支持教师领导力发展的多机构领导圈案例研究。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101290
Kristin K. Janke , Kathryn J. Smith , Michael H. Nelson , Federico Facciolo , Jungeun Lee , Kem P. Krueger , Whitney D. Maxwell , Jennifer D. Robinson
{"title":"支持教师领导力发展的多机构领导圈案例研究。","authors":"Kristin K. Janke ,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Smith ,&nbsp;Michael H. Nelson ,&nbsp;Federico Facciolo ,&nbsp;Jungeun Lee ,&nbsp;Kem P. Krueger ,&nbsp;Whitney D. Maxwell ,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of Leadership Circles (LC), a multi-institutional leadership development program that moves beyond traditional workshops and enables participants to tackle real-world academic leadership challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LC goals included addressing leadership challenges, applying leadership frameworks, providing feedback, seeking advice, and expanding networks. LC participants were recruited from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Leadership Development Special Interest Group and were convened by faculty who had previously participated in an LC. Virtual small group consultations involved rotating assigned roles for each session. To gather observations on the mechanisms that supported LC functioning and outcomes, a case study approach was used, and a formal evaluation was conducted, including 2 focus groups with 6 LC Advisors. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using deductive coding with an established taxonomy to identify outcomes and thematic analysis was used to develop themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six LCs totaling 37 members from 33 institutions met during the 2022–2023 academic year. Sessions involved applying concepts in real, complex, emotionally charged situations, enabling members to share challenges, seek advice and see immediate effects, increasing their investment and the practical application of leadership frameworks (Theme 1). The virtual format fostered relationship building and rapid learning in a cost-effective environment (Theme 2). Members demonstrated vulnerability and sustained commitment at a level that surprised LC Advisors (Theme 3). Cognitive, environmental, relationship and affect outcomes were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LCs were reported as an accessible, engaging, and flexible approach to leadership development. Unanticipated outcomes included the development of supportive and enduring relationships.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"88 11","pages":"Article 101290"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Study of Multi-Institutional Leadership Circles to Support Faculty Leadership Development\",\"authors\":\"Kristin K. Janke ,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Smith ,&nbsp;Michael H. Nelson ,&nbsp;Federico Facciolo ,&nbsp;Jungeun Lee ,&nbsp;Kem P. Krueger ,&nbsp;Whitney D. Maxwell ,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of Leadership Circles (LC), a multi-institutional leadership development program that moves beyond traditional workshops and enables participants to tackle real-world academic leadership challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>LC goals included addressing leadership challenges, applying leadership frameworks, providing feedback, seeking advice, and expanding networks. LC participants were recruited from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Leadership Development Special Interest Group and were convened by faculty who had previously participated in an LC. Virtual small group consultations involved rotating assigned roles for each session. To gather observations on the mechanisms that supported LC functioning and outcomes, a case study approach was used, and a formal evaluation was conducted, including 2 focus groups with 6 LC Advisors. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using deductive coding with an established taxonomy to identify outcomes and thematic analysis was used to develop themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six LCs totaling 37 members from 33 institutions met during the 2022–2023 academic year. Sessions involved applying concepts in real, complex, emotionally charged situations, enabling members to share challenges, seek advice and see immediate effects, increasing their investment and the practical application of leadership frameworks (Theme 1). The virtual format fostered relationship building and rapid learning in a cost-effective environment (Theme 2). Members demonstrated vulnerability and sustained commitment at a level that surprised LC Advisors (Theme 3). Cognitive, environmental, relationship and affect outcomes were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>LCs were reported as an accessible, engaging, and flexible approach to leadership development. Unanticipated outcomes included the development of supportive and enduring relationships.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"88 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 101290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945924110091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的领导力圈(LC)是一个多机构领导力发展项目,它超越了传统的研讨会,使参与者能够应对现实世界中的学术领导力挑战:方法:领导力圈的目标包括应对领导力挑战、应用领导力框架、提供反馈、寻求建议和拓展网络。领导力课程的参与者是从美国学术委员会领导力发展特别兴趣小组中招募的,由曾经参加过领导力课程的教师召集。虚拟小组磋商涉及每个环节的轮流指定角色。为了收集对支持 LC 运作和成果的机制的观察结果,采用了案例研究方法,并进行了正式评估,包括与六位 LC 顾问进行了两次焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论记录采用演绎编码法和既定分类法进行分析,以确定结果,并采用主题分析法确定主题:在 2022-2023 学年期间,共有来自 33 所院校的 37 名成员参加了六个 LC 会议。会议涉及在真实、复杂、情绪化的情况下应用概念,使成员们能够分享挑战、寻求建议并看到立竿见影的效果,从而增加了他们对领导力框架的投入和实际应用(主题 1)。虚拟形式促进了关系的建立,并在具有成本效益的环境中快速学习(专题 2)。成员表现出的脆弱性和持续投入程度令 LC 顾问感到惊讶(主题 3)。结论:据报告,领导力发展中心是领导力发展的一种便捷、吸引人和灵活的方法。意料之外的成果包括发展了相互支持的持久关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Case Study of Multi-Institutional Leadership Circles to Support Faculty Leadership Development

Objective

To explore anticipated and unanticipated outcomes of Leadership Circles (LC), a multi-institutional leadership development program that moves beyond traditional workshops and enables participants to tackle real-world academic leadership challenges.

Methods

LC goals included addressing leadership challenges, applying leadership frameworks, providing feedback, seeking advice, and expanding networks. LC participants were recruited from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Leadership Development Special Interest Group and were convened by faculty who had previously participated in an LC. Virtual small group consultations involved rotating assigned roles for each session. To gather observations on the mechanisms that supported LC functioning and outcomes, a case study approach was used, and a formal evaluation was conducted, including 2 focus groups with 6 LC Advisors. Focus group transcripts were analyzed using deductive coding with an established taxonomy to identify outcomes and thematic analysis was used to develop themes.

Results

Six LCs totaling 37 members from 33 institutions met during the 2022–2023 academic year. Sessions involved applying concepts in real, complex, emotionally charged situations, enabling members to share challenges, seek advice and see immediate effects, increasing their investment and the practical application of leadership frameworks (Theme 1). The virtual format fostered relationship building and rapid learning in a cost-effective environment (Theme 2). Members demonstrated vulnerability and sustained commitment at a level that surprised LC Advisors (Theme 3). Cognitive, environmental, relationship and affect outcomes were identified.

Conclusion

LCs were reported as an accessible, engaging, and flexible approach to leadership development. Unanticipated outcomes included the development of supportive and enduring relationships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Student-Reported Preparedness in Leadership and Professional Service Management Post Capstone Course. A Multisite, Longitudinal Study Assessing Prevalence of Anxiety in Student Pharmacists. Association Of Emotional Intelligence With Pharmacy Students' Leadership And Academic Performance. Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility. Proof of Concept of ChatGPT as a Virtual Tutor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1