放射组学模型在预测脑小血管疾病患者不同程度认知障碍方面的诊断效果差异。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING BMC Medical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s12880-024-01431-0
Bingqin Huang, Wei Zheng, Ronghua Mu, Peng Yang, Xin Li, Fuzhen Liu, Xiaoyan Qin, Xiqi Zhu
{"title":"放射组学模型在预测脑小血管疾病患者不同程度认知障碍方面的诊断效果差异。","authors":"Bingqin Huang, Wei Zheng, Ronghua Mu, Peng Yang, Xin Li, Fuzhen Liu, Xiaoyan Qin, Xiqi Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01431-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aim to validate the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models for predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were divided into mild cognitive impairment group (mild-CSVD group) and sever cognitive impairment group (sever-CSVD group) according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance, 98 gender-age-education matched subjects served as normal controls. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented hippocampus using PyRadiomics. The feature preprocessing involved replacing missing values with the mean, applying stratified random sampling to allocate subjects into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, ensuring balance among the three classes (normal controls, mild-CSVD group, and sever-CSVD group). A feature selection method was applied to identify discriminative radiomic features, with the optimal texture feature chosen for developing diagnostic models. Performance was evaluated in both the training and testing sets using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiomics model achieved an accuracy of 0.625, an AUC of 0.593, a sensitivity of 0.828, and a specificity of 0.316 in distinguishing mild-CSVD group from normal controls. When distinguishing mild-CSVD group from sever-CSVD group, the radiomics model reached an accuracy of 0.683, an AUC of 0.660, a sensitivity of 0.167, and a specificity of 0.897. Similarly, in distinguishing sever-CSVD group from normal controls, the radiomics model exhibited an accuracy of 0.781, an AUC of 0.818, a sensitivity of 0.538, and a specificity of 0.947.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics model based on hippocampal texture had disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with CSVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease.\",\"authors\":\"Bingqin Huang, Wei Zheng, Ronghua Mu, Peng Yang, Xin Li, Fuzhen Liu, Xiaoyan Qin, Xiqi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12880-024-01431-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aim to validate the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models for predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were divided into mild cognitive impairment group (mild-CSVD group) and sever cognitive impairment group (sever-CSVD group) according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance, 98 gender-age-education matched subjects served as normal controls. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented hippocampus using PyRadiomics. The feature preprocessing involved replacing missing values with the mean, applying stratified random sampling to allocate subjects into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, ensuring balance among the three classes (normal controls, mild-CSVD group, and sever-CSVD group). A feature selection method was applied to identify discriminative radiomic features, with the optimal texture feature chosen for developing diagnostic models. Performance was evaluated in both the training and testing sets using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiomics model achieved an accuracy of 0.625, an AUC of 0.593, a sensitivity of 0.828, and a specificity of 0.316 in distinguishing mild-CSVD group from normal controls. When distinguishing mild-CSVD group from sever-CSVD group, the radiomics model reached an accuracy of 0.683, an AUC of 0.660, a sensitivity of 0.167, and a specificity of 0.897. Similarly, in distinguishing sever-CSVD group from normal controls, the radiomics model exhibited an accuracy of 0.781, an AUC of 0.818, a sensitivity of 0.538, and a specificity of 0.947.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics model based on hippocampal texture had disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with CSVD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01431-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01431-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:旨在验证放射组学模型对预测脑小血管疾病(CSVD)患者不同程度认知障碍的诊断效果:目的:验证放射组学模型预测脑小血管疾病(CSVD)患者不同程度认知功能障碍的诊断效果:根据蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)结果,将参与者分为轻度认知障碍组(mild-CSVD组)和重度认知障碍组(severe-CSVD组),98名性别-年龄-教育匹配的受试者作为正常对照。使用 PyRadiomics 从分割的海马中提取放射组学特征。特征预处理包括用平均值替换缺失值,应用分层随机抽样将受试者分为训练集(80%)和测试集(20%),确保三个类别(正常对照组、轻度-CSVD 组和重度-CSVD 组)之间的平衡。采用特征选择方法来识别具有鉴别力的放射学特征,并选择最佳纹理特征来开发诊断模型。利用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析评估了训练集和测试集的性能:放射组学模型在区分轻度 CSVD 组和正常对照组方面的准确率为 0.625,AUC 为 0.593,灵敏度为 0.828,特异性为 0.316。在区分轻度-CSVD 组和严重-CSVD 组时,放射组学模型的准确度为 0.683,AUC 为 0.660,灵敏度为 0.167,特异度为 0.897。同样,在区分严重-CSVD 组和正常对照组时,放射组学模型的准确度为 0.781,AUC 为 0.818,灵敏度为 0.538,特异度为 0.947:基于海马纹理的放射组学模型在预测CSVD患者不同程度的认知功能障碍方面的诊断效果存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease.

Background: Aim to validate the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models for predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD).

Methods: Participants were divided into mild cognitive impairment group (mild-CSVD group) and sever cognitive impairment group (sever-CSVD group) according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) performance, 98 gender-age-education matched subjects served as normal controls. Radiomic features were extracted from the segmented hippocampus using PyRadiomics. The feature preprocessing involved replacing missing values with the mean, applying stratified random sampling to allocate subjects into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, ensuring balance among the three classes (normal controls, mild-CSVD group, and sever-CSVD group). A feature selection method was applied to identify discriminative radiomic features, with the optimal texture feature chosen for developing diagnostic models. Performance was evaluated in both the training and testing sets using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: The radiomics model achieved an accuracy of 0.625, an AUC of 0.593, a sensitivity of 0.828, and a specificity of 0.316 in distinguishing mild-CSVD group from normal controls. When distinguishing mild-CSVD group from sever-CSVD group, the radiomics model reached an accuracy of 0.683, an AUC of 0.660, a sensitivity of 0.167, and a specificity of 0.897. Similarly, in distinguishing sever-CSVD group from normal controls, the radiomics model exhibited an accuracy of 0.781, an AUC of 0.818, a sensitivity of 0.538, and a specificity of 0.947.

Conclusion: Radiomics model based on hippocampal texture had disparities in the diagnostic efficacy of radiomics models in predicting various degrees of cognitive impairment in patients with CSVD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
期刊最新文献
In vitro detection of cancer cells using a novel fluorescent choline derivative. Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced esophageal cancer by a clinical-deep learning radiomics model : Prediction of esophageal fistula in radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy patients. Prior information guided deep-learning model for tumor bed segmentation in breast cancer radiotherapy. The predictive value of nomogram for adnexal cystic-solid masses based on O-RADS US, clinical and laboratory indicators. The study on ultrasound image classification using a dual-branch model based on Resnet50 guided by U-net segmentation results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1