埋在沙中的柔性管道在多向运动下的响应:了解断层与管道的相互作用

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108978
{"title":"埋在沙中的柔性管道在多向运动下的响应:了解断层与管道的相互作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Buried pipelines are an integral part of critical lifeline systems, and span across wide geographic areas to convey fluid products for human use. Due to geohazards, pipelines could be subjected to transverse displacements in different directions, i.e., displacements normal to the pipe axis. However, limited experimental studies have been reported on the response of flexible pipes when subjected to such displacements. In this study, fourteen large-scale multi-directional dragging tests were conducted on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes in dry sand to promote a better understanding of flexible pipe-soil interaction. The soil restraint, midspan deflection, circumferential strain, and longitudinal strain are found to increase with the pipe embedment depth and decrease with the loading angle. It is observed that the design guidelines of ALA (2005) largely overestimate the peak soil restraint on PVC pipes subjected to lateral movement, while the yield displacement for PVC pipes is observed to be much greater than the ALA (2005) recommendation. Also, the calculation method of Nyman (1984) is unable to provide close estimations of peak soil restraint on PVC pipes for different loading angles. A new calculation method is proposed, forming a design chart that can accurately predict the peak soil restraint to different movement directions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of flexible pipes buried in sand under multi-directional movement: understanding fault-pipeline interaction\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Buried pipelines are an integral part of critical lifeline systems, and span across wide geographic areas to convey fluid products for human use. Due to geohazards, pipelines could be subjected to transverse displacements in different directions, i.e., displacements normal to the pipe axis. However, limited experimental studies have been reported on the response of flexible pipes when subjected to such displacements. In this study, fourteen large-scale multi-directional dragging tests were conducted on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes in dry sand to promote a better understanding of flexible pipe-soil interaction. The soil restraint, midspan deflection, circumferential strain, and longitudinal strain are found to increase with the pipe embedment depth and decrease with the loading angle. It is observed that the design guidelines of ALA (2005) largely overestimate the peak soil restraint on PVC pipes subjected to lateral movement, while the yield displacement for PVC pipes is observed to be much greater than the ALA (2005) recommendation. Also, the calculation method of Nyman (1984) is unable to provide close estimations of peak soil restraint on PVC pipes for different loading angles. A new calculation method is proposed, forming a design chart that can accurately predict the peak soil restraint to different movement directions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026772612400530X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026772612400530X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埋地管道是重要生命线系统不可或缺的一部分,它横跨广阔的地域,输送供人类使用的流体产品。由于地质灾害,管道可能会受到不同方向的横向位移,即管道轴线法线方向的位移。然而,关于柔性管道在受到这种位移时的响应的实验研究报告却很有限。在本研究中,为了更好地了解柔性管道与土壤的相互作用,对干燥沙土中的聚氯乙烯(PVC)管道进行了 14 次大规模多方向拖曳试验。试验发现,土壤约束、中跨挠度、圆周应变和纵向应变随管道埋入深度的增加而增加,随加载角度的增加而减小。据观察,ALA(2005 年)的设计指南在很大程度上高估了 PVC 管道在横向移动时的土壤约束峰值,而据观察,PVC 管道的屈服位移远大于 ALA(2005 年)的建议值。此外,Nyman(1984)的计算方法也无法对不同加载角度下 PVC 管材的土壤约束峰值进行精确估算。本文提出了一种新的计算方法,形成了一个设计图表,可以准确预测不同运动方向的土壤约束峰值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of flexible pipes buried in sand under multi-directional movement: understanding fault-pipeline interaction
Buried pipelines are an integral part of critical lifeline systems, and span across wide geographic areas to convey fluid products for human use. Due to geohazards, pipelines could be subjected to transverse displacements in different directions, i.e., displacements normal to the pipe axis. However, limited experimental studies have been reported on the response of flexible pipes when subjected to such displacements. In this study, fourteen large-scale multi-directional dragging tests were conducted on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes in dry sand to promote a better understanding of flexible pipe-soil interaction. The soil restraint, midspan deflection, circumferential strain, and longitudinal strain are found to increase with the pipe embedment depth and decrease with the loading angle. It is observed that the design guidelines of ALA (2005) largely overestimate the peak soil restraint on PVC pipes subjected to lateral movement, while the yield displacement for PVC pipes is observed to be much greater than the ALA (2005) recommendation. Also, the calculation method of Nyman (1984) is unable to provide close estimations of peak soil restraint on PVC pipes for different loading angles. A new calculation method is proposed, forming a design chart that can accurately predict the peak soil restraint to different movement directions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Study on deformation patterns of tunnel isolation layers and seismic response of a shield tunnel A method to truncate elastic half-plane for soil–structure interaction analysis under moving loads and its implementation to ABAQUS High robust eddy current tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters for structures under the ground acceleration Simplified site response analysis for regional seismic risk assessments Long-term effect of soil settlement on lateral dynamic responses of end-bearing friction pile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1