确定影响阿根廷晚期乳腺癌 CDK4/6 抑制剂治疗的临床病理因素

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00056
Federico Waisberg, Pablo Mandó, Carolina Almada, Naima Kassis, Andrea Mainella, Luciano Cermignani, María Cecilia Riggi, Melina Winocur, Ramiro González, Andres Guercovich, Natalia Ayala, Cristian Micheri, Ana Carolina Ituarte, Lucía González Mattos, Pamela Llugdar, Mónica Casalnuovo, Maribel Lutteral, Sebastián Cinquini, Alejandro Mazzotta, Janeth Lara Alcantara, Rosa Penayo, Gonzalo Gomez-Abuin
{"title":"确定影响阿根廷晚期乳腺癌 CDK4/6 抑制剂治疗的临床病理因素","authors":"Federico Waisberg, Pablo Mandó, Carolina Almada, Naima Kassis, Andrea Mainella, Luciano Cermignani, María Cecilia Riggi, Melina Winocur, Ramiro González, Andres Guercovich, Natalia Ayala, Cristian Micheri, Ana Carolina Ituarte, Lucía González Mattos, Pamela Llugdar, Mónica Casalnuovo, Maribel Lutteral, Sebastián Cinquini, Alejandro Mazzotta, Janeth Lara Alcantara, Rosa Penayo, Gonzalo Gomez-Abuin","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 <i>v</i> 8.7 months, <i>P</i> = .00045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"10 ","pages":"e2400056"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Clinicopathologic Factors That Influence Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer in Argentina After CDK4/6 Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Waisberg, Pablo Mandó, Carolina Almada, Naima Kassis, Andrea Mainella, Luciano Cermignani, María Cecilia Riggi, Melina Winocur, Ramiro González, Andres Guercovich, Natalia Ayala, Cristian Micheri, Ana Carolina Ituarte, Lucía González Mattos, Pamela Llugdar, Mónica Casalnuovo, Maribel Lutteral, Sebastián Cinquini, Alejandro Mazzotta, Janeth Lara Alcantara, Rosa Penayo, Gonzalo Gomez-Abuin\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO.24.00056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 <i>v</i> 8.7 months, <i>P</i> = .00045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e2400056\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:激素受体阳性(HR+)/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)在一线细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDKi)和内分泌治疗进展后的最佳治疗顺序尚不明确。需要阐明影响二线治疗选择和疗效的临床和生物学因素:这是一项对真实世界队列的回顾性分析,包括在一线治疗中接受CDKi和内分泌治疗并出现进展、需要二线治疗的HR+/HER2- ABC患者。对临床和生物学因素进行了分析,以评估这些因素与日常治疗决策的关联以及无进展生存期(PFS)在二线治疗中的预后作用:结果:共纳入 235 名患者。60%的患者接受了激素治疗,40%的患者接受了化疗。二线治疗的中位生存期为6.6个月,不同治疗类型之间没有差异。在多变量分析中,绝经后状态、较低的Ki-67表达和非新发的IV期疾病与二线(2L)PFS的改善有关。绝经状态与治疗类型有明显的交互作用,绝经前患者接受以高密度脂蛋白为基础的治疗,其PFS降低(4.7个月对8.7个月,P = .00045):在我们的研究中,治疗决定反映了我们临床指南中的现行算法,先前的治疗反应是决定2L治疗决定的最相关因素。在这种情况下,绝经状态与后续治疗的疗效相互影响。因此,我们认为在临床试验的亚组分析中应常规评估绝经状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining Clinicopathologic Factors That Influence Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer in Argentina After CDK4/6 Inhibitors.

Purpose: The optimal treatment sequence for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on first-line cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi) and endocrine therapy is unclear. Clinical and biological factors influencing treatment choices and outcomes in the second-line setting need to be elucidated.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a real-world cohort including patients with HR+/HER2- ABC who received CDKi and endocrine therapy in the first-line setting and progressed, requiring second-line treatment. Clinical and biological factors were analyzed to evaluate their association with daily treatment decisions and the prognostic role of progression-free survival (PFS) in the second-line setting.

Results: Two hundred thirty-five patients were included. Second-line treatments were hormone therapy (HT) based in 60% and chemotherapy based in 40% of patients. The second-line median PFS was 6.6 months, with no difference between treatment types. In multivariable analysis, postmenopausal status, lower Ki-67 expression, and non-de novo stage IV disease were associated with improved second-line (2L) PFS. Menopausal status significantly interacted with treatment type, with reduced PFS in premenopausal patients receiving HT-based treatments (4.7 v 8.7 months, P = .00045).

Conclusion: In our study, treatment decisions reflected the current algorithm incorporated in our clinical guidelines, and prior treatment response was the most relevant factor to determine 2L treatment decision. Menopausal status interacted with the subsequent therapy efficacy in this setting. Hence, we consider that menopausal status should be routinely evaluated in the subgroup analysis of clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beliefs on Causes of Cancer in the General Population, and the Association With Risk Perception and Lifestyle in a Multiethnic Setting. Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar Cetuximab Versus Innovator Cetuximab in Indian Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial. Evaluation of the Stronger Together Peer Mentoring Model Among Patients With Breast and Gynecologic Cancer in Viet Nam. Germline Genetic Susceptibility Testing Among Emirati Nationals at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Health-Related Quality of Life and Financial Burden in Ethiopian Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1