植入式下腔静脉传感器用于精确容量评估的安全性和可行性:FUTURE-HF2 试验。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2024-09-28 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.09.003
Nir Uriel, Kunjan Bhatt, Rami Kahwash, Thomas R McMinn, Manesh R Patel, Scott Lilly, John R Britton, Louise Corcoran, Barry R Greene, Robyn M Kealy, Annette Kent, William S Sheridan, Ajay J Kirtane, Sanjum S Sethi, Jeremiah P Depta, Scott C Feitell, Gabriel Sayer, Marat Fudim
{"title":"植入式下腔静脉传感器用于精确容量评估的安全性和可行性:FUTURE-HF2 试验。","authors":"Nir Uriel, Kunjan Bhatt, Rami Kahwash, Thomas R McMinn, Manesh R Patel, Scott Lilly, John R Britton, Louise Corcoran, Barry R Greene, Robyn M Kealy, Annette Kent, William S Sheridan, Ajay J Kirtane, Sanjum S Sethi, Jeremiah P Depta, Scott C Feitell, Gabriel Sayer, Marat Fudim","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel implantable sensor has been designed to measure the inferior vena cava (IVC) area accurately so as to allow daily monitoring of the IVC area and collapse to predict congestion in heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, Early Feasibility Study enrolled 15 patients with HF (irrespective of ejection fraction) and with an HF event in the previous 12 months, an elevated NT-proBNP level, and receiving ≥ 40 mg of furosemide equivalent. Primary endpoints included successful deployment without procedure-related (30 days) or sensor-related complications (3 months) and successful data transmission to a secure database (3 months). Accuracy of sensor-derived IVC area, patient adherence, NYHA classification, and KCCQ were assessed from baseline to 3 months. Patient-specific signal alterations were correlated with clinical presentation to guide interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients underwent implantation: 66 ± 12 years; 47% female; 27% with HFpEF, NT-ProBNP levels 2569 (median, IQR: 1674-5187, ng/L; 87% NYHA class III). All patients met the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. Sensor-derived IVC areas showed excellent agreement with concurrent computed tomography (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99, mean absolute error = 11.15 mm<sup>2</sup>). Median adherence to daily readings was 98% (IQR: 86%-100%) per patient-month. A significant improvement was seen in NYHA class and a nonsignificant improvement was observed in KCCQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implantation of a novel IVC sensor (FIRE1) was feasible, uncomplicated and safe. Sensor outputs aligned with clinical presentations and improvements in clinical outcomes. Future investigation to establish the IVC sensor remote management of HF is strongly warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Feasibility of an Implanted Inferior Vena Cava Sensor for Accurate Volume Assessment: FUTURE-HF2 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nir Uriel, Kunjan Bhatt, Rami Kahwash, Thomas R McMinn, Manesh R Patel, Scott Lilly, John R Britton, Louise Corcoran, Barry R Greene, Robyn M Kealy, Annette Kent, William S Sheridan, Ajay J Kirtane, Sanjum S Sethi, Jeremiah P Depta, Scott C Feitell, Gabriel Sayer, Marat Fudim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A novel implantable sensor has been designed to measure the inferior vena cava (IVC) area accurately so as to allow daily monitoring of the IVC area and collapse to predict congestion in heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, Early Feasibility Study enrolled 15 patients with HF (irrespective of ejection fraction) and with an HF event in the previous 12 months, an elevated NT-proBNP level, and receiving ≥ 40 mg of furosemide equivalent. Primary endpoints included successful deployment without procedure-related (30 days) or sensor-related complications (3 months) and successful data transmission to a secure database (3 months). Accuracy of sensor-derived IVC area, patient adherence, NYHA classification, and KCCQ were assessed from baseline to 3 months. Patient-specific signal alterations were correlated with clinical presentation to guide interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients underwent implantation: 66 ± 12 years; 47% female; 27% with HFpEF, NT-ProBNP levels 2569 (median, IQR: 1674-5187, ng/L; 87% NYHA class III). All patients met the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. Sensor-derived IVC areas showed excellent agreement with concurrent computed tomography (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99, mean absolute error = 11.15 mm<sup>2</sup>). Median adherence to daily readings was 98% (IQR: 86%-100%) per patient-month. A significant improvement was seen in NYHA class and a nonsignificant improvement was observed in KCCQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implantation of a novel IVC sensor (FIRE1) was feasible, uncomplicated and safe. Sensor outputs aligned with clinical presentations and improvements in clinical outcomes. Future investigation to establish the IVC sensor remote management of HF is strongly warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiac Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:设计了一种新型植入式传感器来精确测量下腔静脉(IVC)面积,以便每天监测IVC面积和塌陷情况,预测心力衰竭(HF)的充血情况:一项前瞻性、多中心、单臂、早期可行性研究招募了 15 名在过去 12 个月内发生过心衰事件、NT-proBNP 升高、服用呋塞米等效剂量≥40 毫克的心衰患者(不考虑射血分数)。主要终点包括成功部署,无手术相关并发症(30 天)或传感器相关并发症(3 个月),以及成功将数据传输到安全数据库(3 个月)。从基线到三个月期间,对传感器得出的 IVC 面积、患者依从性、NYHA 分级和 KCCQ 的准确性进行了评估。患者特异性信号改变与临床表现相关联,以指导干预措施:15 名患者接受了植入手术(66±12 岁;47% 女性;27% HFpEF,NT-ProBNP 2569(中位数,IQR:(1674-5187) ng/L;87% NYHA III 级)。所有患者均达到了主要安全性和有效性终点。传感器得出的 IVC 面积与同时进行的 CT 显示出极好的一致性(R2=0.99,平均绝对误差=11.15 mm2)。患者月每日读数的坚持率中位数为 98%(IQR:86-100%)。NYHA分级有明显改善,KCCQ无明显改善:结论:植入新型 IVC 传感器 (FIRE1) 是可行、简便和安全的。传感器的输出结果与临床表现和临床结果的改善相一致。今后,有必要对 IVC 传感器对高血压的远程管理进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Feasibility of an Implanted Inferior Vena Cava Sensor for Accurate Volume Assessment: FUTURE-HF2 Trial.

Background: A novel implantable sensor has been designed to measure the inferior vena cava (IVC) area accurately so as to allow daily monitoring of the IVC area and collapse to predict congestion in heart failure (HF).

Methods: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, Early Feasibility Study enrolled 15 patients with HF (irrespective of ejection fraction) and with an HF event in the previous 12 months, an elevated NT-proBNP level, and receiving ≥ 40 mg of furosemide equivalent. Primary endpoints included successful deployment without procedure-related (30 days) or sensor-related complications (3 months) and successful data transmission to a secure database (3 months). Accuracy of sensor-derived IVC area, patient adherence, NYHA classification, and KCCQ were assessed from baseline to 3 months. Patient-specific signal alterations were correlated with clinical presentation to guide interventions.

Results: Fifteen patients underwent implantation: 66 ± 12 years; 47% female; 27% with HFpEF, NT-ProBNP levels 2569 (median, IQR: 1674-5187, ng/L; 87% NYHA class III). All patients met the primary safety and effectiveness endpoints. Sensor-derived IVC areas showed excellent agreement with concurrent computed tomography (R2 = 0.99, mean absolute error = 11.15 mm2). Median adherence to daily readings was 98% (IQR: 86%-100%) per patient-month. A significant improvement was seen in NYHA class and a nonsignificant improvement was observed in KCCQ.

Conclusions: Implantation of a novel IVC sensor (FIRE1) was feasible, uncomplicated and safe. Sensor outputs aligned with clinical presentations and improvements in clinical outcomes. Future investigation to establish the IVC sensor remote management of HF is strongly warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic utility and cutoff differences of NT-proBNP level across subgroups in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry. Psychosocial Risk to Predict Outcomes after LVAD implantation: A small step forward in predicting human behavior. Editorial: Unlocking the Prognostic Potential: The Quest for Optimal Right Ventricular Parameters in LVAD Recipients. Patient-Centered Research Design to Increase Representativeness of Diverse Populations in Clinical Trials. cDPP3 in Cardiogenic Shock: More than just a prognostic marker?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1