巴西圣保罗一家医院护理团队的胃造口术管理:最佳实践实施项目。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459
Michele Coelho Vicente, Mariana Bucci Sanches, Jeferson Castelani Fabri, Gilmar Faustino da Cunha, Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Vilanice Alves de Araujo Püschel
{"title":"巴西圣保罗一家医院护理团队的胃造口术管理:最佳实践实施项目。","authors":"Michele Coelho Vicente, Mariana Bucci Sanches, Jeferson Castelani Fabri, Gilmar Faustino da Cunha, Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Vilanice Alves de Araujo Püschel","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastrostomy management by the nursing team in a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil: a best practice implementation project.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Coelho Vicente, Mariana Bucci Sanches, Jeferson Castelani Fabri, Gilmar Faustino da Cunha, Leonardo de Souza Carvalho, Vilanice Alves de Araujo Püschel\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jbi Evidence Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000459","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:有效管理胃造口患者应以最佳实践为基础:胃造口术患者的高效管理应以最佳实践为基础:该项目旨在改善巴西圣保罗一家私立医院半重症监护病房的胃造口管理:本研究遵循 JBI 证据实施框架。JBI 的证据实施方法以审计、反馈和再审计策略为基础。通过基线审计,对照推荐的最佳实践来衡量当前的做法。审计反馈用于确定障碍和设计改进实践的实施策略。然后进行后续审计,以衡量在遵守最佳做法方面的变化:基线审核对 33 名护士和 90 名护理技术人员以及 10 名胃造口术患者进行了评估。后续审核评估了 37 名护士和 80 名护理技术人员以及 10 名胃造口术患者。后续审核结果显示,在八项标准中,有三项的达标率提高到了 90%。结论:基线审核和反馈策略提高了八项标准中五项的达标率。要保持这些结果,今后的审核是必要的。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gastrostomy management by the nursing team in a hospital in São Paulo, Brazil: a best practice implementation project.

Introduction: The efficient and effective management of gastrostomy patients should be based on best practices.

Objective: This project aimed to improve gastrostomy management in a semi-intensive care unit of a private hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Methods: This study followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. The JBI approach to evidence implementation is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit strategy. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practices against recommended best practices. Feedback from the audit was used to identify barriers and design implement strategies to improve practice. A follow-up audit was then conducted to measure changes in compliance with best practices.

Results: The baseline audit involved an evaluation of 33 nurses and 90 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit evaluated 37 nurses and 80 nursing technicians, as well as 10 gastrostomy patients. The follow-up audit revealed that compliance increased to 90% for three of the eight criteria. For the remainder, it varied between 20% and 50%.

Conclusion: The baseline audit and feedback strategy led to improved compliance in five of the eight criteria. Future audits will be necessary to maintain these results.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A259.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1