使用相关方法对变量选择进行分析:在建模过程中重视统计推断的方法

IF 2.6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecological Modelling Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110893
Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo , Alexander Peña-Peniche , Claudio Mota-Vargas , Javier Piña-Torres , Daniel Valencia-Rodríguez , Coral E. Rangel-Rivera , Juliana Gaviria-Hernández , Octavio Rojas-Soto
{"title":"使用相关方法对变量选择进行分析:在建模过程中重视统计推断的方法","authors":"Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo ,&nbsp;Alexander Peña-Peniche ,&nbsp;Claudio Mota-Vargas ,&nbsp;Javier Piña-Torres ,&nbsp;Daniel Valencia-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Coral E. Rangel-Rivera ,&nbsp;Juliana Gaviria-Hernández ,&nbsp;Octavio Rojas-Soto","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selecting the best set of variables in ecological niche models (ENM) and species distribution models (SDM) has become a topic of interest in correlative models, leading to the use of statistical methods to estimate the relationships between variables. However, selecting sets of variables requires several decisions, such as choosing sources of information (i.e., species records and calibration areas) and statistical methods to optimize the modelling process while preventing the overestimation of parameters. In the present study, we analyzed four scenarios for selecting variables in ENM/SDM, including the implication of using the Pearson and Spearman correlation methods, with two strategies to extract the variables' information: species records and calibration areas. First, we conducted a bibliographic review to determine the most used methods to select variables. 134 of the 150 articles selected applied correlation methods, 47 used Pearson and 18 Spearman, and the remaining 69 did not specify the type of correlation method. Also, 19 articles employed species records, 20 used calibration areas, and 95 did not specify how they selected variables, showing the absence of clarity and consistency in variables selection. Then, we explored the same four combinations for 56 bird species. We conducted normality tests for the variables per species and found a tendency for non-normal distributions. Furthermore, we performed Pearson and Spearman correlations using species records and calibration areas as extraction strategies and discussed the differences between each one. Finally, we built different sets of variables and performance SDM for six species and found that the set of variables selected has a different composition based on their strategy. Our findings highlight the absence of clarity and consistency in describing correlation coefficients commonly used for environmental variable selection and emphasize its significant implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51043,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Modelling","volume":"498 ","pages":"Article 110893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses of the variable selection using correlation methods: An approach to the importance of statistical inferences in the modelling process\",\"authors\":\"Mauricio Díaz-Vallejo ,&nbsp;Alexander Peña-Peniche ,&nbsp;Claudio Mota-Vargas ,&nbsp;Javier Piña-Torres ,&nbsp;Daniel Valencia-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Coral E. Rangel-Rivera ,&nbsp;Juliana Gaviria-Hernández ,&nbsp;Octavio Rojas-Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2024.110893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Selecting the best set of variables in ecological niche models (ENM) and species distribution models (SDM) has become a topic of interest in correlative models, leading to the use of statistical methods to estimate the relationships between variables. However, selecting sets of variables requires several decisions, such as choosing sources of information (i.e., species records and calibration areas) and statistical methods to optimize the modelling process while preventing the overestimation of parameters. In the present study, we analyzed four scenarios for selecting variables in ENM/SDM, including the implication of using the Pearson and Spearman correlation methods, with two strategies to extract the variables' information: species records and calibration areas. First, we conducted a bibliographic review to determine the most used methods to select variables. 134 of the 150 articles selected applied correlation methods, 47 used Pearson and 18 Spearman, and the remaining 69 did not specify the type of correlation method. Also, 19 articles employed species records, 20 used calibration areas, and 95 did not specify how they selected variables, showing the absence of clarity and consistency in variables selection. Then, we explored the same four combinations for 56 bird species. We conducted normality tests for the variables per species and found a tendency for non-normal distributions. Furthermore, we performed Pearson and Spearman correlations using species records and calibration areas as extraction strategies and discussed the differences between each one. Finally, we built different sets of variables and performance SDM for six species and found that the set of variables selected has a different composition based on their strategy. Our findings highlight the absence of clarity and consistency in describing correlation coefficients commonly used for environmental variable selection and emphasize its significant implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"volume\":\"498 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110893\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002813\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380024002813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在生态位模型(ENM)和物种分布模型(SDM)中选择最佳的变量集已成为相关模型的一个关注主题,从而导致使用统计方法来估计变量之间的关系。然而,变量集的选择需要几个决策,如选择信息来源(即物种记录和校准区域)和统计方法,以优化建模过程,同时防止参数被高估。在本研究中,我们分析了 ENM/SDM 中选择变量的四种方案,包括使用皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼相关方法的影响,以及提取变量信息的两种策略:物种记录和校准区域。首先,我们进行了文献综述,以确定最常用的变量选择方法。所选的 150 篇文章中有 134 篇采用了相关方法,其中 47 篇采用了皮尔逊法,18 篇采用了斯皮尔曼法,其余 69 篇没有说明相关方法的类型。此外,19 篇文章采用了物种记录,20 篇文章采用了校准区域,95 篇文章没有说明如何选择变量,这表明变量选择缺乏明确性和一致性。然后,我们对 56 种鸟类进行了同样的四种组合研究。我们对每个物种的变量进行了正态性检验,发现存在非正态分布的趋势。此外,我们还使用物种记录和校准区域作为提取策略,进行了皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼相关性分析,并讨论了每种策略之间的差异。最后,我们为六个物种建立了不同的变量集和性能 SDM,并发现根据不同的策略,所选择的变量集具有不同的构成。我们的发现凸显了环境变量选择常用的相关系数描述缺乏清晰性和一致性,并强调了其重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyses of the variable selection using correlation methods: An approach to the importance of statistical inferences in the modelling process
Selecting the best set of variables in ecological niche models (ENM) and species distribution models (SDM) has become a topic of interest in correlative models, leading to the use of statistical methods to estimate the relationships between variables. However, selecting sets of variables requires several decisions, such as choosing sources of information (i.e., species records and calibration areas) and statistical methods to optimize the modelling process while preventing the overestimation of parameters. In the present study, we analyzed four scenarios for selecting variables in ENM/SDM, including the implication of using the Pearson and Spearman correlation methods, with two strategies to extract the variables' information: species records and calibration areas. First, we conducted a bibliographic review to determine the most used methods to select variables. 134 of the 150 articles selected applied correlation methods, 47 used Pearson and 18 Spearman, and the remaining 69 did not specify the type of correlation method. Also, 19 articles employed species records, 20 used calibration areas, and 95 did not specify how they selected variables, showing the absence of clarity and consistency in variables selection. Then, we explored the same four combinations for 56 bird species. We conducted normality tests for the variables per species and found a tendency for non-normal distributions. Furthermore, we performed Pearson and Spearman correlations using species records and calibration areas as extraction strategies and discussed the differences between each one. Finally, we built different sets of variables and performance SDM for six species and found that the set of variables selected has a different composition based on their strategy. Our findings highlight the absence of clarity and consistency in describing correlation coefficients commonly used for environmental variable selection and emphasize its significant implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Modelling
Ecological Modelling 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
259
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with the use of mathematical models and systems analysis for the description of ecological processes and for the sustainable management of resources. Human activity and well-being are dependent on and integrated with the functioning of ecosystems and the services they provide. We aim to understand these basic ecosystem functions using mathematical and conceptual modelling, systems analysis, thermodynamics, computer simulations, and ecological theory. This leads to a preference for process-based models embedded in theory with explicit causative agents as opposed to strictly statistical or correlative descriptions. These modelling methods can be applied to a wide spectrum of issues ranging from basic ecology to human ecology to socio-ecological systems. The journal welcomes research articles, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other communications. The journal also supports the activities of the [International Society of Ecological Modelling (ISEM)](http://www.isemna.org/).
期刊最新文献
Research on Accounting for the Value of Forest Ecological Products in Qilian Mountain National Park in Gansu Province Ecological network analysis for urban physical-virtual water cycle: A case study of Beijing Impact of environmental conditions on fish early-life stages, an individual-based model approach Variability in habitat selection between herds for a widespread ungulate Permafrost environment evaluation of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau based on DPSRC theory and system dynamics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1