基于 ChatGPT 的逻辑学习中的流程及其对英语议论文写作中逻辑和自我效能的影响

IF 9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-24 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2024.108457
Ruofei Zhang , Di Zou , Gary Cheng , Haoran Xie
{"title":"基于 ChatGPT 的逻辑学习中的流程及其对英语议论文写作中逻辑和自我效能的影响","authors":"Ruofei Zhang ,&nbsp;Di Zou ,&nbsp;Gary Cheng ,&nbsp;Haoran Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Flow is a state of full engagement in an activity. Learning environments featured by Skill-challenge balance, Clear goal, Feedback, and Playability — collectively known as flow antecedents – can induce flow experiences and improve learning outcomes. ChatGPT-based environment seems to encourage a flow in learners: By customising tasks to match students' abilities, aligning materials with clear objectives, providing instant feedback, and ensuring ease of use, ChatGPT can help learners enter a flow state, which, in turn, leads to improved learning. However, there hasn't been much research on flow in ChatGPT-based learning. To bridge the gap, we developed a ChatGPT-based environment for developing logic in English argumentative writing. We studied 40 Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students in the learning using questionnaires, eye-tracking data, knowledge tests, essay writing tasks, and semi-structured interviews to understand how they experienced flow and how it affected their learning. Our findings showed that the ChatGPT-based environment strongly supports flow antecedents. Skill-challenge balance and Playability were particularly influential for inducing flow experiences. Students who experienced a deeper flow showed better understanding of argumentative writing logic, although their writing self-efficacy became lower. Drawing from the findings, our study highlights how AI like ChatGPT can influence experiences and outcomes of logic learning and language learning, which may be applicable across various domains and disciplines.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108457"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing\",\"authors\":\"Ruofei Zhang ,&nbsp;Di Zou ,&nbsp;Gary Cheng ,&nbsp;Haoran Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Flow is a state of full engagement in an activity. Learning environments featured by Skill-challenge balance, Clear goal, Feedback, and Playability — collectively known as flow antecedents – can induce flow experiences and improve learning outcomes. ChatGPT-based environment seems to encourage a flow in learners: By customising tasks to match students' abilities, aligning materials with clear objectives, providing instant feedback, and ensuring ease of use, ChatGPT can help learners enter a flow state, which, in turn, leads to improved learning. However, there hasn't been much research on flow in ChatGPT-based learning. To bridge the gap, we developed a ChatGPT-based environment for developing logic in English argumentative writing. We studied 40 Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students in the learning using questionnaires, eye-tracking data, knowledge tests, essay writing tasks, and semi-structured interviews to understand how they experienced flow and how it affected their learning. Our findings showed that the ChatGPT-based environment strongly supports flow antecedents. Skill-challenge balance and Playability were particularly influential for inducing flow experiences. Students who experienced a deeper flow showed better understanding of argumentative writing logic, although their writing self-efficacy became lower. Drawing from the findings, our study highlights how AI like ChatGPT can influence experiences and outcomes of logic learning and language learning, which may be applicable across various domains and disciplines.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322400325X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322400325X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流动是一种全身心投入活动的状态。以技能-挑战平衡、明确目标、反馈和可玩性为特征的学习环境--统称为 "流 "的先决条件--可以诱发 "流 "的体验并提高学习效果。基于 ChatGPT 的环境似乎能激发学习者的流动体验:通过定制符合学生能力的任务、根据明确的目标调整材料、提供即时反馈以及确保易用性,ChatGPT 可以帮助学习者进入流动状态,进而提高学习效果。然而,关于基于 ChatGPT 的学习中的流状态的研究还不多。为了弥补这一差距,我们开发了一个基于 ChatGPT 的环境,用于培养英语议论文写作的逻辑性。我们通过问卷调查、眼动跟踪数据、知识测试、论文写作任务和半结构化访谈,对 40 名中国大学英语作为外语(EFL)的学生进行了研究,以了解他们如何体验流以及流如何影响他们的学习。我们的研究结果表明,基于 ChatGPT 的环境有力地支持了 "流 "的前因。技能-挑战平衡和可玩性对诱发流动体验尤其有影响。虽然写作自我效能感降低了,但体验到更深流动体验的学生对议论文写作逻辑有了更好的理解。根据研究结果,我们的研究强调了像 ChatGPT 这样的人工智能如何影响逻辑学习和语言学习的体验和结果,这可能适用于各个领域和学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flow in ChatGPT-based logic learning and its influences on logic and self-efficacy in English argumentative writing
Flow is a state of full engagement in an activity. Learning environments featured by Skill-challenge balance, Clear goal, Feedback, and Playability — collectively known as flow antecedents – can induce flow experiences and improve learning outcomes. ChatGPT-based environment seems to encourage a flow in learners: By customising tasks to match students' abilities, aligning materials with clear objectives, providing instant feedback, and ensuring ease of use, ChatGPT can help learners enter a flow state, which, in turn, leads to improved learning. However, there hasn't been much research on flow in ChatGPT-based learning. To bridge the gap, we developed a ChatGPT-based environment for developing logic in English argumentative writing. We studied 40 Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) students in the learning using questionnaires, eye-tracking data, knowledge tests, essay writing tasks, and semi-structured interviews to understand how they experienced flow and how it affected their learning. Our findings showed that the ChatGPT-based environment strongly supports flow antecedents. Skill-challenge balance and Playability were particularly influential for inducing flow experiences. Students who experienced a deeper flow showed better understanding of argumentative writing logic, although their writing self-efficacy became lower. Drawing from the findings, our study highlights how AI like ChatGPT can influence experiences and outcomes of logic learning and language learning, which may be applicable across various domains and disciplines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
期刊最新文献
What makes an app authentic? Determining antecedents of perceived authenticity in an AI-powered service app The effects of self-explanation on game-based learning: Evidence from eye-tracking analyses Avatars at risk: Exploring public response to sexual violence in immersive digital spaces Perception of non-binary social media users towards authentic non-binary social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1