{"title":"节能低碳反应蒸馏工艺在酯交换制碳酸二甲酯过程中的动力学启示","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transesterification of propylene carbonate (PC) or ethylene carbonate (EC) to dimethyl carbonate (DMC) by using catalytic reactive distillation (RD) is a promising approach for carbon dioxide utilization. However, there is still scarcity of comprehensive comparison between the two RD processes. Hence, using the UNIQUAC model and kinetics calibrated by literature and our experiments, we conduct an extensive comparison of the two RD processes. Based on the kinetic insights, laboratory RD processes for both reactions are modeled, analyzed, and experimentally validated. Consequently, two RD processes designed to produce 60 ktpy of DMC are optimized and compared. The interplay and control factors between reaction and separation are elucidated and clarified via investigating variations of the actual chemical equilibrium constant profile compared with theoretical values along the reactive section at various pressures, liquid holdups, etc. The results reveal that the optimized EC RD process achieves almost 50 % reductions in both total annual cost and carbon dioxide emission compared to the PC RD process. This work facilitates the carbon neutrality and provides an essential guide for quantitatively assessing the two routes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinetic insights into energy-saving and low-carbon reactive distillation processes for the transesterification to dimethyl carbonate\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seppur.2024.129745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The transesterification of propylene carbonate (PC) or ethylene carbonate (EC) to dimethyl carbonate (DMC) by using catalytic reactive distillation (RD) is a promising approach for carbon dioxide utilization. However, there is still scarcity of comprehensive comparison between the two RD processes. Hence, using the UNIQUAC model and kinetics calibrated by literature and our experiments, we conduct an extensive comparison of the two RD processes. Based on the kinetic insights, laboratory RD processes for both reactions are modeled, analyzed, and experimentally validated. Consequently, two RD processes designed to produce 60 ktpy of DMC are optimized and compared. The interplay and control factors between reaction and separation are elucidated and clarified via investigating variations of the actual chemical equilibrium constant profile compared with theoretical values along the reactive section at various pressures, liquid holdups, etc. The results reveal that the optimized EC RD process achieves almost 50 % reductions in both total annual cost and carbon dioxide emission compared to the PC RD process. This work facilitates the carbon neutrality and provides an essential guide for quantitatively assessing the two routes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Separation and Purification Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586624034841\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383586624034841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kinetic insights into energy-saving and low-carbon reactive distillation processes for the transesterification to dimethyl carbonate
The transesterification of propylene carbonate (PC) or ethylene carbonate (EC) to dimethyl carbonate (DMC) by using catalytic reactive distillation (RD) is a promising approach for carbon dioxide utilization. However, there is still scarcity of comprehensive comparison between the two RD processes. Hence, using the UNIQUAC model and kinetics calibrated by literature and our experiments, we conduct an extensive comparison of the two RD processes. Based on the kinetic insights, laboratory RD processes for both reactions are modeled, analyzed, and experimentally validated. Consequently, two RD processes designed to produce 60 ktpy of DMC are optimized and compared. The interplay and control factors between reaction and separation are elucidated and clarified via investigating variations of the actual chemical equilibrium constant profile compared with theoretical values along the reactive section at various pressures, liquid holdups, etc. The results reveal that the optimized EC RD process achieves almost 50 % reductions in both total annual cost and carbon dioxide emission compared to the PC RD process. This work facilitates the carbon neutrality and provides an essential guide for quantitatively assessing the two routes.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.