基于机器学习的颈椎板层成形术后门诊随访计划优化模型。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y
Yechan Seo, Seoi Jeong, Siyoung Lee, Tae-Shin Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, John M Rhee, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Chi Heon Kim
{"title":"基于机器学习的颈椎板层成形术后门诊随访计划优化模型。","authors":"Yechan Seo, Seoi Jeong, Siyoung Lee, Tae-Shin Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, John M Rhee, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Chi Heon Kim","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergo regular clinical follow-up after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. However, those whose symptoms significantly improve and remain stable do not need to conform to a regular follow-up schedule. Based on the 1-year postoperative outcomes, we aimed to use a machine-learning (ML) algorithm to predict 2-year postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 80 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. The patients' Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (range: 0-17) were analyzed at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative timepoints to evaluate their ability to predict the 2-year postoperative outcomes. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was defined as a JOA score ≥ 14.25 at 24 months postoperatively and, based on clinical outcomes recorded up to the 1-year postoperative timepoint, eight ML algorithms were developed to predict PASS status at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. The performance of each of these algorithms was evaluated, and its generalizability was assessed using a prospective internal test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The long short-term memory (LSTM)-based algorithm demonstrated the best performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90 ± 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LSTM-based algorithm accurately predicted which group was likely to achieve PASS at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. Although this study included a small number of patients with limited available clinical data, the concept of using past outcomes to predict further outcomes presented herein may provide insights for optimizing clinical schedules and efficient medical resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered as a clinical trial (Clinical Trial No. NCT02487901), and the study protocol was approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 1505-037-670).</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"278"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning-based models for the optimization of post-cervical spinal laminoplasty outpatient follow-up schedules.\",\"authors\":\"Yechan Seo, Seoi Jeong, Siyoung Lee, Tae-Shin Kim, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chun Kee Chung, Chang-Hyun Lee, John M Rhee, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Chi Heon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergo regular clinical follow-up after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. However, those whose symptoms significantly improve and remain stable do not need to conform to a regular follow-up schedule. Based on the 1-year postoperative outcomes, we aimed to use a machine-learning (ML) algorithm to predict 2-year postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 80 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. The patients' Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (range: 0-17) were analyzed at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative timepoints to evaluate their ability to predict the 2-year postoperative outcomes. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was defined as a JOA score ≥ 14.25 at 24 months postoperatively and, based on clinical outcomes recorded up to the 1-year postoperative timepoint, eight ML algorithms were developed to predict PASS status at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. The performance of each of these algorithms was evaluated, and its generalizability was assessed using a prospective internal test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The long short-term memory (LSTM)-based algorithm demonstrated the best performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90 ± 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LSTM-based algorithm accurately predicted which group was likely to achieve PASS at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. Although this study included a small number of patients with limited available clinical data, the concept of using past outcomes to predict further outcomes presented herein may provide insights for optimizing clinical schedules and efficient medical resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered as a clinical trial (Clinical Trial No. NCT02487901), and the study protocol was approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 1505-037-670).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"278\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11440713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02693-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈椎脊髓病的椎板成形术后,患者需要定期接受临床随访。然而,那些症状明显改善并保持稳定的患者并不需要遵守定期随访计划。基于术后 1 年的结果,我们旨在使用机器学习(ML)算法预测术后 2 年的结果:我们招募了 80 名因颈椎病接受颈椎板成形术的患者。在术后 1、3、6 和 12 个月的时间点对患者的日本骨科协会(JOA)评分(范围:0-17)进行分析,以评估其预测术后 2 年疗效的能力。患者可接受的症状状态(PASS)定义为术后 24 个月时 JOA 评分≥ 14.25,根据术后 1 年时间点之前记录的临床结果,开发了八种 ML 算法来预测术后 24 个月时间点的 PASS 状态。对每种算法的性能进行了评估,并使用前瞻性内部测试集对其通用性进行了评估:结果:基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的算法表现最佳(接收器工作特征曲线下面积为 0.90 ± 0.13):基于长短期记忆(LSTM)的算法准确预测了哪一组患者有可能在术后 24 个月的时间点达到 PASS。虽然这项研究涉及的患者人数较少,可用的临床数据有限,但本文提出的利用过去的结果预测未来结果的概念可能会为优化临床计划和有效利用医疗资源提供启示:本研究已注册为临床试验(临床试验编号:NCT02487901),研究方案已获得首尔国立大学医院机构审查委员会批准(IRB 编号:1505-037-670)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine-learning-based models for the optimization of post-cervical spinal laminoplasty outpatient follow-up schedules.

Background: Patients undergo regular clinical follow-up after laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. However, those whose symptoms significantly improve and remain stable do not need to conform to a regular follow-up schedule. Based on the 1-year postoperative outcomes, we aimed to use a machine-learning (ML) algorithm to predict 2-year postoperative outcomes.

Methods: We enrolled 80 patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. The patients' Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores (range: 0-17) were analyzed at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative timepoints to evaluate their ability to predict the 2-year postoperative outcomes. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was defined as a JOA score ≥ 14.25 at 24 months postoperatively and, based on clinical outcomes recorded up to the 1-year postoperative timepoint, eight ML algorithms were developed to predict PASS status at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. The performance of each of these algorithms was evaluated, and its generalizability was assessed using a prospective internal test set.

Results: The long short-term memory (LSTM)-based algorithm demonstrated the best performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.90 ± 0.13).

Conclusions: The LSTM-based algorithm accurately predicted which group was likely to achieve PASS at the 24-month postoperative timepoint. Although this study included a small number of patients with limited available clinical data, the concept of using past outcomes to predict further outcomes presented herein may provide insights for optimizing clinical schedules and efficient medical resource utilization.

Trial registration: This study was registered as a clinical trial (Clinical Trial No. NCT02487901), and the study protocol was approved by the Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 1505-037-670).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UK. Development and validation of a rheumatoid arthritis case definition: a machine learning approach using data from primary care electronic medical records. Machine learning predicts pulmonary Long Covid sequelae using clinical data. Natural language processing data services for healthcare providers. Prediction model of ICU readmission in Chinese patients with acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1