重症监护病房睡眠质量调查》关于导致重症儿童睡眠中断的环境因素的验证研究中家长的观点。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006403
Amanda B Hassinger, Kalgi Mody, Simon Li, Lauren K Flagg, E Vincent S Faustino, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Ryan K Breuer
{"title":"重症监护病房睡眠质量调查》关于导致重症儿童睡眠中断的环境因素的验证研究中家长的观点。","authors":"Amanda B Hassinger, Kalgi Mody, Simon Li, Lauren K Flagg, E Vincent S Faustino, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Ryan K Breuer","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sleep promotion bundles being tested in PICUs use elements adapted from adult bundles. As children may react differently than adults in ICU environments, this study investigated what parents report disrupted the sleep of their child in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter validation study of the Survey of Sleep quality in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Northeastern U.S. PICUs, one hospital-based pediatric sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Parents sleeping at the bedside of a child in the PICU or hospital-based sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Anonymous one-time survey eliciting parts of hospital or ICU environments that have been described as disruptive to sleep in validated adult ICU and pediatric inpatient questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Level of sleep disruption was scored by Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more disruption. Age, demographics, baseline sleep, and PICU exposures were used to describe causes of sleep disruption in a PICU. Of 152 PICU parents, 71% of their children's sleep was disrupted significantly by at least one aspect of being in the PICU. The most prevalent were \"being in pain or uncomfortable because they are sick\" (38%), \"not sleeping at home\" (30%), \"alarms on machines\" (28%), and \"not sleeping on their home schedule\" (26%). Only 5% were disrupted by excessive nocturnal light exposure. Overall sleep disruption was not different across four PICUs or in those receiving sedation. The validation study control group, healthy children undergoing polysomnography, had less sleep disruption than those in a PICU despite sleeping in a hospital-based sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are multiple aspects of critical care environments that affect the sleep of children, which are different from that of adults, such as disruption to home schedules. Future interventional sleep promotion bundles should include sedated children and could be applicable in multicenter settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e578-e588"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental Perspectives From the Survey of Sleep Quality in the PICU Validation Study on Environmental Factors Causing Sleep Disruption in Critically Ill Children.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda B Hassinger, Kalgi Mody, Simon Li, Lauren K Flagg, E Vincent S Faustino, Sapna R Kudchadkar, Ryan K Breuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sleep promotion bundles being tested in PICUs use elements adapted from adult bundles. As children may react differently than adults in ICU environments, this study investigated what parents report disrupted the sleep of their child in a PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a multicenter validation study of the Survey of Sleep quality in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four Northeastern U.S. PICUs, one hospital-based pediatric sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Parents sleeping at the bedside of a child in the PICU or hospital-based sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Anonymous one-time survey eliciting parts of hospital or ICU environments that have been described as disruptive to sleep in validated adult ICU and pediatric inpatient questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Level of sleep disruption was scored by Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more disruption. Age, demographics, baseline sleep, and PICU exposures were used to describe causes of sleep disruption in a PICU. Of 152 PICU parents, 71% of their children's sleep was disrupted significantly by at least one aspect of being in the PICU. The most prevalent were \\\"being in pain or uncomfortable because they are sick\\\" (38%), \\\"not sleeping at home\\\" (30%), \\\"alarms on machines\\\" (28%), and \\\"not sleeping on their home schedule\\\" (26%). Only 5% were disrupted by excessive nocturnal light exposure. Overall sleep disruption was not different across four PICUs or in those receiving sedation. The validation study control group, healthy children undergoing polysomnography, had less sleep disruption than those in a PICU despite sleeping in a hospital-based sleep laboratory.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are multiple aspects of critical care environments that affect the sleep of children, which are different from that of adults, such as disruption to home schedules. Future interventional sleep promotion bundles should include sedated children and could be applicable in multicenter settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e578-e588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006403\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:儿童重症监护病房正在测试的睡眠促进捆绑方案使用了从成人捆绑方案改编而来的元素。由于儿童在重症监护病房环境中的反应可能与成人不同,因此本研究调查了家长反映的影响儿童在重症监护病房睡眠的因素:设计:PICU 睡眠质量调查多中心验证研究的二次分析:美国东北部四所重症监护病房和一所医院儿科睡眠实验室:患者:在儿童重症监护病房或医院睡眠实验室中睡在患儿床边的家长:一次性匿名调查,在成人重症监护病房和儿科住院病人的有效问卷中列出医院或重症监护病房环境中影响睡眠的部分:睡眠干扰程度采用李克特量表进行评分,得分越高表示干扰程度越严重。年龄、人口统计学、基线睡眠和重症监护病房的暴露情况被用来描述重症监护病房睡眠紊乱的原因。在 152 名 PICU 家长中,71% 的孩子的睡眠受到了 PICU 中至少一个方面的严重干扰。最普遍的原因是 "因为生病而感到疼痛或不舒服"(38%)、"不能在家里睡觉"(30%)、"机器上的警报"(28%)和 "不能按照家里的时间表睡觉"(26%)。只有 5%的人是因为夜间光线过强而导致睡眠中断。在四所儿童重症监护病房和接受镇静剂治疗的儿童中,睡眠中断的总体情况并无不同。验证研究的对照组是接受多导睡眠图检查的健康儿童,尽管他们是在医院的睡眠实验室中睡眠,但他们的睡眠干扰程度低于重症监护病房的儿童:危重症护理环境的多个方面都会影响儿童的睡眠,这一点与成人不同,例如家庭时间安排的干扰。未来的干预性睡眠促进捆绑方案应包括使用镇静剂的儿童,并可适用于多中心环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental Perspectives From the Survey of Sleep Quality in the PICU Validation Study on Environmental Factors Causing Sleep Disruption in Critically Ill Children.

Objectives: Sleep promotion bundles being tested in PICUs use elements adapted from adult bundles. As children may react differently than adults in ICU environments, this study investigated what parents report disrupted the sleep of their child in a PICU.

Design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter validation study of the Survey of Sleep quality in the PICU.

Setting: Four Northeastern U.S. PICUs, one hospital-based pediatric sleep laboratory.

Patients: Parents sleeping at the bedside of a child in the PICU or hospital-based sleep laboratory.

Interventions: Anonymous one-time survey eliciting parts of hospital or ICU environments that have been described as disruptive to sleep in validated adult ICU and pediatric inpatient questionnaires.

Measurements and main results: Level of sleep disruption was scored by Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more disruption. Age, demographics, baseline sleep, and PICU exposures were used to describe causes of sleep disruption in a PICU. Of 152 PICU parents, 71% of their children's sleep was disrupted significantly by at least one aspect of being in the PICU. The most prevalent were "being in pain or uncomfortable because they are sick" (38%), "not sleeping at home" (30%), "alarms on machines" (28%), and "not sleeping on their home schedule" (26%). Only 5% were disrupted by excessive nocturnal light exposure. Overall sleep disruption was not different across four PICUs or in those receiving sedation. The validation study control group, healthy children undergoing polysomnography, had less sleep disruption than those in a PICU despite sleeping in a hospital-based sleep laboratory.

Conclusions: There are multiple aspects of critical care environments that affect the sleep of children, which are different from that of adults, such as disruption to home schedules. Future interventional sleep promotion bundles should include sedated children and could be applicable in multicenter settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Performance of the Healthy Aging Brain Care Monitor Self Report in Monitoring Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Among Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. The Need for Institutional Policies for Innovative Therapy: Existing Approaches and Key Elements. Vascular Complications After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A CT Study. The Impact of Multi-Institution Datasets on the Generalizability of Machine Learning Prediction Models in the ICU. ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1