循环(TSERC)进行了理论热力学分析。通过分离相对低沸点和高沸点的制冷剂,降低了循环压缩比,提高了循环性能,提高了能源利用效率。对传统的单级喷射器制冷循环(SSERC)和 TSERC 进行了能量和放能分析。研究了在固定外部热源运行条件下混合物质量分数对循环性能的影响,并对 TSERC 和 SSERC 在不同蒸发温度、冷凝温度和发电温度下的循环性能进行了比较。结果表明,对于 TSERC,当 R134a/R32 和 R600a/R290 的低沸点质量分数分别等于 0.6 和 0.4 时,最大 COP 值分别为 0.126 和 0.11,最大放能效 率分别为 4.51 % 和 4 %。研究发现,放能破坏主要发生在 TSERC 的低压子循环中,放能破坏最大的前三个部分分别是喷射器 1、冷凝器 1 和发生器 1,而泵 2 的放能破坏最小。此外,SSERC 和 TSERC 的循环性能比较显示,TSERC 的 134a/R32 和 R600a/R290 的最大 COP 提高了 41.6 % 和 89.6 %,而最大夹带比提高了 32.4 % 和 87.6 %。此外,与 SSERC 相比,TSERC 在较低蒸发温度、较高冷凝温度和较低生成温度下的循环性能改善更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy and exergy analysis of a novel two-stage ejector refrigeration cycle using binary zeotropic mixturesres
To improve the ejector refrigeration cycle performance, this paper presents a theoretical thermodynamic analysis of a novel two-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (TSERC) with a gas-liquid separator using R134a/R32 and R600a/R290 as refrigerant. By separating the relatively low-boiling-point and high-boiling-point refrigerants, the cycle compression ratio decreases, the cycle performance increases, and the energy utilization efficiency can be improved. Energy and exergy analysis were conducted for the traditional single-stage ejector refrigeration cycle (SSERC) and TSERC. The effect of the mixture mass fraction on cycle performance under a fixed external heat source operating condition was studied, and the cycle performance comparisons between TSERC and SSERC at different evaporation temperature, condensation temperature and generation temperature were conducted. Results show that for TSERC, the maximum COP values 0.126 and 0.11, the maximum exergy efficiency 4.51 % and 4 % are obtained as the low-boiling-point mass fraction equals 0.6 and 0.4 respectively for R134a/R32 and R600a/R290. It is found that exergy destruction mainly occurs in the low-pressure sub-cycle of TSERC, the top three largest exergy destruction components are ejector 1, condenser 1 and generator 1, while the smallest exergy destruction occurs in pump 2. In addition, cycle performance comparison between SSERC and TSERC shows that the maximum COP improvement increased by 41.6 % and 89.6 % for 134a/R32 and R600a/R290 for TSERC, while the maximum entrainment ratio improvement increased by 32.4 % and 87.6 %. Moreover, it is concluded that the cycle performance improvement of TSERC is more significant at lower evaporation temperature, higher condensation temperature, and lower generation temperature compared to SSERC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.80%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Refrigeration is published for the International Institute of Refrigeration (IIR) by Elsevier. It is essential reading for all those wishing to keep abreast of research and industrial news in refrigeration, air conditioning and associated fields. This is particularly important in these times of rapid introduction of alternative refrigerants and the emergence of new technology. The journal has published special issues on alternative refrigerants and novel topics in the field of boiling, condensation, heat pumps, food refrigeration, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrocarbons, magnetic refrigeration at room temperature, sorptive cooling, phase change materials and slurries, ejector technology, compressors, and solar cooling. As well as original research papers the International Journal of Refrigeration also includes review articles, papers presented at IIR conferences, short reports and letters describing preliminary results and experimental details, and letters to the Editor on recent areas of discussion and controversy. Other features include forthcoming events, conference reports and book reviews. Papers are published in either English or French with the IIR news section in both languages.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring the heating energy performance of a heat wheel in a direct expansion air handling unit A centralized frost detection and estimation scheme for Internet-connected domestic refrigerators Research and thermal comfort analysis of the air conditioning system of the Ferris wheel car based on thermoelectric cooling Advanced model for a non-adiabatic capillary tube considering both subcooled liquid and non-equilibrium two-phase states of R-600a Quantitative detection of refrigerant charge faults in multi-unit air conditioning systems based on machine learning algorithms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1