Arn Migowski , Gustavo Tavares Lameiro da Costa , Helena Cramer Veiga Rey
{"title":"全国性复杂调查样本中的新生儿脉搏血氧仪筛查覆盖率:对巴西地区一级先天性心脏病早期检测计划的评估。","authors":"Arn Migowski , Gustavo Tavares Lameiro da Costa , Helena Cramer Veiga Rey","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate the coverage of newborn pulse oximetry screening (POS) in Brazil, as well as identifies associated factors and the proportion of positive screening results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Coverage was estimated based on the most recent National Health Survey (2019). Adjusted marginal prevalence ratios were estimated via poisson regression model with robust variance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The POS coverage was 66.3 % (95 %CI: 65.5–67.1; <em>N</em> = 3,140,023) and was higher in children born in privately funded hospitals (PFHs) than in the Unified Health System (SUS): 78.1 % (76.7–79.5) versus 61.1 % (60.2–62.1). In the North region, the POS coverage in PFHs (64.9 %, 59.7–70.1) was lower than that in the South (82.5 %, 79.4–85.6) and the Southeast (81.5 %, 79.3–83.6); it was even lower in SUS in the North (44.0 %; 42.4–45.6). After a federal ordinance providing financial resources to postscreening diagnostic, the screening coverage in SUS increased from 57.6 % (56.2–59.1) to 64.6 % (63.3–65.9). The proportion of positive screening tests was 9.2 % (8.9–9.5) in SUS and 7.8 % (7.3–8.3) in PFHs, of which 40.8 % (40.5–41.1) underwent complementary exams in SUS and 57.2 % (56.7–57.7) in PFHs. In the multivariate model, the main independent predictors of POS were the coverage of other newborn screening tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inequalities were found between major regions and healthcare systems. Government financial incentives have reduced this inequality, although the percentage of postscreening complementary exams remains insufficient and unequal. The main independent predictors of screening prevalence were those related to the organization of health services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 108141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002962/pdfft?md5=c267af2118b2a8aab8d382ff656d8916&pid=1-s2.0-S0091743524002962-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Newborn pulse oximetry screening coverage in a nationwide complex survey sample: An assessment of a congenital heart disease early detection program at the regional level in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Arn Migowski , Gustavo Tavares Lameiro da Costa , Helena Cramer Veiga Rey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To estimate the coverage of newborn pulse oximetry screening (POS) in Brazil, as well as identifies associated factors and the proportion of positive screening results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Coverage was estimated based on the most recent National Health Survey (2019). Adjusted marginal prevalence ratios were estimated via poisson regression model with robust variance.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The POS coverage was 66.3 % (95 %CI: 65.5–67.1; <em>N</em> = 3,140,023) and was higher in children born in privately funded hospitals (PFHs) than in the Unified Health System (SUS): 78.1 % (76.7–79.5) versus 61.1 % (60.2–62.1). In the North region, the POS coverage in PFHs (64.9 %, 59.7–70.1) was lower than that in the South (82.5 %, 79.4–85.6) and the Southeast (81.5 %, 79.3–83.6); it was even lower in SUS in the North (44.0 %; 42.4–45.6). After a federal ordinance providing financial resources to postscreening diagnostic, the screening coverage in SUS increased from 57.6 % (56.2–59.1) to 64.6 % (63.3–65.9). The proportion of positive screening tests was 9.2 % (8.9–9.5) in SUS and 7.8 % (7.3–8.3) in PFHs, of which 40.8 % (40.5–41.1) underwent complementary exams in SUS and 57.2 % (56.7–57.7) in PFHs. In the multivariate model, the main independent predictors of POS were the coverage of other newborn screening tests.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Inequalities were found between major regions and healthcare systems. Government financial incentives have reduced this inequality, although the percentage of postscreening complementary exams remains insufficient and unequal. The main independent predictors of screening prevalence were those related to the organization of health services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"volume\":\"189 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002962/pdfft?md5=c267af2118b2a8aab8d382ff656d8916&pid=1-s2.0-S0091743524002962-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002962\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743524002962","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Newborn pulse oximetry screening coverage in a nationwide complex survey sample: An assessment of a congenital heart disease early detection program at the regional level in Brazil
Objectives
To estimate the coverage of newborn pulse oximetry screening (POS) in Brazil, as well as identifies associated factors and the proportion of positive screening results.
Methods
Coverage was estimated based on the most recent National Health Survey (2019). Adjusted marginal prevalence ratios were estimated via poisson regression model with robust variance.
Results
The POS coverage was 66.3 % (95 %CI: 65.5–67.1; N = 3,140,023) and was higher in children born in privately funded hospitals (PFHs) than in the Unified Health System (SUS): 78.1 % (76.7–79.5) versus 61.1 % (60.2–62.1). In the North region, the POS coverage in PFHs (64.9 %, 59.7–70.1) was lower than that in the South (82.5 %, 79.4–85.6) and the Southeast (81.5 %, 79.3–83.6); it was even lower in SUS in the North (44.0 %; 42.4–45.6). After a federal ordinance providing financial resources to postscreening diagnostic, the screening coverage in SUS increased from 57.6 % (56.2–59.1) to 64.6 % (63.3–65.9). The proportion of positive screening tests was 9.2 % (8.9–9.5) in SUS and 7.8 % (7.3–8.3) in PFHs, of which 40.8 % (40.5–41.1) underwent complementary exams in SUS and 57.2 % (56.7–57.7) in PFHs. In the multivariate model, the main independent predictors of POS were the coverage of other newborn screening tests.
Conclusions
Inequalities were found between major regions and healthcare systems. Government financial incentives have reduced this inequality, although the percentage of postscreening complementary exams remains insufficient and unequal. The main independent predictors of screening prevalence were those related to the organization of health services.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.