将 Estimand 框架应用于群组内试验 (TwiCs) 研究的定制指南

{"title":"将 Estimand 框架应用于群组内试验 (TwiCs) 研究的定制指南","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><strong>Objective</strong>: The estimand framework offers a structured approach to define the treatment effect to be estimated in a clinical study. Defining the estimand upfront helps formulating the research question and informs study design, data collection and statistical analysis methods. Since the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design has unique characteristics, the objective of this study is to describe considerations and provide guidance for formulating estimands for TwiCs studies.</div><div><strong>Methods</strong>: The key attributes of an estimand are the target population, treatments that are compared, the endpoint, intercurrent events and their handling, and the population-level summary measure. The estimand framework was applied retrospectively to two TwiCs studies: the SPONGE and UMBRELLA Fit trial. The aim is to demonstrate how the estimand framework can be implemented in TwiCs studies, thereby focusing on considerations relevant for defining the estimand. Three estimands were defined for both studies. For the SPONGE trial, estimators were derived.</div><div><strong>Results</strong>: Intercurrent events considered to occur exclusively or more frequently in TwiCs studies compared to conventional randomized trials included intervention refusal after randomization, misalignment of timing of routine cohort measurements and the intervention period, and participants in the control arm initiating treatments similar to the studied intervention. Considerations for handling refusal after randomization related to decisions on whether the target population should include all eligible participants or the subpopulation that would accept (or undergo) the intervention when offered. Considerations for handling treatment initiation in the control arm and misalignments of timing related to decisions on whether such events should be considered part of treatment policy or whether interest is in a hypothetical scenario where such events do not occur.</div><div><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The TwiCs study design has unique features that pose specific considerations when formulating an estimand. The examples in this study can provide guidance in the definition of estimands in future TwiCs studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><strong>Objective</strong>: The estimand framework offers a structured approach to define the treatment effect to be estimated in a clinical study. Defining the estimand upfront helps formulating the research question and informs study design, data collection and statistical analysis methods. Since the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design has unique characteristics, the objective of this study is to describe considerations and provide guidance for formulating estimands for TwiCs studies.</div><div><strong>Methods</strong>: The key attributes of an estimand are the target population, treatments that are compared, the endpoint, intercurrent events and their handling, and the population-level summary measure. The estimand framework was applied retrospectively to two TwiCs studies: the SPONGE and UMBRELLA Fit trial. The aim is to demonstrate how the estimand framework can be implemented in TwiCs studies, thereby focusing on considerations relevant for defining the estimand. Three estimands were defined for both studies. For the SPONGE trial, estimators were derived.</div><div><strong>Results</strong>: Intercurrent events considered to occur exclusively or more frequently in TwiCs studies compared to conventional randomized trials included intervention refusal after randomization, misalignment of timing of routine cohort measurements and the intervention period, and participants in the control arm initiating treatments similar to the studied intervention. Considerations for handling refusal after randomization related to decisions on whether the target population should include all eligible participants or the subpopulation that would accept (or undergo) the intervention when offered. Considerations for handling treatment initiation in the control arm and misalignments of timing related to decisions on whether such events should be considered part of treatment policy or whether interest is in a hypothetical scenario where such events do not occur.</div><div><strong>Conclusion</strong>: The TwiCs study design has unique features that pose specific considerations when formulating an estimand. The examples in this study can provide guidance in the definition of estimands in future TwiCs studies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113324000294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113324000294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:估算指标框架提供了一种结构化方法,用于定义临床研究中需要估算的治疗效果。预先定义估计指标有助于提出研究问题,并为研究设计、数据收集和统计分析方法提供依据。由于群组内试验(TwiCs)设计有其独特性,本研究的目的是描述TwiCs研究中的注意事项,并为制定估计指标提供指导:估算指标的关键属性包括目标人群、比较的治疗方法、终点、并发症及其处理以及人群水平的总结测量。对两项TwiCs研究--SPONGE和UMBRELLA Fit试验--回顾性地应用了估计值框架。目的是展示如何在TwiCs研究中实施估计指标框架,从而重点关注与定义估计指标相关的注意事项。两项研究都定义了三个估计指标。结果:与传统随机试验相比,TwiCs 研究中被认为是唯一或更频繁发生的并发症包括:随机化后拒绝干预、常规队列测量时间与干预期不一致、对照组参与者开始接受与所研究干预类似的治疗。处理随机化后拒绝干预的考虑因素与目标人群是否应包括所有符合条件的参与者或提供干预后会接受(或进行)干预的亚人群有关。考虑如何处理对照组的治疗启动和时间错位问题,这涉及到是否应将此类事件视为治疗政策的一部分,或者是否应关注不发生此类事件的假设情况:TwiCs 研究设计有其独特之处,在制定估计值时需要特别考虑。本研究中的例子可为今后的TwiCs研究中估算指标的定义提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies
Objective: The estimand framework offers a structured approach to define the treatment effect to be estimated in a clinical study. Defining the estimand upfront helps formulating the research question and informs study design, data collection and statistical analysis methods. Since the Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) design has unique characteristics, the objective of this study is to describe considerations and provide guidance for formulating estimands for TwiCs studies.
Methods: The key attributes of an estimand are the target population, treatments that are compared, the endpoint, intercurrent events and their handling, and the population-level summary measure. The estimand framework was applied retrospectively to two TwiCs studies: the SPONGE and UMBRELLA Fit trial. The aim is to demonstrate how the estimand framework can be implemented in TwiCs studies, thereby focusing on considerations relevant for defining the estimand. Three estimands were defined for both studies. For the SPONGE trial, estimators were derived.
Results: Intercurrent events considered to occur exclusively or more frequently in TwiCs studies compared to conventional randomized trials included intervention refusal after randomization, misalignment of timing of routine cohort measurements and the intervention period, and participants in the control arm initiating treatments similar to the studied intervention. Considerations for handling refusal after randomization related to decisions on whether the target population should include all eligible participants or the subpopulation that would accept (or undergo) the intervention when offered. Considerations for handling treatment initiation in the control arm and misalignments of timing related to decisions on whether such events should be considered part of treatment policy or whether interest is in a hypothetical scenario where such events do not occur.
Conclusion: The TwiCs study design has unique features that pose specific considerations when formulating an estimand. The examples in this study can provide guidance in the definition of estimands in future TwiCs studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Epidemiology
Global Epidemiology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
39 days
期刊最新文献
A note on handling conditional missing values Tailored guidance to apply the Estimand framework to Trials within Cohorts (TwiCs) studies Improving the timeliness of birth registration in Fiji through a financial incentive Predicting adolescent psychopathology from early life factors: A machine learning tutorial Challenging unverified assumptions in causal claims: Do gas stoves increase risk of pediatric asthma?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1