主要是妇女问题"--印度城市社区对非政府组织防止暴力侵害妇女大型计划的反应存在性别差异

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102997
Sukanya Paradkar , Chatush Singh , Anand Suryavanshi , Apurva Tiwari , Beniamino Cislaghi , Nayreen Daruwalla , David Osrin , Lu Gram
{"title":"主要是妇女问题\"--印度城市社区对非政府组织防止暴力侵害妇女大型计划的反应存在性别差异","authors":"Sukanya Paradkar ,&nbsp;Chatush Singh ,&nbsp;Anand Suryavanshi ,&nbsp;Apurva Tiwari ,&nbsp;Beniamino Cislaghi ,&nbsp;Nayreen Daruwalla ,&nbsp;David Osrin ,&nbsp;Lu Gram","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite striking gender differences in men's and women's engagement in past prevention programmes to stop violence against women (VAW), few empirical studies have determined why such gender differences arise. We did a grounded theory study of a large-scale NGO programme in informal settlements in Mumbai, India, aiming to analyse how gender affects participation in community action to address VAW. We did 27 focus group discussions and 31 semi-structured interviews with 77 women and 36 men, as well as with 9 NGO staff. We supplemented qualitative data with quantitative monitoring data on referrals to NGO counselling centres. We found that male participants in the NGO programme not only reported violence to the NGO at lower rates but took less intensive action to support survivors. When they did engage, they more often defended perpetrators or asked survivors to accommodate them than female participants. These differences could be explained by a greater (1) affective response to VAW (2) perceived stake in addressing VAW (3) sense of empowerment from taking action, and (4) perceived NGO support for self among women compared to men. Differences were evident even between male and female participants who had taken part in NGO activities for years. We theorise that these differences ultimately stem from men and women's structurally different position in a gender unequal society. Our findings identify key motivational barriers to address to improve the effectiveness of programmes to prevent VAW. Given the greater barriers to men's community action compared to women's community action, it may be useful to recognize the value of prevention programmes with differing levels of male engagement, including women-only programmes and programmes in which male community participants play a secondary role and are not expected to be as active as female participants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102997"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Mostly women's issues’ – Gender differences in community responses to a large-scale NGO programme to prevent violence against women in urban India\",\"authors\":\"Sukanya Paradkar ,&nbsp;Chatush Singh ,&nbsp;Anand Suryavanshi ,&nbsp;Apurva Tiwari ,&nbsp;Beniamino Cislaghi ,&nbsp;Nayreen Daruwalla ,&nbsp;David Osrin ,&nbsp;Lu Gram\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102997\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Despite striking gender differences in men's and women's engagement in past prevention programmes to stop violence against women (VAW), few empirical studies have determined why such gender differences arise. We did a grounded theory study of a large-scale NGO programme in informal settlements in Mumbai, India, aiming to analyse how gender affects participation in community action to address VAW. We did 27 focus group discussions and 31 semi-structured interviews with 77 women and 36 men, as well as with 9 NGO staff. We supplemented qualitative data with quantitative monitoring data on referrals to NGO counselling centres. We found that male participants in the NGO programme not only reported violence to the NGO at lower rates but took less intensive action to support survivors. When they did engage, they more often defended perpetrators or asked survivors to accommodate them than female participants. These differences could be explained by a greater (1) affective response to VAW (2) perceived stake in addressing VAW (3) sense of empowerment from taking action, and (4) perceived NGO support for self among women compared to men. Differences were evident even between male and female participants who had taken part in NGO activities for years. We theorise that these differences ultimately stem from men and women's structurally different position in a gender unequal society. Our findings identify key motivational barriers to address to improve the effectiveness of programmes to prevent VAW. Given the greater barriers to men's community action compared to women's community action, it may be useful to recognize the value of prevention programmes with differing levels of male engagement, including women-only programmes and programmes in which male community participants play a secondary role and are not expected to be as active as female participants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Womens Studies International Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524001353\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539524001353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在过去为制止对妇女的暴力行为(VAW)而开展的预防计划中,男性和女性的参与程度存在明显的性别差异,但很少有实证研究能够确定这种性别差异产生的原因。我们对印度孟买非正规居住区的一项大型非政府组织计划进行了基础理论研究,旨在分析性别如何影响参与社区行动以解决暴力侵害妇女问题。我们与 77 名女性和 36 名男性以及 9 名非政府组织工作人员进行了 27 次焦点小组讨论和 31 次半结构式访谈。我们用非政府组织咨询中心转介情况的定量监测数据对定性数据进行了补充。我们发现,非政府组织计划的男性参与者不仅向非政府组织报告暴力事件的比例较低,而且采取的支持幸存者的行动也较少。与女性参与者相比,他们在参与时更多地为施暴者辩护或要求幸存者迁就他们。这些差异的原因可能是:(1)对暴力侵害妇女行为的情感反应;(2)在处理暴力侵害妇女行为中的利益感;(3)采取行动的授权感;(4)与男性相比,女性认为非政府组织对自己的支持更大。即使是参加非政府组织活动多年的男性和女性参与者之间也存在明显差异。我们推断,这些差异最终源于男女在性别不平等社会中的不同地位。我们的研究结果指出了为提高预防暴力侵害妇女计划的有效性而需要解决的主要动机障碍。与女性社区行动相比,男性社区行动面临着更大的障碍,因此,认识到男性参与程度不同的预防计划的价值可能是有益的,这些计划包括只针对女性的计划,以及男性社区参与者在其中扮演次要角色、不像女性参与者那样积极的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Mostly women's issues’ – Gender differences in community responses to a large-scale NGO programme to prevent violence against women in urban India
Despite striking gender differences in men's and women's engagement in past prevention programmes to stop violence against women (VAW), few empirical studies have determined why such gender differences arise. We did a grounded theory study of a large-scale NGO programme in informal settlements in Mumbai, India, aiming to analyse how gender affects participation in community action to address VAW. We did 27 focus group discussions and 31 semi-structured interviews with 77 women and 36 men, as well as with 9 NGO staff. We supplemented qualitative data with quantitative monitoring data on referrals to NGO counselling centres. We found that male participants in the NGO programme not only reported violence to the NGO at lower rates but took less intensive action to support survivors. When they did engage, they more often defended perpetrators or asked survivors to accommodate them than female participants. These differences could be explained by a greater (1) affective response to VAW (2) perceived stake in addressing VAW (3) sense of empowerment from taking action, and (4) perceived NGO support for self among women compared to men. Differences were evident even between male and female participants who had taken part in NGO activities for years. We theorise that these differences ultimately stem from men and women's structurally different position in a gender unequal society. Our findings identify key motivational barriers to address to improve the effectiveness of programmes to prevent VAW. Given the greater barriers to men's community action compared to women's community action, it may be useful to recognize the value of prevention programmes with differing levels of male engagement, including women-only programmes and programmes in which male community participants play a secondary role and are not expected to be as active as female participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Challenging the status quo: A feminist analysis of gender dynamics, motivation, and empowerment in hackathons Thirty years of gender mainstreaming: Evolution, development, and future research agenda through a bibliometric approach How the online presence of mothers changed over time during the COVID pandemic: A longitudinal study Anti-genderism in Turkey: Masculinist entrenchment through cultural intimacies Montenegrin gender ‘protections’ and the limits of gender equality laws
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1