Iman Masoumi, Sabrina Maggio, Sandra De Iaco, Reza Ghezelbash
{"title":"估算地质氡危害指数的空间多标准方法。","authors":"Iman Masoumi, Sabrina Maggio, Sandra De Iaco, Reza Ghezelbash","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI) map plays a crucial role in evaluating radon exposure risks. The construction of this map requires a comprehensive analysis of radon levels in soil gas and some critical factors, such as uranium content in bedrock, soil permeability, and geological inhomogeneities. In this context, the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis is proposed with the aim of combining various key geological parameters and identifying high-potential radon areas. In particular, the multivariate integration involves the fuzzy gamma operator method and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely AHP-TOPSIS, which represents a novel approach in GRHI mapping. Thus, a comparison is provided through the definition of the GRHI maps of an unexplored study area, that is the Apulia region, located in Southern Italy. In order to evaluate the output maps, high radon potential areas are identified based on some available indoor radon measurement data. The success-rate curve, as a valid evaluation metric, is employed for the performance assessment and comparison of these two methods. The results demonstrate that although both generated GRHI maps are closely correlated with high-potential radon zones, the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method is preferable.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":" ","pages":"176419"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index.\",\"authors\":\"Iman Masoumi, Sabrina Maggio, Sandra De Iaco, Reza Ghezelbash\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI) map plays a crucial role in evaluating radon exposure risks. The construction of this map requires a comprehensive analysis of radon levels in soil gas and some critical factors, such as uranium content in bedrock, soil permeability, and geological inhomogeneities. In this context, the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis is proposed with the aim of combining various key geological parameters and identifying high-potential radon areas. In particular, the multivariate integration involves the fuzzy gamma operator method and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely AHP-TOPSIS, which represents a novel approach in GRHI mapping. Thus, a comparison is provided through the definition of the GRHI maps of an unexplored study area, that is the Apulia region, located in Southern Italy. In order to evaluate the output maps, high radon potential areas are identified based on some available indoor radon measurement data. The success-rate curve, as a valid evaluation metric, is employed for the performance assessment and comparison of these two methods. The results demonstrate that although both generated GRHI maps are closely correlated with high-potential radon zones, the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method is preferable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"176419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of the Total Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176419","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Spatial multi-criteria approaches for estimating geogenic radon hazard index.
The geogenic radon hazard index (GRHI) map plays a crucial role in evaluating radon exposure risks. The construction of this map requires a comprehensive analysis of radon levels in soil gas and some critical factors, such as uranium content in bedrock, soil permeability, and geological inhomogeneities. In this context, the spatial multi-criteria decision analysis is proposed with the aim of combining various key geological parameters and identifying high-potential radon areas. In particular, the multivariate integration involves the fuzzy gamma operator method and a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique, namely AHP-TOPSIS, which represents a novel approach in GRHI mapping. Thus, a comparison is provided through the definition of the GRHI maps of an unexplored study area, that is the Apulia region, located in Southern Italy. In order to evaluate the output maps, high radon potential areas are identified based on some available indoor radon measurement data. The success-rate curve, as a valid evaluation metric, is employed for the performance assessment and comparison of these two methods. The results demonstrate that although both generated GRHI maps are closely correlated with high-potential radon zones, the hybrid AHP-TOPSIS method is preferable.
期刊介绍:
The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere.
The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.