评估乳酸菌后益生菌对艰难梭菌的抗菌、抗生物膜和抗毒作用。

IF 1.3 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY Iranian Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16309
Mahdi Asghari Ozma, Hamideh Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini, Mohammad Hossein Ataee, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini
{"title":"评估乳酸菌后益生菌对艰难梭菌的抗菌、抗生物膜和抗毒作用。","authors":"Mahdi Asghari Ozma, Hamideh Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini, Mohammad Hossein Ataee, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea is <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection (CDI), which causes severe and recurring symptoms. The increase of antibiotic-resistant <i>C. difficile</i> requires alternate treatments. Postbiotics, metabolites produced by probiotics, fight CDI owing to their antibacterial capabilities. This study aims to evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic potential of postbiotics in combating CDI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>GC-MS evaluated postbiotics from <i>Bifidobacterium bifidum</i> and <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i>. Disk diffusion and broth microdilution determined <i>C. difficile</i> antibacterial inhibition zones and MICs. Microtiter plates assessed antibiofilm activity. MTT assay evaluated postbiotics anti-viability on HEK293. ELISA testing postbiotic detoxification of toxins A and B. Postbiotics were examined for <i>tcdA</i> and <i>tcdB</i> genes expression using real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most identified <i>B. bifidum</i> and <i>L. plantarum</i> postbiotic compounds were glycolic acid (7.2%) and butyric acid (13.57%). <i>B. bifidum</i> and <i>L. plantarum</i> displayed 13 and 10 mm inhibition zones and 2.5 and 5 mg/ml MICs against <i>C. difficile. B. bifidum</i> reduced biofilm at 1.25 mg/ml by 49% and <i>L. plantarum</i> by 31%. MTT assay showed both postbiotics had little influence on cell viability, which was over 80%. The detoxification power of postbiotics revealed that <i>B. bifidum</i> decreased toxin A and B production more effectively than <i>L. plantarum</i>, and also their related <i>tcdA</i> and <i>tcdB</i> genes expression reduction were statistically significant (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postbiotics' ability to inhibit bacterial growth, biofilm disruption, and toxin reduction makes them a promising adjunctive for CDI treatment and a good solution to pathogens' antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"16 4","pages":"497-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic effects of postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria on <i>Clostridium difficile</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Mahdi Asghari Ozma, Hamideh Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini, Mohammad Hossein Ataee, Seyed Ali Mirhosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea is <i>Clostridium difficile</i> infection (CDI), which causes severe and recurring symptoms. The increase of antibiotic-resistant <i>C. difficile</i> requires alternate treatments. Postbiotics, metabolites produced by probiotics, fight CDI owing to their antibacterial capabilities. This study aims to evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic potential of postbiotics in combating CDI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>GC-MS evaluated postbiotics from <i>Bifidobacterium bifidum</i> and <i>Lactobacillus plantarum</i>. Disk diffusion and broth microdilution determined <i>C. difficile</i> antibacterial inhibition zones and MICs. Microtiter plates assessed antibiofilm activity. MTT assay evaluated postbiotics anti-viability on HEK293. ELISA testing postbiotic detoxification of toxins A and B. Postbiotics were examined for <i>tcdA</i> and <i>tcdB</i> genes expression using real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most identified <i>B. bifidum</i> and <i>L. plantarum</i> postbiotic compounds were glycolic acid (7.2%) and butyric acid (13.57%). <i>B. bifidum</i> and <i>L. plantarum</i> displayed 13 and 10 mm inhibition zones and 2.5 and 5 mg/ml MICs against <i>C. difficile. B. bifidum</i> reduced biofilm at 1.25 mg/ml by 49% and <i>L. plantarum</i> by 31%. MTT assay showed both postbiotics had little influence on cell viability, which was over 80%. The detoxification power of postbiotics revealed that <i>B. bifidum</i> decreased toxin A and B production more effectively than <i>L. plantarum</i>, and also their related <i>tcdA</i> and <i>tcdB</i> genes expression reduction were statistically significant (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postbiotics' ability to inhibit bacterial growth, biofilm disruption, and toxin reduction makes them a promising adjunctive for CDI treatment and a good solution to pathogens' antibiotic resistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"497-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11389761/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v16i4.16309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是医疗相关性腹泻最常见的病因,会导致严重和反复的症状。随着耐抗生素艰难梭菌的增加,需要采用其他治疗方法。益生菌产生的代谢产物--后益生菌因其抗菌能力而可对抗艰难梭菌感染。本研究旨在评估益生菌后物质在抗击艰难梭菌方面的抗菌、抗生物膜和抗毒潜力:GC-MS 评估了双歧杆菌和植物乳杆菌的益生元。盘式扩散和肉汤微量稀释法测定艰难梭菌抗菌抑菌区和 MIC。微孔板评估抗生物膜活性。MTT 试验评估了益生菌对 HEK293 的抗活力。使用实时 PCR 检测益生菌的 tcdA 和 tcdB 基因表达:结果:发现最多的双歧杆菌和植物乳杆菌益生菌后化合物是乙醇酸(7.2%)和丁酸(13.57%)。双歧杆菌和植物乳杆菌对艰难梭菌的抑制区分别为 13 毫米和 10 毫米,最小抑菌浓度分别为 2.5 毫克/毫升和 5 毫克/毫升。双歧杆菌能将 1.25 毫克/毫升的生物膜减少 49%,植物乳杆菌减少 31%。MTT 检测显示,两种益生菌对细胞存活率的影响都很小,都超过了 80%。益生菌的解毒能力表明,双歧杆菌比植物乳杆菌更有效地减少了毒素 A 和毒素 B 的产生,而且它们相关的 tcdA 和 tcdB 基因表达量的减少也有统计学意义(P < 0.05):结论:后益生菌具有抑制细菌生长、破坏生物膜和减少毒素的能力,因此是一种很有前景的 CDI 辅助治疗药物,也是解决病原体抗生素耐药性的一种好办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic effects of postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria on Clostridium difficile.

Background and objectives: The most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea is Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), which causes severe and recurring symptoms. The increase of antibiotic-resistant C. difficile requires alternate treatments. Postbiotics, metabolites produced by probiotics, fight CDI owing to their antibacterial capabilities. This study aims to evaluate the antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anti-toxigenic potential of postbiotics in combating CDI.

Materials and methods: GC-MS evaluated postbiotics from Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus plantarum. Disk diffusion and broth microdilution determined C. difficile antibacterial inhibition zones and MICs. Microtiter plates assessed antibiofilm activity. MTT assay evaluated postbiotics anti-viability on HEK293. ELISA testing postbiotic detoxification of toxins A and B. Postbiotics were examined for tcdA and tcdB genes expression using real-time PCR.

Results: The most identified B. bifidum and L. plantarum postbiotic compounds were glycolic acid (7.2%) and butyric acid (13.57%). B. bifidum and L. plantarum displayed 13 and 10 mm inhibition zones and 2.5 and 5 mg/ml MICs against C. difficile. B. bifidum reduced biofilm at 1.25 mg/ml by 49% and L. plantarum by 31%. MTT assay showed both postbiotics had little influence on cell viability, which was over 80%. The detoxification power of postbiotics revealed that B. bifidum decreased toxin A and B production more effectively than L. plantarum, and also their related tcdA and tcdB genes expression reduction were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Postbiotics' ability to inhibit bacterial growth, biofilm disruption, and toxin reduction makes them a promising adjunctive for CDI treatment and a good solution to pathogens' antibiotic resistance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiota and graft-versus-host disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Increased incidence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis in the skin and nasal carriage among healthcare workers and inanimate hospital surfaces after the COVID-19 pandemic. Is routine screening for Candida auris necessary in ICU? MIC trends of vancomycin and teicoplanin among methicillin resistant CoNS isolates from new born blood cultures in a tertiary care centre in Southern India. Molecular detection of Epstein-Barr virus in paraffin-embedded tissue samples of patients suffering gastric cancer in Ahvaz, Iran: a case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1