临床三维超声系统的超声定位显微精度。

Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz
{"title":"临床三维超声系统的超声定位显微精度。","authors":"Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz","doi":"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":13322,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Precision of Clinical 3D Ultrasound Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Stefanie Dencks, Thomas Lisson, Nico Oblisz, Fabian Kiessling, Georg Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3467391","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超声定位显微技术在临床前应用中已日趋成熟。要将其应用于临床实践,商用超声扫描仪所能达到的定位精度至关重要--尤其是容积成像,这对于处理平面外运动至关重要。在此,我们提出了一种易于操作的方法来估算三维超声扫描仪的定位精度。利用这种方法,我们评估了飞利浦 Epiq 7 超声设备使用 X5-1 和 XL14-3 矩阵换能器的成像序列,并测试了不同的定位方法。对于 X5-1 换能器,一种对比模式的最佳横向、仰角和轴向精度分别为 109 μm、95 μm 和 55 μm,另一种对比模式的最佳横向、仰角和轴向精度分别为 29 μm、22 μm 和 19 μm。频率较高的 XL14-3 传感器使用谐波成像模式的精确度分别为 17 μm、38 μm 和 6 μm。虽然质量中心是最稳健的定位方法,也往往能提供最佳精度,但与成像序列和换能器的影响相比,定位方法对定位精度的影响微乎其微。结果表明,使用 X5-1 传感器的一种成像模式,可以达到与 XL14-3 传感器相当的精度。然而,由于定位精度低于 10 μm,因此无法重建毛细血管层面的微血管。这些结果表明,在使用不同超声换能器或扫描仪的成像序列进行体内测量之前,对其在各个方向的定位精度进行评估非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Precision of Clinical 3D Ultrasound Systems.

Ultrasound localization microscopy is becoming well established in preclinical applications. For its translation into clinical practice, the localization precision achievable with commercial ultrasound scanners is crucial - especially with volume imaging, which is essential for dealing with out-of-plane motion. Here, we propose an easy-to-perform method to estimate the localization precision of 3D ultrasound scanners. With this method, we evaluated imaging sequences of the Philips Epiq 7 ultrasound device using the X5-1 and the XL14-3 matrix transducers, and also tested different localization methods. For the X5-1 transducer, the best lateral, elevational, and axial precision was 109 μm, 95 μm, and 55 μm for one contrast mode, and 29 μm, 22 μm, and 19 μm for the other. The higher frequency XL14-3 transducer yielded precisions of 17 μm, 38 μm, and 6 μm using the harmonic imaging mode. Although the center of mass was the most robust localization method also often providing the best precision, the localization method has only minor influence on the localization precision compared to the impact by the imaging sequence and transducer. The results show that with one of the imaging modes of the X5-1 transducer, precisions comparable to the XL14-3 transducer can be achieved. However, due to localization precisions worse than 10 μm, reconstruction of the microvasculature at the capillary level will not be possible. These results show the importance to evaluate the localization precision of imaging sequences from different ultrasound transducers or scanners in all directions before using them for in vivo measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
583
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control includes the theory, technology, materials, and applications relating to: (1) the generation, transmission, and detection of ultrasonic waves and related phenomena; (2) medical ultrasound, including hyperthermia, bioeffects, tissue characterization and imaging; (3) ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and piezomagnetic materials, including crystals, polycrystalline solids, films, polymers, and composites; (4) frequency control, timing and time distribution, including crystal oscillators and other means of classical frequency control, and atomic, molecular and laser frequency control standards. Areas of interest range from fundamental studies to the design and/or applications of devices and systems.
期刊最新文献
TinyProbe: A Wearable 32-channel Multi-Modal Wireless Ultrasound Probe. LSMD: Long-Short Memory-Based Detection Network for Carotid Artery Detection in B-mode Ultrasound Video Streams. A Phantom-Free Approach for Estimating the Backscatter Coefficient of Aggregated Red Blood Cells applied to COVID-19 Patients. High-frequency wearable ultrasound array belt for small animal echocardiography. Deep Power-aware Tunable Weighting for Ultrasound Microvascular Imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1