睡眠与妄想症:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503
{"title":"睡眠与妄想症:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sleep dysfunction commonly co-occurs with paranoia and is hypothesised to be a contributory causal mechanism in its development and maintenance.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically review and quantitatively evaluate the evidence for the relationship between sleep dysfunction and paranoia across the spectrum of severity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies investigating the relationship between aspects of sleep and paranoia across clinical and non-clinical groups. A random effects model using a Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient was used for meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>45 studies were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis. The literature supports a small-to-moderate association (<em>r</em> = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.40 for the seven studies using the most robust measures) with significant heterogeneity among studies but no evidence of publication bias. There is evidence that the relationship is to some extent causal, with sleep disruption leading to increased paranoia, though there is also some evidence of a bi-directional relationship. Negative affect is frequently seen as a mediator of this relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review for the first time examines the significant relationship between sleep and paranoia individually. Studies are needed that further assess the potential for early intervention of sleep dysfunction in those experiencing paranoia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001247/pdfft?md5=fd161cf1bc44ccfe86fd82094c6c1636&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001247-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sleep dysfunction commonly co-occurs with paranoia and is hypothesised to be a contributory causal mechanism in its development and maintenance.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To systematically review and quantitatively evaluate the evidence for the relationship between sleep dysfunction and paranoia across the spectrum of severity.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted to identify studies investigating the relationship between aspects of sleep and paranoia across clinical and non-clinical groups. A random effects model using a Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient was used for meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>45 studies were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis. The literature supports a small-to-moderate association (<em>r</em> = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.40 for the seven studies using the most robust measures) with significant heterogeneity among studies but no evidence of publication bias. There is evidence that the relationship is to some extent causal, with sleep disruption leading to increased paranoia, though there is also some evidence of a bi-directional relationship. Negative affect is frequently seen as a mediator of this relationship.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review for the first time examines the significant relationship between sleep and paranoia individually. Studies are needed that further assess the potential for early intervention of sleep dysfunction in those experiencing paranoia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001247/pdfft?md5=fd161cf1bc44ccfe86fd82094c6c1636&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001247-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001247\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:睡眠功能障碍通常与妄想症同时出现,并被假定为妄想症发展和维持的一个促成因果机制:系统回顾并定量评估睡眠功能障碍与妄想症严重程度之间关系的证据:方法:进行系统检索,以确定在临床和非临床群体中调查睡眠方面与妄想症之间关系的研究。采用费舍尔r-z转换相关系数的随机效应模型进行荟萃分析:45项研究被纳入综述,14项研究被纳入荟萃分析。文献支持小到中等程度的相关性(采用最稳健测量方法的 7 项研究的相关系数为 0.30,95 % CI:0.16-0.40),研究之间存在显著的异质性,但没有证据表明存在发表偏倚。有证据表明,这种关系在一定程度上是因果关系,睡眠中断会导致妄想症的增加,但也有证据表明这种关系是双向的。消极情绪经常被视为这种关系的中介因素:本综述首次单独研究了睡眠与妄想症之间的重要关系。需要开展研究,进一步评估对妄想症患者的睡眠功能障碍进行早期干预的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Sleep dysfunction commonly co-occurs with paranoia and is hypothesised to be a contributory causal mechanism in its development and maintenance.

Objectives

To systematically review and quantitatively evaluate the evidence for the relationship between sleep dysfunction and paranoia across the spectrum of severity.

Method

A systematic search was conducted to identify studies investigating the relationship between aspects of sleep and paranoia across clinical and non-clinical groups. A random effects model using a Fisher r-to-z transformed correlation coefficient was used for meta-analysis.

Results

45 studies were included in the review and 14 in the meta-analysis. The literature supports a small-to-moderate association (r = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.16–0.40 for the seven studies using the most robust measures) with significant heterogeneity among studies but no evidence of publication bias. There is evidence that the relationship is to some extent causal, with sleep disruption leading to increased paranoia, though there is also some evidence of a bi-directional relationship. Negative affect is frequently seen as a mediator of this relationship.

Conclusion

This review for the first time examines the significant relationship between sleep and paranoia individually. Studies are needed that further assess the potential for early intervention of sleep dysfunction in those experiencing paranoia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates Gender nonconformity and common mental health problems: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1