评估 ChatGPT 在 MKSAP 心脏病学委员会复习题中的表现。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-12-15 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132576
Stefan Milutinovic , Marija Petrovic , Dustin Begosh-Mayne , Juan Lopez-Mattei , Richard A. Chazal , Malissa J. Wood , Ricardo O. Escarcega
{"title":"评估 ChatGPT 在 MKSAP 心脏病学委员会复习题中的表现。","authors":"Stefan Milutinovic ,&nbsp;Marija Petrovic ,&nbsp;Dustin Begosh-Mayne ,&nbsp;Juan Lopez-Mattei ,&nbsp;Richard A. Chazal ,&nbsp;Malissa J. Wood ,&nbsp;Ricardo O. Escarcega","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a natural language processing tool created by OpenAI. Much of the discussion regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is the ability of the language to enhance medical practice, improve efficiency and decrease errors. The objective of this study was to analyze the ability of ChatGPT to answer board-style cardiovascular medicine questions by using the <em>Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program</em> (MKSAP).The study evaluated the performance of ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4), alongside internal medicine residents and internal medicine and cardiology attendings, in answering 98 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from the Cardiovascular Medicine Chapter of MKSAP. ChatGPT-4 demonstrated an accuracy of 74.5 %, comparable to internal medicine (IM) intern (63.3 %), senior resident (63.3 %), internal medicine attending physician (62.2 %), and ChatGPT-3.5 (64.3 %) but significantly lower than cardiology attending physician (85.7 %). Subcategory analysis revealed no statistical difference between ChatGPT and physicians, except in valvular heart disease where cardiology attending outperformed ChatGPT (<em>p</em> = 0.031) for version 3.5, and for heart failure (<em>p</em> = 0.046) where ChatGPT-4 outperformed senior resident. While ChatGPT shows promise in certain subcategories, in order to establish AI as a reliable educational tool for medical professionals, performance of ChatGPT will likely need to surpass the accuracy of instructors, ideally achieving the near-perfect score on posed questions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"417 ","pages":"Article 132576"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Performance of ChatGPT on MKSAP Cardiology Board Review Questions\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Milutinovic ,&nbsp;Marija Petrovic ,&nbsp;Dustin Begosh-Mayne ,&nbsp;Juan Lopez-Mattei ,&nbsp;Richard A. Chazal ,&nbsp;Malissa J. Wood ,&nbsp;Ricardo O. Escarcega\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a natural language processing tool created by OpenAI. Much of the discussion regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is the ability of the language to enhance medical practice, improve efficiency and decrease errors. The objective of this study was to analyze the ability of ChatGPT to answer board-style cardiovascular medicine questions by using the <em>Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program</em> (MKSAP).The study evaluated the performance of ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4), alongside internal medicine residents and internal medicine and cardiology attendings, in answering 98 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from the Cardiovascular Medicine Chapter of MKSAP. ChatGPT-4 demonstrated an accuracy of 74.5 %, comparable to internal medicine (IM) intern (63.3 %), senior resident (63.3 %), internal medicine attending physician (62.2 %), and ChatGPT-3.5 (64.3 %) but significantly lower than cardiology attending physician (85.7 %). Subcategory analysis revealed no statistical difference between ChatGPT and physicians, except in valvular heart disease where cardiology attending outperformed ChatGPT (<em>p</em> = 0.031) for version 3.5, and for heart failure (<em>p</em> = 0.046) where ChatGPT-4 outperformed senior resident. While ChatGPT shows promise in certain subcategories, in order to establish AI as a reliable educational tool for medical professionals, performance of ChatGPT will likely need to surpass the accuracy of instructors, ideally achieving the near-perfect score on posed questions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\"417 \",\"pages\":\"Article 132576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324011987\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324011987","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

聊天生成预训练转换器(ChatGPT)是 OpenAI 开发的一种自然语言处理工具。关于人工智能(AI)在医学中的应用,人们讨论最多的是人工智能语言是否能增强医疗实践、提高效率和减少错误。本研究的目的是分析 ChatGPT 通过使用医学知识自我评估程序(MKSAP)回答董事会式心血管医学问题的能力。研究评估了 ChatGPT(3.5 版和 4 版)与内科住院医师、内科和心脏病科主治医师一起回答 MKSAP 心血管医学章节中 98 道多选题(MCQ)的表现。ChatGPT-4 的准确率为 74.5%,与内科实习生(63.3%)、高级住院医师(63.3%)、内科主治医师(62.2%)和 ChatGPT-3.5 (64.3%)相当,但明显低于心脏病学主治医师(85.7%)。子类别分析显示,ChatGPT 和医生之间没有统计学差异,但在瓣膜性心脏病方面,心脏病学主治医师的成绩优于 ChatGPT 3.5 版(p = 0.031),在心力衰竭方面(p = 0.046),ChatGPT-4 的成绩优于资深住院医师。虽然 ChatGPT 在某些子类别中显示出前景,但要将人工智能确立为医学专业人员的可靠教育工具,ChatGPT 的表现可能需要超过指导员的准确性,最好在提出的问题上达到接近满分的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Performance of ChatGPT on MKSAP Cardiology Board Review Questions
Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a natural language processing tool created by OpenAI. Much of the discussion regarding artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is the ability of the language to enhance medical practice, improve efficiency and decrease errors. The objective of this study was to analyze the ability of ChatGPT to answer board-style cardiovascular medicine questions by using the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program (MKSAP).The study evaluated the performance of ChatGPT (versions 3.5 and 4), alongside internal medicine residents and internal medicine and cardiology attendings, in answering 98 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) from the Cardiovascular Medicine Chapter of MKSAP. ChatGPT-4 demonstrated an accuracy of 74.5 %, comparable to internal medicine (IM) intern (63.3 %), senior resident (63.3 %), internal medicine attending physician (62.2 %), and ChatGPT-3.5 (64.3 %) but significantly lower than cardiology attending physician (85.7 %). Subcategory analysis revealed no statistical difference between ChatGPT and physicians, except in valvular heart disease where cardiology attending outperformed ChatGPT (p = 0.031) for version 3.5, and for heart failure (p = 0.046) where ChatGPT-4 outperformed senior resident. While ChatGPT shows promise in certain subcategories, in order to establish AI as a reliable educational tool for medical professionals, performance of ChatGPT will likely need to surpass the accuracy of instructors, ideally achieving the near-perfect score on posed questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Poor R-wave progression fails to detect anterior myocardial fibrosis in MESA Interaction between alveolar diffusing capacity and B-lines in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – A non-invasive exercise study Combined left and right atrial reservoir strain identifies a high-risk phenotype in patients with chronic heart failure Comparative assessment of 4D CT-derived geometric and effective orifice areas in severe aortic stenosis Editorial to ‘atorvastatin and left ventricular strain during anthracycline-based chemotherapy’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1