韩国一家三级医院门诊患者的口服抗生素处方及其适宜性。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.009
S M Shin, Y Lee, E Heo, H-S Kim, Y M Jeong, J Lee, E E Lee, J-Y Lee, Y Choi, S J Choi, S M Moon, K-H Song, H B Kim, E S Kim
{"title":"韩国一家三级医院门诊患者的口服抗生素处方及其适宜性。","authors":"S M Shin, Y Lee, E Heo, H-S Kim, Y M Jeong, J Lee, E E Lee, J-Y Lee, Y Choi, S J Choi, S M Moon, K-H Song, H B Kim, E S Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have gained prominence, with increased awareness regarding the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. However, ASP implementation for outpatient antibiotic prescription is uncommon, particularly in South Korea. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescription at a tertiary care hospital in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed the patterns of oral antibiotic prescription between 1<sup>st</sup> June 2018 and 31<sup>st</sup> May 2023 at the outpatient department of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The appropriateness of prescriptions issued between 15<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> May 2023 was assessed. The assessment criteria included: indication for antibiotic use; antibiotic choice; duration; and dose/frequency. Pharmacists and infectious diseases specialists performed evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7,282,407 outpatient visits were recorded over the 5-year study period, and oral antibiotics were prescribed in 243,967 (3.4%) cases. The frequency of antibiotic prescription was highest in dentistry, dermatology and urology departments. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cephalosporins, penicillins and sulphonamides. Of the 423 prescriptions evaluated, 289 (68.3%) and 134 (31.7%) were for treatment and prophylaxis, respectively. Prescriptions were classified as inappropriate in 28.4% (82/289) and 70.9% (95/134) of treatment and prophylaxis cases, respectively. The primary reason for inappropriateness in both treatment and prophylaxis cases was inappropriate indication, accounting for 46.3% (38/82) of treatment prescriptions and 96.8% (92/95) of prophylaxis prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotics were prescribed at 3.4% of all outpatient visits. The prescription was inappropriate in 28.4% of treatment cases and 70.9% of prophylactic cases. Proactive and expansive ASP activities by pharmacists should be considered in outpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescription of oral antibiotics and its appropriateness for outpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"S M Shin, Y Lee, E Heo, H-S Kim, Y M Jeong, J Lee, E E Lee, J-Y Lee, Y Choi, S J Choi, S M Moon, K-H Song, H B Kim, E S Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have gained prominence, with increased awareness regarding the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. However, ASP implementation for outpatient antibiotic prescription is uncommon, particularly in South Korea. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescription at a tertiary care hospital in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analysed the patterns of oral antibiotic prescription between 1<sup>st</sup> June 2018 and 31<sup>st</sup> May 2023 at the outpatient department of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The appropriateness of prescriptions issued between 15<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> May 2023 was assessed. The assessment criteria included: indication for antibiotic use; antibiotic choice; duration; and dose/frequency. Pharmacists and infectious diseases specialists performed evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7,282,407 outpatient visits were recorded over the 5-year study period, and oral antibiotics were prescribed in 243,967 (3.4%) cases. The frequency of antibiotic prescription was highest in dentistry, dermatology and urology departments. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cephalosporins, penicillins and sulphonamides. Of the 423 prescriptions evaluated, 289 (68.3%) and 134 (31.7%) were for treatment and prophylaxis, respectively. Prescriptions were classified as inappropriate in 28.4% (82/289) and 70.9% (95/134) of treatment and prophylaxis cases, respectively. The primary reason for inappropriateness in both treatment and prophylaxis cases was inappropriate indication, accounting for 46.3% (38/82) of treatment prescriptions and 96.8% (92/95) of prophylaxis prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotics were prescribed at 3.4% of all outpatient visits. The prescription was inappropriate in 28.4% of treatment cases and 70.9% of prophylactic cases. Proactive and expansive ASP activities by pharmacists should be considered in outpatient settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2024.09.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着人们对合理使用抗生素的重要性认识的提高,抗菌药物管理计划(ASPs)的重要性日益突出。然而,在门诊抗生素处方中实施 ASP 的情况并不多见,尤其是在韩国。本研究旨在分析韩国一家三级医院门诊抗生素处方的模式和合理性:我们分析了 2018 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间首尔国立大学盆唐医院门诊部口服抗生素处方的模式。对2023年5月15日至5月19日期间开具的处方进行了适宜性评估。评估标准包括:抗生素使用指征、抗生素选择、持续时间、剂量和频率。药剂师和传染病专家进行了评估:结果:5 年内共记录了 7,282,407 次门诊就诊。其中 243,967 人(3.4%)被处方口服抗生素。牙科、皮肤科和泌尿科处方抗生素的频率最高。最常处方的抗生素是头孢菌素类、青霉素类和磺胺类。在评估的 423 份处方中,289 份(68.3%)和 134 份(31.7%)分别用于治疗和预防。在治疗和预防处方中,分别有 28.4%(82/289)和 70.9%(95/134)的处方被发现不恰当。治疗和预防用药不足的主要原因是适应症不当,占治疗处方的 46.3%(38/82)和预防处方的 96.8%(92/95):结论:3.4%的门诊病人使用了抗生素,其中28.4%的治疗性抗生素和70.9%的预防性抗生素处方不当。药剂师应考虑在门诊环境中开展积极主动的 ASP 活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescription of oral antibiotics and its appropriateness for outpatients in a tertiary care hospital in Korea.

Objectives: Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) have gained prominence, with increased awareness regarding the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. However, ASP implementation for outpatient antibiotic prescription is uncommon, particularly in South Korea. This study aimed to analyse the patterns and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescription at a tertiary care hospital in Korea.

Methods: This study analysed the patterns of oral antibiotic prescription between 1st June 2018 and 31st May 2023 at the outpatient department of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. The appropriateness of prescriptions issued between 15th and 19th May 2023 was assessed. The assessment criteria included: indication for antibiotic use; antibiotic choice; duration; and dose/frequency. Pharmacists and infectious diseases specialists performed evaluations.

Results: In total, 7,282,407 outpatient visits were recorded over the 5-year study period, and oral antibiotics were prescribed in 243,967 (3.4%) cases. The frequency of antibiotic prescription was highest in dentistry, dermatology and urology departments. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were cephalosporins, penicillins and sulphonamides. Of the 423 prescriptions evaluated, 289 (68.3%) and 134 (31.7%) were for treatment and prophylaxis, respectively. Prescriptions were classified as inappropriate in 28.4% (82/289) and 70.9% (95/134) of treatment and prophylaxis cases, respectively. The primary reason for inappropriateness in both treatment and prophylaxis cases was inappropriate indication, accounting for 46.3% (38/82) of treatment prescriptions and 96.8% (92/95) of prophylaxis prescriptions.

Conclusions: Antibiotics were prescribed at 3.4% of all outpatient visits. The prescription was inappropriate in 28.4% of treatment cases and 70.9% of prophylactic cases. Proactive and expansive ASP activities by pharmacists should be considered in outpatient settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1