Mahmut Yılmaz, Sercan Yılmaz, Hakan Sapmaz, Hülya Şirin, Mete Erdemir, Saadettin Taşlıgil, Gürhan Taşkın, Huseyin L Yamanel
{"title":"能否预测感染 COVID-19 的重症患者的持续性急性肾损伤?","authors":"Mahmut Yılmaz, Sercan Yılmaz, Hakan Sapmaz, Hülya Şirin, Mete Erdemir, Saadettin Taşlıgil, Gürhan Taşkın, Huseyin L Yamanel","doi":"10.3855/jidc.18310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often face a heightened risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly due to complications such as acute kidney injury (AKI). While the persistent acute kidney injury risk index (PARI) has shown promise in predicting the risk of persistent AKI (pAKI) in non-COVID patients, its effectiveness in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains to be explored. We aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the PARI in identifying pAKI and its prognostic significance in terms of clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted at our 36-bed tertiary intensive care unit between April and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 152 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Fifty seven (37.5%) had developed AKI and 16 (10.25%) had developed pAKI. Vasopressor, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and PARI were significantly higher in patients who developed pAKI than those who did not. The PARI were significantly higher in patients with short-term mortality compared to survivors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the PARI score for predicting pAKI was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.79), whereas short-term mortality was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PARI score was evaluated as simple, useful, and reliable in predicting pAKI in severe cases with COVID-19; and therefore, pAKI and its related RRT complications can be prevented with protective interventions. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of this relationship.</p>","PeriodicalId":49160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","volume":"18 8","pages":"1179-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to predict persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection?\",\"authors\":\"Mahmut Yılmaz, Sercan Yılmaz, Hakan Sapmaz, Hülya Şirin, Mete Erdemir, Saadettin Taşlıgil, Gürhan Taşkın, Huseyin L Yamanel\",\"doi\":\"10.3855/jidc.18310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often face a heightened risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly due to complications such as acute kidney injury (AKI). While the persistent acute kidney injury risk index (PARI) has shown promise in predicting the risk of persistent AKI (pAKI) in non-COVID patients, its effectiveness in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains to be explored. We aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the PARI in identifying pAKI and its prognostic significance in terms of clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted at our 36-bed tertiary intensive care unit between April and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 152 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Fifty seven (37.5%) had developed AKI and 16 (10.25%) had developed pAKI. Vasopressor, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and PARI were significantly higher in patients who developed pAKI than those who did not. The PARI were significantly higher in patients with short-term mortality compared to survivors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the PARI score for predicting pAKI was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.79), whereas short-term mortality was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PARI score was evaluated as simple, useful, and reliable in predicting pAKI in severe cases with COVID-19; and therefore, pAKI and its related RRT complications can be prevented with protective interventions. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of this relationship.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"1179-1184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.18310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)重症患者往往面临着更高的发病率和死亡率风险,特别是由于急性肾损伤(AKI)等并发症造成的风险。虽然持续性急性肾损伤风险指数(PARI)在预测非冠状病毒病患者的持续性急性肾损伤(pAKI)风险方面已显示出良好的前景,但其在 COVID-19 重症患者中的有效性仍有待探索。我们的目的是评估 PARI 在识别 pAKI 方面的预测能力及其对临床结果的预后意义:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象是 2020 年 4 月至 12 月期间在我们拥有 36 张病床的三级重症监护病房收治的 COVID-19 患者:共有152名患者符合我们的纳入标准。57例(37.5%)发生了AKI,16例(10.25%)发生了pAKI。发生 pAKI 的患者的血管加压、机械通气和肾脏替代治疗(RRT)需求、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和 PARI 均显著高于未发生 pAKI 的患者。短期死亡患者的 PARI 明显高于存活患者。PARI评分预测pAKI的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(ROC)为0.66(95% CI:0.53-0.79),而短期死亡率为0.733(95% CI:0.65-0.81):PARI评分在预测COVID-19重症病例的pAKI方面被评价为简单、有用且可靠;因此,可以通过保护性干预措施预防pAKI及其相关的RRT并发症。为了加深我们对这种关系的理解,有必要开展进一步的综合研究。
Is it possible to predict persistent acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19 infection?
Introduction: Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often face a heightened risk of morbidity and mortality, particularly due to complications such as acute kidney injury (AKI). While the persistent acute kidney injury risk index (PARI) has shown promise in predicting the risk of persistent AKI (pAKI) in non-COVID patients, its effectiveness in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains to be explored. We aimed to evaluate the predictive power of the PARI in identifying pAKI and its prognostic significance in terms of clinical outcomes.
Methodology: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients with COVID-19 admitted at our 36-bed tertiary intensive care unit between April and December 2020.
Results: There were 152 patients who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Fifty seven (37.5%) had developed AKI and 16 (10.25%) had developed pAKI. Vasopressor, mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (RRT) requirement, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and PARI were significantly higher in patients who developed pAKI than those who did not. The PARI were significantly higher in patients with short-term mortality compared to survivors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the PARI score for predicting pAKI was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.79), whereas short-term mortality was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81).
Conclusions: The PARI score was evaluated as simple, useful, and reliable in predicting pAKI in severe cases with COVID-19; and therefore, pAKI and its related RRT complications can be prevented with protective interventions. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of this relationship.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries (JIDC) is an international journal, intended for the publication of scientific articles from Developing Countries by scientists from Developing Countries.
JIDC is an independent, on-line publication with an international editorial board. JIDC is open access with no cost to view or download articles and reasonable cost for publication of research artcles, making JIDC easily availiable to scientists from resource restricted regions.