{"title":"成年非裔美国人和白人维生素 D 缺乏与糖尿病之间的关系:一项 NHANES 研究。","authors":"Alula Hadgu, Fengxia Yan, Robert Mayberry","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetes and see if this association is the same for adult (age ≥ 20) African Americans (AAs) and Whites. The secondary objective is to examine the distribution of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test among AAs and Whites and to evaluate the appropriateness of using the same cut-off point for both groups to diagnose VDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our analysis is based on the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We used two common propensity score adjustment methods to analyze the data-propensity score matching (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of diabetes for AAs and Whites was 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) and 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%), respectively. The prevalence of VDD for AAs and Whites was 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) and 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%), respectively. Under PSM, the odds ratios for the diabetes-VDD association for AAs and Whites were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.27) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.49-3.13), respectively. Under IPTW, the VDD-diabetes odds ratios for AAs and Whites were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.67-3.30), respectively. Our results further demonstrate that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements are significantly different for AAs and Whites across the general population, as well as the vitamin D-sufficient and vitamin D-deficient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of VDD and diabetes was higher for AAs compared to Whites. However, VDD was associated with increased diabetes risk for Whites but not for AAs. Though more research is needed to explain why this is the case, a reason for this may be that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test or its associated cut-off point for defining VDD may not accurately reflect the vitamin D status among AAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alula Hadgu, Fengxia Yan, Robert Mayberry\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetes and see if this association is the same for adult (age ≥ 20) African Americans (AAs) and Whites. The secondary objective is to examine the distribution of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test among AAs and Whites and to evaluate the appropriateness of using the same cut-off point for both groups to diagnose VDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our analysis is based on the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We used two common propensity score adjustment methods to analyze the data-propensity score matching (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of diabetes for AAs and Whites was 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) and 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%), respectively. The prevalence of VDD for AAs and Whites was 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) and 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%), respectively. Under PSM, the odds ratios for the diabetes-VDD association for AAs and Whites were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.27) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.49-3.13), respectively. Under IPTW, the VDD-diabetes odds ratios for AAs and Whites were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.67-3.30), respectively. Our results further demonstrate that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements are significantly different for AAs and Whites across the general population, as well as the vitamin D-sufficient and vitamin D-deficient populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of VDD and diabetes was higher for AAs compared to Whites. However, VDD was associated with increased diabetes risk for Whites but not for AAs. Though more research is needed to explain why this is the case, a reason for this may be that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test or its associated cut-off point for defining VDD may not accurately reflect the vitamin D status among AAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02144-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的这项横断面研究的主要目的是调查维生素 D 缺乏症(VDD)与糖尿病之间的关系,并了解成年(年龄≥20 岁)非裔美国人(AAs)与白人之间的关系是否相同。次要目标是研究25-羟基维生素D测试在非裔美国人和白人中的分布情况,并评估在两个群体中使用相同的临界点诊断VDD是否合适:我们的分析基于 2011-2014 年美国国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)。我们使用了两种常见的倾向得分调整方法来分析数据--倾向得分匹配法(PSM)和反向治疗概率加权法(IPTW):结果:AA 和白人的糖尿病患病率分别为 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) 和 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%)。AAs 和白人的 VDD 患病率分别为 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) 和 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%)。在 PSM 条件下,AA 和白人的糖尿病与VDD 关联的几率比分别为 0.94(95% CI,0.70-1.27)和 2.16(95% CI,1.49-3.13)。在 IPTW 条件下,AA 人和白人的 VDD-糖尿病几率比分别为 0.83(95% CI,0.64-1.10)和 2.35(95% CI,1.67-3.30)。我们的研究结果进一步表明,在普通人群、维生素 D 充足人群和维生素 D 缺乏人群中,AA 族人和白人的 25- 羟维生素 D 测量值存在显著差异:结论:与白人相比,亚裔美国人的维生素 D 缺乏症和糖尿病发病率更高。然而,对于白人而言,VDD 与糖尿病风险的增加有关,而对于亚裔美国人则无关。虽然还需要更多的研究来解释为什么会出现这种情况,但其中一个原因可能是 25- 羟维生素 D 测试或其相关的用于定义 VDD 的临界点可能无法准确反映 AA 人的维生素 D 状态。
The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.
Objective: The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to investigate the association between vitamin D deficiency (VDD) and diabetes and see if this association is the same for adult (age ≥ 20) African Americans (AAs) and Whites. The secondary objective is to examine the distribution of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test among AAs and Whites and to evaluate the appropriateness of using the same cut-off point for both groups to diagnose VDD.
Methods: Our analysis is based on the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We used two common propensity score adjustment methods to analyze the data-propensity score matching (PSM) and the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).
Results: The prevalence of diabetes for AAs and Whites was 12.27% (95% CI, 10.47-14.07%) and 7.24% (95% CI, 6.35-8.13%), respectively. The prevalence of VDD for AAs and Whites was 65.29% (95% CI, 62.01-68.58%) and 19.49% (95% CI, 16.53-22.45%), respectively. Under PSM, the odds ratios for the diabetes-VDD association for AAs and Whites were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70-1.27) and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.49-3.13), respectively. Under IPTW, the VDD-diabetes odds ratios for AAs and Whites were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.64-1.10) and 2.35 (95% CI, 1.67-3.30), respectively. Our results further demonstrate that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurements are significantly different for AAs and Whites across the general population, as well as the vitamin D-sufficient and vitamin D-deficient populations.
Conclusion: The prevalence of VDD and diabetes was higher for AAs compared to Whites. However, VDD was associated with increased diabetes risk for Whites but not for AAs. Though more research is needed to explain why this is the case, a reason for this may be that the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test or its associated cut-off point for defining VDD may not accurately reflect the vitamin D status among AAs.