Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz
{"title":"临床三维超声系统的超声定位显微精度。","authors":"Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz","doi":"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":13322,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Precision of Clinical 3D Ultrasound Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Precision of Clinical 3D Ultrasound Systems.
Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control includes the theory, technology, materials, and applications relating to: (1) the generation, transmission, and detection of ultrasonic waves and related phenomena; (2) medical ultrasound, including hyperthermia, bioeffects, tissue characterization and imaging; (3) ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and piezomagnetic materials, including crystals, polycrystalline solids, films, polymers, and composites; (4) frequency control, timing and time distribution, including crystal oscillators and other means of classical frequency control, and atomic, molecular and laser frequency control standards. Areas of interest range from fundamental studies to the design and/or applications of devices and systems.