政治极化与州政府债券

IF 5.5 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Global Finance Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101039
Pei Li , Leo Tang , C. Bryan Cloyd
{"title":"政治极化与州政府债券","authors":"Pei Li ,&nbsp;Leo Tang ,&nbsp;C. Bryan Cloyd","doi":"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effect of political polarization in state legislatures on state bond yields in the United States. Political polarization, defined as the ideological divide between Democratic and Republican members of the state legislative chambers, reflects legislators' willingness to seek bipartisan compromises. We expect high polarization states to be riskier because they are likelier to experience gridlock, negatively affecting economic development and debt service commitment. Findings suggest a significant positive relation between bond yields and political polarization. A one-standard-deviation increase in polarization increases bond yields by 7.81 basis points and total interest expense by $2.3 million for an average bond issue. Additionally, this study finds that the effect of polarization on bond yields is stronger for general obligation bonds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46907,"journal":{"name":"Global Finance Journal","volume":"63 ","pages":"Article 101039"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political polarization and state government bonds\",\"authors\":\"Pei Li ,&nbsp;Leo Tang ,&nbsp;C. Bryan Cloyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gfj.2024.101039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the effect of political polarization in state legislatures on state bond yields in the United States. Political polarization, defined as the ideological divide between Democratic and Republican members of the state legislative chambers, reflects legislators' willingness to seek bipartisan compromises. We expect high polarization states to be riskier because they are likelier to experience gridlock, negatively affecting economic development and debt service commitment. Findings suggest a significant positive relation between bond yields and political polarization. A one-standard-deviation increase in polarization increases bond yields by 7.81 basis points and total interest expense by $2.3 million for an average bond issue. Additionally, this study finds that the effect of polarization on bond yields is stronger for general obligation bonds.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"volume\":\"63 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104402832400111X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104402832400111X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了美国州议会中的政治两极化对州债券收益率的影响。政治两极分化是指州立法院民主党和共和党议员之间的意识形态分歧,它反映了立法者寻求两党妥协的意愿。我们预计两极分化严重的州风险更大,因为它们更容易陷入僵局,对经济发展和偿债承诺产生负面影响。研究结果表明,债券收益率与政治极化之间存在显著的正相关关系。两极分化每增加一个标准差,债券收益率就会增加 7.81 个基点,平均发行债券的总利息支出就会增加 230 万美元。此外,本研究还发现,两极分化对债券收益率的影响对一般义务债券更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political polarization and state government bonds
This study examines the effect of political polarization in state legislatures on state bond yields in the United States. Political polarization, defined as the ideological divide between Democratic and Republican members of the state legislative chambers, reflects legislators' willingness to seek bipartisan compromises. We expect high polarization states to be riskier because they are likelier to experience gridlock, negatively affecting economic development and debt service commitment. Findings suggest a significant positive relation between bond yields and political polarization. A one-standard-deviation increase in polarization increases bond yields by 7.81 basis points and total interest expense by $2.3 million for an average bond issue. Additionally, this study finds that the effect of polarization on bond yields is stronger for general obligation bonds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Finance Journal
Global Finance Journal BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
13.50%
发文量
106
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Global Finance Journal provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and techniques among academicians and practitioners and, thereby, advances applied research in global financial management. Global Finance Journal publishes original, creative, scholarly research that integrates theory and practice and addresses a readership in both business and academia. Articles reflecting pragmatic research are sought in areas such as financial management, investment, banking and financial services, accounting, and taxation. Global Finance Journal welcomes contributions from scholars in both the business and academic community and encourages collaborative research from this broad base worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Pyramidal structure, vertical interlock, and corporate innovation Inhabiting influence of digital finance on stock price synchronicity Business group heterogeneity and firm outcomes: Evidence from Korean chaebols Under the microscope: Trade initiation activities around earnings and takeover announcements in a market with continuous disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1