介绍 "三先生":数字和颜色单词学习中的注意、感知和意义选择》。

Q1 Social Sciences Open Mind Pub Date : 2024-09-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00163
Katharine A Tillman, Katie Wagner, David Barner
{"title":"介绍 \"三先生\":数字和颜色单词学习中的注意、感知和意义选择》。","authors":"Katharine A Tillman, Katie Wagner, David Barner","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children learn their first number words gradually over the course of many months, which is surprising given their ability to discriminate small numerosities. One potential explanation for this is that children are sensitive to the numerical features of stimuli, but don't consider exact cardinality as a primary hypothesis for novel word meanings. To test this, we trained 144 children on a number word they hadn't yet learned, and contrasted this with a condition in which they were merely required to attend to number to identify the word's referent, without encoding number as its meaning. In the first condition, children were trained to find a \"giraffe with three spots.\" In the second condition, children were instead trained to find \"Mr. Three\", which also named a giraffe with three spots. In both conditions, children had to attend to number to identify the target giraffe, but, because proper nouns refer to individuals rather than their properties, the second condition did not require children to encode number as the meaning of the expression. We found that children were significantly better at identifying the giraffe when it had been labeled with the proper noun than with the number word. This finding contrasted with a second experiment involving color words, in which children (<i>n</i> = 56) were equally successful with a proper noun (\"Mr. Purple\") and an adjective (\"the giraffe with purple spots\"). Together, these findings suggest that, for number, but not for color, children's difficulty acquiring new words cannot be solely attributed to problems with attention or perception, but instead may be due to difficulty selecting the correct meaning from their hypothesis space for learning unknown words.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"8 ","pages":"1129-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing Mr. Three: Attention, Perception, and Meaning Selection in the Acquisition of Number and Color Words.\",\"authors\":\"Katharine A Tillman, Katie Wagner, David Barner\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/opmi_a_00163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children learn their first number words gradually over the course of many months, which is surprising given their ability to discriminate small numerosities. One potential explanation for this is that children are sensitive to the numerical features of stimuli, but don't consider exact cardinality as a primary hypothesis for novel word meanings. To test this, we trained 144 children on a number word they hadn't yet learned, and contrasted this with a condition in which they were merely required to attend to number to identify the word's referent, without encoding number as its meaning. In the first condition, children were trained to find a \\\"giraffe with three spots.\\\" In the second condition, children were instead trained to find \\\"Mr. Three\\\", which also named a giraffe with three spots. In both conditions, children had to attend to number to identify the target giraffe, but, because proper nouns refer to individuals rather than their properties, the second condition did not require children to encode number as the meaning of the expression. We found that children were significantly better at identifying the giraffe when it had been labeled with the proper noun than with the number word. This finding contrasted with a second experiment involving color words, in which children (<i>n</i> = 56) were equally successful with a proper noun (\\\"Mr. Purple\\\") and an adjective (\\\"the giraffe with purple spots\\\"). Together, these findings suggest that, for number, but not for color, children's difficulty acquiring new words cannot be solely attributed to problems with attention or perception, but instead may be due to difficulty selecting the correct meaning from their hypothesis space for learning unknown words.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Mind\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"1129-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11441787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Mind\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童是在几个月的时间里逐渐学会第一个数字单词的,鉴于他们对小数字的辨别能力,这一点令人惊讶。一种可能的解释是,儿童对刺激物的数字特征很敏感,但他们并不把精确的数字个数作为新词义的主要假设。为了验证这一点,我们对 144 名儿童进行了他们尚未学会的数字单词的训练,并将其与只要求他们注意数字以识别单词所指,而不将数字作为其含义的条件进行了对比。在第一种情况下,训练儿童找到 "有三个斑点的长颈鹿"。在第二种情况下,训练儿童找到 "三先生",这也是指有三个斑点的长颈鹿。在这两种条件下,儿童都必须注意数字来识别目标长颈鹿,但由于专有名词指的是个体而非其属性,因此第二种条件并不要求儿童将数字编码为表达的含义。我们发现,当长颈鹿被贴上专有名词标签时,儿童识别长颈鹿的能力明显强于数字标签。这一结果与第二个涉及颜色词的实验形成了鲜明对比,在该实验中,儿童(n = 56)在使用专有名词("紫色先生")和形容词("长颈鹿身上有紫色斑点")时同样成功。这些发现共同表明,对于数字而非颜色,儿童学习新单词的困难不能完全归咎于注意力或感知问题,而可能是由于他们在学习未知单词的假设空间中难以选择正确的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introducing Mr. Three: Attention, Perception, and Meaning Selection in the Acquisition of Number and Color Words.

Children learn their first number words gradually over the course of many months, which is surprising given their ability to discriminate small numerosities. One potential explanation for this is that children are sensitive to the numerical features of stimuli, but don't consider exact cardinality as a primary hypothesis for novel word meanings. To test this, we trained 144 children on a number word they hadn't yet learned, and contrasted this with a condition in which they were merely required to attend to number to identify the word's referent, without encoding number as its meaning. In the first condition, children were trained to find a "giraffe with three spots." In the second condition, children were instead trained to find "Mr. Three", which also named a giraffe with three spots. In both conditions, children had to attend to number to identify the target giraffe, but, because proper nouns refer to individuals rather than their properties, the second condition did not require children to encode number as the meaning of the expression. We found that children were significantly better at identifying the giraffe when it had been labeled with the proper noun than with the number word. This finding contrasted with a second experiment involving color words, in which children (n = 56) were equally successful with a proper noun ("Mr. Purple") and an adjective ("the giraffe with purple spots"). Together, these findings suggest that, for number, but not for color, children's difficulty acquiring new words cannot be solely attributed to problems with attention or perception, but instead may be due to difficulty selecting the correct meaning from their hypothesis space for learning unknown words.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Approximating Human-Level 3D Visual Inferences With Deep Neural Networks. Prosodic Cues Support Inferences About the Question's Pedagogical Intent. The Double Standard of Ownership. Combination and Differentiation Theories of Categorization: A Comparison Using Participants' Categorization Descriptions. Investigating Sensitivity to Shared Information and Personal Experience in Children's Use of Majority Information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1