利用液相色谱-串联质谱法验证全血中 82 种药物定量的多分析方法--包括自动制备校准物

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Drug Testing and Analysis Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1002/dta.3794
Andrea E Steuer, Maja Keller, Thomas Kraemer, Sandra N Poetzsch
{"title":"利用液相色谱-串联质谱法验证全血中 82 种药物定量的多分析方法--包括自动制备校准物","authors":"Andrea E Steuer, Maja Keller, Thomas Kraemer, Sandra N Poetzsch","doi":"10.1002/dta.3794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bioanalysis, such as the quantification of drugs in different matrices, is of great importance in forensic toxicology. Nowadays, mainly so-called multianalyte approaches are used given their increased speed and effectiveness. However, such multianalyte procedures can be difficult to develop and maintain with sufficient robustness in the laboratory. One aspect of this is the tedious, manual preparation of spiking solutions containing such a great number of analytes. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop and validate a fast, simple, and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of 82 classic drugs and to evaluate an alternative autosampler-assisted automated approach for the preparation of spiking solutions. Simple protein precipitation of 200-μL whole blood was used followed by analysis by reversed-phase LC-MS/MS in advanced scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was fully validated according to international guidelines, including selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, linearity, bias/imprecision, processed-sample stability, and limits. Validation criteria were fulfilled for all analytes except for buprenorphine and five benzodiazepines. In the context of a multianalyte procedure, a (multipurpose) autosampler-assisted automatic preparation of calibrator spiking solutions proved comparable to manual preparation. Thus, automated preparation can overcome the frequently performed manual, time-consuming, and error-prone steps of multianalyte approaches and still allow for customized calibration ranges. Since its introduction, more than 8000 cases have been measured with the presented method, and 35 proficiency tests have been passed.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multianalyte Approach-Including Automated Preparation of Calibrators-for Validated Quantification of 82 Drugs in Whole Blood by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea E Steuer, Maja Keller, Thomas Kraemer, Sandra N Poetzsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bioanalysis, such as the quantification of drugs in different matrices, is of great importance in forensic toxicology. Nowadays, mainly so-called multianalyte approaches are used given their increased speed and effectiveness. However, such multianalyte procedures can be difficult to develop and maintain with sufficient robustness in the laboratory. One aspect of this is the tedious, manual preparation of spiking solutions containing such a great number of analytes. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop and validate a fast, simple, and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of 82 classic drugs and to evaluate an alternative autosampler-assisted automated approach for the preparation of spiking solutions. Simple protein precipitation of 200-μL whole blood was used followed by analysis by reversed-phase LC-MS/MS in advanced scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was fully validated according to international guidelines, including selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, linearity, bias/imprecision, processed-sample stability, and limits. Validation criteria were fulfilled for all analytes except for buprenorphine and five benzodiazepines. In the context of a multianalyte procedure, a (multipurpose) autosampler-assisted automatic preparation of calibrator spiking solutions proved comparable to manual preparation. Thus, automated preparation can overcome the frequently performed manual, time-consuming, and error-prone steps of multianalyte approaches and still allow for customized calibration ranges. Since its introduction, more than 8000 cases have been measured with the presented method, and 35 proficiency tests have been passed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3794\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3794","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物分析,如不同基质中药物的定量,在法医毒理学中具有重要意义。目前主要采用所谓的多分析方法,因为这种方法速度更快,效果更好。然而,要在实验室中开发和维护此类多分析程序并使其具有足够的稳健性可能比较困难。其中一个原因是人工配制含有大量分析物的加标溶液非常繁琐。因此,本研究旨在开发并验证一种快速、简便、稳健的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法,用于定量检测 82 种经典药物,并评估另一种自动进样器辅助自动制备加标溶液的方法。对 200μL 全血进行简单的蛋白质沉淀,然后在先进的预定多反应监测(MRM)模式下进行反相液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS/MS)分析。该方法根据国际准则进行了全面验证,包括选择性、回收率、基质效应、线性度、偏差/精密度、处理样品的稳定性和限值。除丁丙诺啡和五种苯并二氮杂卓外,所有分析物均符合验证标准。事实证明,在多分析物程序中,(多用途)自动进样器辅助自动制备校准物加标溶液的效果与人工制备相当。因此,自动制备可以克服多分析方法中频繁执行的手动、耗时和易出错的步骤,并仍可实现定制校准范围。自推出以来,已使用该方法测量了 8000 多个病例,并通过了 35 次能力测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multianalyte Approach-Including Automated Preparation of Calibrators-for Validated Quantification of 82 Drugs in Whole Blood by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Bioanalysis, such as the quantification of drugs in different matrices, is of great importance in forensic toxicology. Nowadays, mainly so-called multianalyte approaches are used given their increased speed and effectiveness. However, such multianalyte procedures can be difficult to develop and maintain with sufficient robustness in the laboratory. One aspect of this is the tedious, manual preparation of spiking solutions containing such a great number of analytes. Therefore, the current study aimed to develop and validate a fast, simple, and robust liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of 82 classic drugs and to evaluate an alternative autosampler-assisted automated approach for the preparation of spiking solutions. Simple protein precipitation of 200-μL whole blood was used followed by analysis by reversed-phase LC-MS/MS in advanced scheduled multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method was fully validated according to international guidelines, including selectivity, recovery, matrix effects, linearity, bias/imprecision, processed-sample stability, and limits. Validation criteria were fulfilled for all analytes except for buprenorphine and five benzodiazepines. In the context of a multianalyte procedure, a (multipurpose) autosampler-assisted automatic preparation of calibrator spiking solutions proved comparable to manual preparation. Thus, automated preparation can overcome the frequently performed manual, time-consuming, and error-prone steps of multianalyte approaches and still allow for customized calibration ranges. Since its introduction, more than 8000 cases have been measured with the presented method, and 35 proficiency tests have been passed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
期刊最新文献
Determination of Hormonal Growth Promotants in Beef Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Detecting EPO in Microvolumetric Capillary Serum Shipped at Ambient Temperature for Antidoping Testing. Investigation Into the Equine Metabolism of Phosphodiesterase-4 Inhibitor Roflumilast for Potential Doping Control. UHPLC-QTOFMS Urine Drug Screening With Dilute-and-Shoot Sample Preparation and Vacuum-Insulated Probe-Heated Electrospray Ionization. Cover Picture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1